Abstract
Pre-bending is a critical process required prior to hydroforming. The bending has an effect on the tube thickness and strain which will use up a portion of the formability of the as-received tube. To compensate for this loss of formability, a multi-objective optimization method was applied to improve the hydroforming process after pre-bending. A multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) and Kriging surrogate model were used to optimize the loading path. The Kriging model was used to replace the finite element simulation in constraint handling. The optimal loading parameters in the hydroforming process were obtained for a tube that was previously bent 90°, and showed an improvement in reducing the corner radii of the part at the extrados and intrados of the bend (8.73 mm and 11.24 mm for the extrados and intrados of the bend, respectively). The corresponding corner fill expansion (CFE) was improved by 16.7% (or 1.79 mm) compared to the maximum expansion of 10.73 mm obtained experimentally.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig8_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig10_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig11_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig12_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig13_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig14_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig15_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig16_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig17_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12289-011-1079-y/MediaObjects/12289_2011_1079_Fig18_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- σ 1 σ 2 :
-
True principal major and minor stresses
- ε 1 ε 2 :
-
True principal major and minor strains
- f 1 f 2, f 3, f 4 :
-
Objectives for forming severity evaluation
- f 5 f 6 :
-
Objectives of corner fill radius
References
Lee H, Van Tyne CJ, Field D (2005) Finite element bending analysis of oval tubes using rotary draw bender for hydroforming applications. J Mater Process Tech 168:327–335
Oliveira DA, Worswick MJ, Grantab R (2005) Effect of lubricant in mandrel-rotary draw tube bending of steel and aluminum. Can Metall Q 44(1):71–78
Green DE (2008) Formability Analysis for Tubular Hydroformed Parts. In: Koç M (ed) Hydroforming for advanced manufacturing (Chapter 5). Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, England, ISBN 978-1-84569-328-2
Ahmetoglu M, Altan T (2000) Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends. J Mater Process Tech 98:25–33
Dyment J, Worswick MJ, Normani F, Oliveira D, Khodayari G (2003) Effect of endfeed on strains and thickness during bending and on the subsequent hydroformability of steel tubes. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-2837
Bardelcik A, Worswick MJ (2005a) Numerical investigation into the effects of bending boost and hydroforming end-feed on the hydroformability of DP600 tube. 2005-01-0094, Proceedings of SAE Conference
Bardelcik A, Worswick MJ (2005) The effect of element formulation on the prediction of boost in numerical tube bending. Proceedings of Numisheet 2005:775–780
Yang J, Jeon B, Oh S (2001) The tube bending technology of a hydroforming process for an automotive part. J Mat Process Tech 111:175–181
Dyment J (2004) The Effect of Bending Process on the Hydroformability of Steel Tubes. MASc. Thesis, University of Waterloo
Sorine M (2007) Formability of advanced high strength steel tubes in tube bending and hydroforming. MASc. Thesis, University of Waterloo
Koc M, Altan T (2001) An overall review of the tube hydroforming (THF) technology. J Mater Process Tech 108:384–393
Trana K (2002) Finite element simulation of the tube hydroforming process—bending, performing and hydroforming. J Mater Process Tech 127:401–408
Bardelcik A (2006) Effect of pre-bending and hydroforming parameters on the formability of advanced high strength steel tubes. Master Thesis, University of Waterloo
Bardelcik A, Sorine M, Oliveira D, Worswick M (2005) Tube Bending and Hydroforming of DP600, IF and AKDQ Steel Tube. AUTO21 Group Meeting
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S et al (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–19
An H, Green DE, Johrendt J (2009) A global optimization of load path design for tube hydroforming applications using MOGA. Proceedings of IDDRG conference, June, Golden, CO, USA, 307–318
An H, Green DE, Johrendt J (2010) Multi-objective optimization and sensitivity analysis of tube hydroforming simulations. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 50(1–4):67–84. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2505-x
An H, Green DE, Johrendt J (2009) Optimization of tube hydroforming using pulsating internal pressure. Proceedings of Materials Science & Technology (MS&T), October 25–29, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 2321–2332
An H, Green DE, Johrendt J (2011) A hybrid-constrained MOGA and local search method to optimize the load path for tube hydroforming. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. doi:10.1007/s00170-011-3648-0
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and Ontario Graduate Scholarship for Science and Technology (OGSST) of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
An, H., Green, D., Johrendt, J. et al. Multi-objective optimization of loading path design in multi-stage tube forming using MOGA. Int J Mater Form 6, 125–135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-011-1079-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-011-1079-y