Log in

Nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas with cortisol post-dexamethasone suppression test >0.9 µg/dL have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease than those with values ≤0.9 µg/dL

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the differences in the cardiometabolic profile in patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas (NFAI) with post-dexamethasone suppression test (DST) cortisol ≤1.4 µg/dL (NFAI ≤ 1.4) and those with post-DST cortisol >1.4 µg/dL (NFAI > 1.4) and between NFAI with post-DST cortisol ≤0.9 µg/dL (NFAI ≤ 0.9) and those with levels >0.9 µg/dL (NFAI > 0.9).

Methods

Multicenter retrospective observational study of patients with NFAIs. NFAI was defined as an adrenal incidentaloma with negative hormonal study (including metanephrines, post-DST cortisol ≤1.8 µg/dL and aldosterone/renin ratio when screening was indicated). Autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) development was defined as an NFAIs in which post-DST serum cortisol >1.8 µg/dL were evidenced during hormonal follow-up evaluation.

Results

A total of 593 NFAI were included. Based on the 1.4 µg/dL threshold in the DST, most of the NFAI were classified as NFAI ≤ 1.4 (74.5%). Patients in the NFAI > 1.4 group were older than those in the NFAI ≤ 1.4 group, but there was no difference in the cardiometabolic profile after adjusting for age. A total of 69.5% of the patients had DST > 0.9 µg/dl. They were older and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease than NFAI ≤ 0.9, even after adjusting by age (adjusted OR = 2.23 [1.10–4.53]). Patients in the NFAI > 1.4 group developed ACS more commonly than the NFAI ≤ 1.4 group (23.5% vs. 7.44%, P < 0.001). However, when the threshold of 0.9 µg/dL was considered, no difference was found between NFAI ≤ 0.9 and NFAI > 0.9 (P = 0.126).

Conclusion

The threshold of 1.4 µg/dL in the DST is useful to predict which patients with NFAI had a higher risk of ACS development during follow-up; and the threshold of 0.9 µg/dL to identify those patients with NFAI with a higher cardiovascular risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Terzolo, A. Stigliano, I. Chiodini, P. Loli, L. Furlani, G. Arnaldi et al. AME position statement on adrenal incidentaloma. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 164, 851–870 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. W.F. Young, The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N. Engl. J. Med 356, 601–610 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmcp065470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Fassnacht, W. Arlt, I. Bancos, H. Dralle, J. Newell-Price, A. Sahdev et al. Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 175, G1–G34 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Araujo-Castro, M. Iturregui Guevara, M. Calatayud Gutiérrez, P. Parra Ramírez, P. Gracia Gimeno, F.A. Hanzu et al. Practical guide on the initial evaluation, follow-up, and treatment of adrenal incidentalomas Adrenal Diseases Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition. Endocrinol. Diabetes y. Nutr. 67, 408–419 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endinu.2020.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.H. Kim, Min Joo Kim, J.H. Lee, J.W. Yoon, C.S. Shin, M.J. Kim et al. Nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas are not clinically silent: a longitudinal cohort study. Endocr. Pr. 26, 1406–1415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4158/EP-2020-0182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Athanasouli, G. Georgiopoulos, N. Asonitis, F. Petychaki, A. Savelli, E. Panou et al. Nonfunctional adrenal adenomas and impaired glucose metabolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 74, 50–60 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-021-02741-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Emral, B.İ. Aydoğan, A.D. Köse, Ö. Demir, D. Çorapçıoğlu, Could a nonfunctional adrenal incidentaloma be a risk factor for increased carotid intima-media thickness and metabolic syndrome. Endocrinol. Diabetes y. Nutr. 66, 402–409 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endinu.2019.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Araujo-Castro Cardiometabolic profile and urinary metabolomic alterations in non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas: a review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.14745

  9. M. Araujo-Castro, H.F. Escobar-Morreale, P. Valderrábano, A Proposal for Nomenclature Revision of Non-functioning Adrenal Incidentalomas as Adrenal Lesions of Undetermined Secretion of Adrenal Steroids (ALUSAS). Endocr Pract (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPRAC.2022.06.007

  10. M. Araujo-Castro, P. Parra Ramírez, C. Robles Lázaro, R. García Centeno, P. Gracia Gimeno, M.T. Fernández-Ladreda, et al. Predictors of tumour growth and autonomous cortisol secretion development during follow-up in non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas. J Clin Med 10, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235509

