Abstract
Simulation tools especially for the electromagnetic forming process (EMF process) offer the opportunity to analyse the formation process and its effects already in the development stage. The EMF process is a high-dynamic process with high transformation velocities. The deformation results from the interaction of the electrical current in the forming coil and the induced eddy current in the workpiece, represented by the Lorentz force. Most of the simulation tools and models for the EMF process are limited to small deformations. The connection between electromagnetic field and spatiotemporal evolution of the deformation of the workpiece is not negligible for example for working out a door handle recess in the automotive industry. This paper presents a comparison of a custom loose-coupled simulation model and a more accurate sequential-coupled approach. The deviations between the two simulation models increase with time, so that the loose-coupled approach leads to an overestimation of the final deformation. The correspondence of the sequential-coupled simulation with the measurement result is much better than for the loose-coupled simulation.
References
Winkler R (1973) Hochgeschwindigkeitsbearbeitung, Berlin
Schätzing W, Müller G (2003) FEM für Praktiker- Band 4: Elektrotechnik, expert Verlag
Takata N, Kato M, Sato K, Tobe K (1988) High-speed forming of metal sheets by electromagnetic forces. Soc Mech Eng Int J, 31, Japan
Doege E, Nolkemper H-M, Saeed I (1986) Fließkurvenatlas metallischer Werkstoffe, Hanser Verlag München Wien
Brosius A (2005) Verfahren zur Ermittlung dehnratenabhängiger Fließkurven mittels elektromagnetischer Rohrumformung und iterativer Finite-Elemente-Analyse, Berlin
Hai** YU, Chufeng LI, Jianghua DENG (2009) Sequential coupling simulation for electromagnetic-mechanical tube compression by finite element analyse. J Mater Process Technol 209:707–713
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartels, G., Schätzing, W., Scheibe, HP. et al. Comparison of two different simulation algorithms for the electromagnetic tube compression. Int J Mater Form 2 (Suppl 1), 693 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0620-8
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0620-8