Log in

Experimental investigation on the effect of confining pressure on the tensile strength of sandstone using hollow cylinder tensile test method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rock tensile strength is a factor that affects formation fracturing. Most of the formation fracture pressure prediction models treated it as a constant or ignored it due to its small magnitude. However, the rock tensile strength was observed increasing with elevated crustal stress, so it might be influential at a large depth. In this work, hollow cylinder tensile test method was adopted to measure the tensile strength of two types of sandstones under different confining pressures. Sample in this method has the similar stress state compared with the borehole wall rock, which is important because tensile strength varies with the stress state. The result revealed that there was a significant linear enhancement in rock tensile strength with the increase of confining pressure for both types of sandstones. The effect degree of confining pressure on the tensile strength of two different sandstones was nearly the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Sayed AS (1978) An experimental technique for measuring the fracture toughness of rock under downhole stress condition. VDI-berichte 313:819–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkan H, Cinar Y, Ülker EB (2010) Impact of capillary pressure, salinity and in situ conditions on CO2 injection into saline aquifers. Transp Porous Media 84:799–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC press

  • Anderson RA, Ingram DS, Zanier AM (1973) Determining fracture pressure gradients from well logs. J Pet Technol 25:1–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai B, Li X, Liu M, Shi L, Li Q (2012) A fast explicit finite difference method for determination of wellhead injection pressure. J Cent South Univ 19:3266–3272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban S, Anusavice KJ (1990) Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res 69:1791–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daines SR (1982) Prediction of fracture pressures for wildcat wells. J Pet Technol 34:863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton BA (1969) Fracture gradient prediction and its application in oilfield operations. J Pet Technol 21:1–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genter A, Evans K, Cuenot N, Fritsch D, Sanjuan B (2010) Contribution of the exploration of deep crystalline fractured reservoir of Soultz to the knowledge of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Compt Rendus Geosci 342:502–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook P (1997) Discussion of a new simple method to estimate fracture pressure gradients. SPE Drill Complet 12:71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongkui G, Yingsong L, Shanzhou M (2001) Modification of Holbrook’s fracture pressure prediction model. Petroleum Drilling Techniques 29:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbert MK, Willis DG (1957) Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. US Geol Surv 210:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • ** Y, Yuan J, Chen M, Chen KP, Lu Y, Wang H (2011) Determination of rock fracture toughness K IIC and its relationship with tensile strength. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:621–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Lin B, Zhai C (2015) A new technique for preventing and controlling coal and gas outburst hazard with pulse hydraulic fracturing: a case study in Yuwu coal mine, China. Nat Hazards 75:2931–2946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1469-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majer EL, Baria R, Stark M, Oates S, Bommer J, Smith B, Asanuma H (2007) Induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 36:185–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2007.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldal T, Tappel IM (2004) CO2 underground storage for Snøhvit gas field development. Energy 29:1403–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WR, Kelly J (1967) How to predict formation pressure and fracture gradient. Oil Gas J 65:92–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Mighani S, Sondergeld CH, Rai CS et al. (2015) Stress dependency of rock tensile strength. In: 49th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association

  • Molenda M, Stöckert F, Brenne S, Alber M, et al (2013) Comparison of hydraulic and conventional tensile strength tests. In: ISRM International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing. International Society for Rock Mechanics

  • Müller W (1986) Brittle crack growth in rocks. Pure Appl Geophys 124:693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perras MA, Diederichs MS (2014) A review of the tensile strength of rock: concepts and testing. Geotech Geol Eng 32:525–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Huddle CW (1977) Effect of confining pressure on fracture toughness of Indiana limestone. In: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. Elsevier, pp 289–293

  • Thallak S, Holder J, Gray KE (1993) The pressure dependence of apparent hydrofracture toughness. In: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. Elsevier, pp 831–835

  • Wei X, Li Q, Li X, Sun Y (2016) Impact indicators for caprock integrity and induced seismicity in CO2 geosequestration: insights from uncertainty analyses. Nat Hazards 81:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2063-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant numbers 2016M602381).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junzhe Li.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Abdullah M. Al-Amri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Zhang, G. & Liu, M. Experimental investigation on the effect of confining pressure on the tensile strength of sandstone using hollow cylinder tensile test method. Arab J Geosci 12, 768 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4797-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4797-y

Keywords

Navigation