Log in

Collision Avoidance of Low Speed Autonomous Shuttles with Pedestrians

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is on a pedestrian collision avoidance system for low speed autonomous shuttles based on Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) communication. When pedestrians cannot be detected using line-of-sight sensors like camera, radar and LIDAR, V2P communication with the Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) enabled pedestrian smartphone is used to detect and localize them through the in-vehicle DSRC radio used for Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication. The vehicle, then, either stops or, if possible, goes around the pedestrian in a socially acceptable manner using the elastic band method for locally modifying the vehicle trajectory in real time. The elastic band method of collision avoidance is modified for fast real time execution in this paper. Along with model-in-the-loop simulations, a hardware-in-the-loop simulator using an automated driving vehicle model in the high fidelity vehicle dynamics simulation program Carsim Real Time with Sensors and Traffic with two DSRC modems emulating the vehicle and pedestrian communications is introduced and used in this paper as a prerequisite to real world experiments. Both stationary and moving pedestrians are considered in the model and hardware-in-the-loop simulations. Two real world experiments are also presented to demonstrate the V2P based avoidance of crashes between low speed autonomous shuttles and pedestrians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ararat, O. and Aksun-Guvenc, B. (2008). Development of a collision avoidance algorithm using elastic band theory. IFAC Proc. Volumes41, 2, 2–8525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avanish, H., Naik, B. A., Gaonkar, P. K. and Basavraj, A. (2013). Car to car communication for enhancing highway safety and cooperative collision avoidance. Int. J. Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)2, 5, 5–1618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri, M., Siekkinen, M. and Nurminen, J. K. (2016). Cloud-based pedestrian road-safety with situation-adaptive energy-efficient communication. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine8, 3, 3–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, W. (2014). Safety enhancement service for vulnerable users using P2V communications. Proc. Int. Conf. Connected Vehicles and Expo, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, K. and Flac, A. (2010). CAR-2-X and pedestrian safety. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine5, 1, 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbatt, T., Goel, S. K., Holland, G, Krishnan, H. and Parikh, J. (2006). Cooperative collision warning using dedicated short range wireless communications. Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Vehiclular Ad Hoc Networks, Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirler, M., Wang, H. and Aksun-Guvenc, B. (2016). Socially acceptable collision avoidance system for vulnerable road users. IFAC-PapersOnLine49, 3, 3–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirler, M., Wang, H., Aksun-Guvenc, B. and Guvenc, L. (2015). Automated robust path following control based on calculation of lateral deviation and yaw angle error. Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conf, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, T. and Trivedi, M. M. (2007). Pedestrian protection systems: Issues, survey, and challenges. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems8, 3, 3–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbal, S., Aksun Guvenc, B. and Guvenc, L. (2017). SmartShuttle: A unified, scalable and replicable approach to connected and automated driving in a smart city. Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Science of Smart City Operations and Platforms Engineering, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomathi, C., Gandhimathi, D. and Dhivya, K. D. R. (2014). A review on vehicle-to-vehicle communication protocols for traffic safety using co-operative collision warning. Int. J. Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies2, 10, 10–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guvenc, L., Aksun-Guvenc, B., Demirel, B. and Emirler, M. T. (2017a). Control of Mechatronic Systems. IET. London, UK.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guvenc, L., Aksun-Guvenc, B. and Emirler, M. (2017b). Connected and Autonomous Vehicles. Internet of Things/Cyber-Physical Systems/Data Analytics Handbook. Wiley. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, K. (2016). NYC Looks to Tech to Improve Pedestrian Safety. https://gcn.com/articles/2016/10/19/nyc-ped-sig.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P.-F. and Chen, J.-C. (2017). WiSafe: Wi-Fi pedestrian collision avoidance system. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology66, 6, 6–4578. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/road_traffic/decade_booklet/en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office-Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (2016). DSRC: The Future of Safer Driving. http://www.its.dot.gov/factsheets/dsrc_factsheet.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, F., Naranjo, J. E. and Gómez, Ó. (2015). Autonomous collision avoidance system based on accurate knowledge of the vehicle surroundings. IET Intelligent Transport Systems9, 1, 1–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, J. B. (2011). Dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) standards in the United States. Proc. IEEE99, 7, 7–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misener, J. A., Biswas, S. and Larson, G. (2011). Development of V-to-X systems in North America: The promise, the pitfalls and the prognosis. Computer Networks55, 14, 14–3133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paier, A., Faetani, D. and Mecklenbräuker, C. F. (2010). Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.11p physical layer infrastructure-to-vehicle real-world measurements. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, S. and Khatib, O. (1993). Elastic bands: Connecting path planning and control. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokowska, A., Sorokowski, P., Hilpert, P. et al. (2017). Preferred interpersonal distances: A global comparison. J. Cross-Cultural Psychology48, 4, 4–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E., Yanagisawa, M., Najm, W. G., Foderaro, F. and Azeredo, P. (2016). Crash Avoidance Needs and Countermeasure Profiles for Safety Applications Based on Light-vehicle-to-pedestrian Communications. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NTHSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Themann, P., Kotte, J., Raudszus, D. and Eckstein, L. (2015). Impact of positioning uncertainty of vulnerable road users on risk minimization in collision avoidance systems. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Transportation (2017). United States Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office-V2P Narration. https://www.its.dot.gov/communications/media/V2P_Narration.mp4

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, N., Kumar, G., Siddhant, A., Nama, P., Raj, A., and Mustafa, A. (2015). Vision based obstacle avoidance and recognition system. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Computational Intelligence: Theories, Applications and Future Directions (WCI), Kanpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Tota, A., Aksun-Guvenc, B. and Guvenc, L. (2018). Real time implementation of socially acceptable collision avoidance of a low speed autonomous shuttle using the elastic band method. IFAC Mechatronics J., 50, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Huang, W., Liu, X. and Tian, Y (2012). Vehicle collision avoidance algorithm based on state estimation in the roundabout. Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Control and Information Processing, Dalian, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S.-Y, Cheng, Y.-W, Lin, C.-C, Hong, W.-J. and He, T.-W (2008). A vehicle collision warning system employing vehicle-to-infrastructure communications. Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2011). Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011–2020: Saving Millions of Lives.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation Mobility 21: National University Transportation Center for Improving Mobility (CMU) sub-project titled: SmartShuttle: Model Based Design and Evaluation of Automated On-Demand Shuttles for Solving the First-Mile and Last-Mile Problem in a Smart City.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Levent Guvenc.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gelbal, S.Y., Aksun-Guvenc, B. & Guvenc, L. Collision Avoidance of Low Speed Autonomous Shuttles with Pedestrians. Int.J Automot. Technol. 21, 903–917 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-020-0087-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-020-0087-7

Key Words

Navigation