Log in

A Survey on the Establishment and Application of Social Capital Partner Selection System for the New Profit PPP Project

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

As the economy in China enters the new normal, Public-Private Partnerships have been an important measure for alleviating financial tensions and improving the administrative efficiency of the government. Based on the mode of open tendering for the selection of social capital partners for the new profit project, the open tendering procedures were analyzed. In addition, based on an improved TOPSIS model, the evaluation index system for the selection conducts a comprehensive evaluation of six aspects: reputation and performance, water pricing factor, financing program, construction program, operation and maintenance program, and transfer program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrera, J., Parham, A., and McDonough, J. F. (2010). “Public-private partnership, information technology, and operational efficiency at Sandy Springs, Georgia.” IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 55, Nos. 1–2, pp. 148–162, DOI: 10.1147/JRD.2010.2097090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, D. K. H., Kog, Y. C., and Loh, P. K. (1999). “Critical success factor for different project objectives.” Journal of Construction Engineering Management, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 142–150, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:3(142).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, A. J., Ainsworth, N., Hauser, C. E., Burgman, M. A., McCarthy, M. A. (2017). “Prioritizing plant eradication targets by re-framing the Project Prioritization Protocol (PPP) for use in biosecurity applications.” Biological Invasions, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 859–873, DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1335-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatemeh Torfi and Abbas Rashidi (2011). “Selection of project managers in construction firms using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Topsis: A case study.” Journal of Construction in Develo** Countries, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N. and Horioka, C. (2017). “The ‘real’ explanation of the PPP puzzle.” Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 325–328, DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2016.1186790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu-Kuo, G. and **ao-Hu, C. (2013). “Partner selection about the ppp reclaimed water project based on extension evaluation method.” 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management: Assistive Technology of Industrial Engineering, pp. 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M. C. and Narasimham, S. V. (1998). “Discussion of ‘CSFs in competitive tendering and negotiation model for BOT projects’ by R. L. K. Tiong.” Journal of Construction Engineering Management, Vol. 124, No. 5, p. 430, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998) 124:5(430).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurgun, A. P. and Touran, A. (2014). “Public-private partnership experience in the international arena: Case of Turkey.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 1128–1242, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, B. G., Zhao, X. B., and Gay, M. (2012). “Public private partnership projects in Singapore: Factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 424–433, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, K. C. and Sagheer, M. (2010). “Hierarchical structuring of PPP risks using interpretative structural modeling.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 2, pp. 151–159, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., Hu, Y., and Feng, Z. (2018). “Factors Influencing Early Termination of PPP Projects in China.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 05017008–1-05017008-10, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosoy N., Martinez T. M., Muradian R., Martinez-Alier J. (2007). “Payments for environmental services in watersheds: Insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America.” Ecological economics, Vol. 61, Nos. 2–3, pp. 446–455, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H. and Yu, Y. H. (2011). “Service delivery comparisons on household connections in Taiwan's sewer public-private-partnership (PPP) projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 1033–1043, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalingam, A. (2010). “PPP experiences in Indian cities: Barriers, enablers, and the way forward.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 419–429, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meduri, S. S. and Annamalai, T. R. (2017) “Unit costs of public and PPP road projects: Evidence from India.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 139, No. 1, pp. 35–43, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouenniche J., Boukouras A., and Mohammad, R. (2016). “An ordinal game theory approach to the analysis and selection of partners in public-private partnership projects.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, Vol. 169, No. 1, pp. 314–343, DOI: 10.1007/s10957-015-0844-3.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sahooly, A. (2003). “Public-private partnership in the water supply and sanitation sector: The experience of the Republic of Yemen.” International Journal of Water Resources Development, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 139–152, DOI: 10.1080/0790062032000089275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardenne, F., Kraffe, E., Amiel, A., Fouche, E., Debrauwer, L, Ménard, F., and Bodin, N. (2017). “Biological and environmental influence on tissue fatty acid compositions in wild tropical tunas.” Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & Integrative Physiology, Vol. 204, pp. 17–27, DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, Y. J., Shin, J., Kang, M., and Sung, J. (2017). “Genetic and Environmental Influences on General Skin Traits: Healthy Twins and Families in Korea.” Twin Research and Human Genetics: The Official Journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 36–42, DOI: 10.1017/thg.2016.86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiong, R. L. K. and Alum, J. (1997). “Distinctive winning elements in BOT tender.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 83–94, DOI: 10.1108/eb021041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen-xiong, W., Qi-ming, L., **ao-peng, D., Li-hua, L., and Yuan, C. (2007). “Selecting optimal private-sector partner in infrastructure projects under PPP model.” Proceedings of 2007 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (14th), Vols. 1–3, pp. 2264–2270, DOI:10.1109/ICMSE.2007.4422176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue-Qqing, Z. (2005). “Criteria for selecting the private-sector partner in public-private partnerships.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 6, pp. 631–644, DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(631).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Shen, Jq., Meng, Zj. et al. A Survey on the Establishment and Application of Social Capital Partner Selection System for the New Profit PPP Project. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 3726–3737 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0489-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0489-5

Keywords

Navigation