Abstract
Background
To compare cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) qualitative and quantitative analysis methods for the noninvasive assessment of myocardial inflammation in patients with suspected acute myocarditis (AM).
Methods
A total of 61 patients with suspected AM underwent coronary angiography and CMR. Qualitative analysis was performed applying Lake-Louise Criteria (LLC), followed by quantitative analysis based on the evaluation of edema ratio (ER) and global relative enhancement (RE). Diagnostic performance was assessed for each method by measuring the area under the curves (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic analyses. The final diagnosis of AM was based on symptoms and signs suggestive of cardiac disease, evidence of myocardial injury as defined by electrocardiogram changes, elevated troponin I, exclusion of coronary artery disease by coronary angiography, and clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 3 months after admission to the chest pain unit.
Results
In all patients, coronary angiography did not show significant coronary artery stenosis. Troponin I levels and creatine kinase were higher in patients with AM compared to those without (both P < .001). There were no significant differences among LLC, T2-weighted short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, early (EGE), and late (LGE) gadolinium-enhancement sequences for diagnosis of AM. The AUC for qualitative (T2-weighted STIR 0.92, EGE 0.87 and LGE 0.88) and quantitative (ER 0.89 and global RE 0.80) analyses were also similar.
Conclusions
Qualitative and quantitative CMR analysis methods show similar diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of AM. These findings suggest that a simplified approach using a shortened CMR protocol including only T2-weighted STIR sequences might be useful to rule out AM in patients with acute coronary syndrome and normal coronary angiography.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AM:
-
Acute myocarditis
- CMR:
-
Cardiac magnetic resonance
- LLC:
-
Lake-Louise Criteria
- EGE:
-
Early gadolinium-enhancement
- LGE:
-
Late gadolinium-enhancement
- STIR:
-
Short time inversion recovery
- ER:
-
Edema ratio
- RE:
-
Relative enhancement
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- AUC:
-
Area under the curve
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
References
Cooper LT. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1526-38.
Jeserich M, Konstantinides S, Pavlik G, Bode C, Geibel A. Non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of acute viral myocarditis. Clin Res Cardiol 2009;98:753-63.
Francone M, Di Cesare E, Cademartiri F, Pontone G, Lovato L, Matta G, et al; CMR Italian Registry Group, Ligabue G, Mancini A, Palmierir F, Restaino G, Puppini G, Centonze M, et al. Italian registry of cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:e15-22.
Antony R, Daghem M, McCann GP, Daghem S, Moon J, Pennell DJ, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance activity in the United Kingdom: A survey on behalf of the British Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:57.
Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, Alakija P, Cooper LT, et al. International Consensus Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1475-87.
Chu GC, Flewitt JA, Mikami Y, Vermes E, Friedrich MG. Assessment of acute myocarditis by cardiovascular MR: Diagnostic performance of shortened protocols. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:1077-83.
Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC committee for practice guidelines. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054.
Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ. Nagel E; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:35.
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:539-42.
Gutberlet M, Spors B, Thoma T, Bertram H, Denecke T, Felix R, et al. Suspected chronic myocarditis at cardiac MR: Diagnostic accuracy and association with immunohistologically detected inflammation and viral persistence. Radiology 2008;246:401-9.
Park CH, Choi EY, Greiser A, Paek MY, Hwang SH, Kim TH. Diagnosis of acute global myocarditis using cardiac MRI with quantitative T1 and T2 map**: Case report and literature review. Korean J Radiol 2013;14:727-32.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-43.
Vermes E, Childs H, Faris P, Friedrich MG. Predictive value of CMR criteria for LV functional improvement in patients with acute myocarditis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1140-4.
Grün S, Schumm J, Greulich S, Wagner A, Schneider S, Bruder O, et al. Long-term follow-up of biopsy-proven viral myocarditis: Predictors of mortality and incomplete recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1604-15.
Schumm J, Greulich S, Wagner A, Grun S, Ong P, Bentz K, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance risk stratification in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:14.
Dwyer AJ, Frank JA, Sank VJ, Reinig JW, Hickey AM, Doppman JL. Short-T1 inversion-recovery pulse sequence: analysis and initial experience in cancer imaging. Radiology 1988;168:827-36.
Esposito A, Francone M, Faletti R, Centonze M, Cademartiri F, Carbone I, et al. Working Group of the Italian College of Cardiac Radiology by SIRM. Lights and shadows of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocarditis Insights Imaging 2016;7:99-110.
Yelgec NS, Dymarkowski S, Ganame J, Bogaert J. Value of MRI in patients with clinical suspicion of acute myocarditis. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2211-7.
Abdel-Aty H, Boyé P, Zagrosek A, Wassmuth R, Kumar A, Messroghli D, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: Comparison of different approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1815-22.
Manciet LH, Poole DC, McDonagh PF, Copeland JG, Mathieu-Costello O. Microvascular compression during myocardial ischemia: Mechanistic basis for no-reflow phenomenon. Am J Physiol 1994;266:H1541-50.
Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A, Meinhardt G, Athanasiadis A, Vogelsberg H, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: A comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation 2004;109:1250-8.
Hauck AJ, Kearney DL, Edwards WD. Evaluation of postmortem endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 38 patients with lymphocytic myocarditis: Implications for role of sampling error. Mayo Clin Proc 1989;64:1235-45.
Chow LH, Radio SJ, Sears TD, McManus BM. Insensitivity of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in the diagnosis of myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:915-20.
Luetkens JA, Homsi R, Sprinkart AM, Sprinkart AM, Doerner J, Dabir D, et al. Incremental value of quantitative CMR including parametric map** for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:154-61.
Baeßler B, Schaarschmidt F, Dick A, Stehning C, Schnackenburg B, Michels G, et al. Map** tissue inhomogeneity in acute myocarditis: A novel analytical approach to quantitative myocardial edema imaging by T2-map**. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;23:115.
Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall’Armellina E, Karamitsos TD, Francis JM, Ntusi N, et al. Native T1-map** detects the location, extent and patterns of acute myocarditis without the need for gadolinium contrast agents. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;23:36.
Greulich S, Ferreira VM, Dall’Armellina E, Mahrholdt H. Myocardial inflammation—are we there yet? Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2015;8:6.
Radunski UK, Lund GK, Stehning C, Schnackenburg B, Boehnen S, Adam G, et al. CMR in patients with severe myocarditis: Diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers including extracellular volume imaging. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:667-75.
Bohnen S, Radunski UK, Lund GK, Ojeda F, Looft Y, Senel M, et al. Tissue characterization by T1 and T2 map** cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to monitor myocardial inflammation in healing myocarditis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017 Mar 8. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jex007. [Epub ahead of print].
Spieker M, Haberkorn S, Gasti M, Behm P, Katsianos S, Horn P, et al. Abnormal T2 map** cardiovascular magnetic resonance correlates with adverse clinical outcome in patients with suspected acute myocarditis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017;19:38.
Disclosure
M. Imbriaco, C. Nappi, M. Puglia, M. De Giorgi, S. Dell’Aversana, R. Cuocolo, A. Ponsiglione, I. De Giorgi, M.V. Polito, M. Klain, F. Piscione, L. Pace, A. Cuocolo declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors of this article have provided a PowerPoint file, available for download at SpringerLink, which summarizes the contents of the paper and is free for re-use at meetings and presentations. Search for the article DOI on SpringerLink.com.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imbriaco, M., Nappi, C., Puglia, M. et al. Assessment of acute myocarditis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of qualitative and quantitative analysis methods. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 26, 857–865 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1109-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1109-3