  11. M. Araujo-Castro, P.P. Ramírez, C.R. Lázaro, R.G. Centeno, P.G. Gimeno, M.T. Fernández-Ladreda et al. Accuracy of the dexamethasone suppression test for the prediction of autonomous cortisol secretion-related comorbidities in adrenal incidentalomas. Horm 2021 20, 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S42000-021-00308-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Genere, R.J. Kaur, S. Athimulam, M.A. Thomas, T. Nippoldt, M. Van Norman et al. Interpretation of abnormal dexamethasone suppression test is enhanced with use of synchronous free cortisol assessment. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 107, E1221–E1230 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1210/CLINEM/DGAB724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Araujo-Castro, E. Pascual-Corrales, A. Acitores Cancela, S. García Duque, L. Ley Urzaiz, V. Rodríguez Berrocal, Status and clinical and radiological predictive factors of presurgical anterior pituitary function in pituitary adenomas. Study 232 patients Endocr. 70, 584–592 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02455-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P.A. Harris, R. Taylor, R. Thielke, J. Payne, N. Gonzalez, J.G. Conde, Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inf. 42, 377–381 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P.A. Harris, R. Taylor, B.L. Minor, V. Elliott, M. Fernandez, O’Neal L., et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 95, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208

  16. M. Araujo-Castro, C. Robles Lázaro, P. Parra Ramírez, R. García Centeno, P. Gracia Gimeno, M.T. Fernández-Ladreda et al. Maximum adenoma diameter, regardless of uni- or bilaterality, is a risk factor for autonomous cortisol secretion in adrenal incidentalomas. J. Endocrinol. Invest 44, 2349–2357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-021-01539-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Akkus, G. Akkus, O. Kaypakli, F.K. Ozturk, E. Gurkan, O. Bekler et al. Increased rates of coronary artery calcium score in patients with non - functioning adrenal incidentaloma. Endocr., Metab. Immune Disord. - Drug Targets 21, 1319–1325 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530320666200910110337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M.P. de Paula, A.B. Moraes, M. de Souza, G.C. das, E.M.R. Cavalari, R.C. Campbell, G. Fernandes, S. da et al. Cortisol level after dexamethasone suppression test in patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentaloma is positively associated with the duration of reactive hyperemia response on microvascular bed. J. Endocrinol. Invest 44, 609–619 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-020-01360-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. V. Morelli, C. Aresta, A. Gaudio, C. Eller-Vainicher, V.V. Zhukouskaya, D. Merlotti et al. Prediction of hypertension, diabetes and fractures in eucortisolemic women by measuring parameters of cortisol milieu. Endocrine 68, 411–419 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/S12020-020-02212-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Parasiliti-Caprino, C. Lopez, M. Bollati, F. Bioletto, C. Sola, M.C. Di Carlo, et al. A retrospective study on the association between urine metanephrines and cardiometabolic risk in patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentaloma. Sci Rep 12, (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-022-19321-2

  21. M. Araujo-Castro, G. Casals, F.A. Hanzu, E. Pascual-Corrales, A.M. García Cano, V.F. Lanza, et al. Characterisation of the urinary steroid profile of patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas: A matched controlled cross-sectional study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/CEN.14811

  22. I. Karahan, S. Durmaz Ceylan, A. Gungunes, A. Cifci, F. Eker, U. Kisa, Non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas may increase toxic metabolites. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 134, 125–129 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00508-021-01909-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Peppa, C. Koliaki, S.A. Raptis, Adrenal incidentalomas and cardiometabolic morbidity: an emerging association with serious clinical implications. J. Intern Med 268, 555–566 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02291.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Falcetta, F. Orsolini, E. Benelli, P. Agretti, P. Vitti, C. Di Cosmo et al. Clinical features, risk of mass enlargement, and development of endocrine hyperfunction in patients with adrenal incidentalomas: a long-term follow-up study. Endocrine 71, 178–188 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02476-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Araujo‐Castro, G. Casals, F.A. Hanzu, E. Pascual‐Corrales, A.M. García Cano, V.F. Lanza, et al. Characterisation of the urinary steroid profile of patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas: A matched controlled cross-sectional study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/CEN.14811

  26. N. Muangnoo, W. Manosroi, N. Leelathanapipat, T. Meejun, P. Chowchaiyaporn, P. Teetipsatit Predictive Factors of Functioning Adrenal Incidentaloma: A 15-Year Retrospective Study. Med 2022 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEDICINA58050597/S1

  27. L. Barzon, C. Scaroni, N. Sonino, F. Fallo, A. Paoletta, M. Boscaro Risk Factors and Long-Term Follow-Up of Adrenal Incidentalomas 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1999). https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.2.5444

  28. D.A. Vassiliadi, G. Ntali, E. Vicha, S. Tsagarakis, High prevalence of subclinical hypercortisolism in patients with bilateral adrenal incidentalomas: a challenge to management. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 74, 438–444 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03963.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. E. Vassilatou, A. Vryonidou, D. Ioannidis, S.A. Paschou, M. Panagou, I. Tzavara, Bilateral adrenal incidentalomas differ from unilateral adrenal incidentalomas in subclinical cortisol hypersecretion but not in potential clinical implications. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 171, 37–45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Olsen, E. Nordenström, A. Bergenfelz, U. Nyman, S. Valdemarsson, E. Palmqvist, Subclinical hypercortisolism and CT appearance in adrenal incidentalomas: a multicenter study from Southern Sweden. Endocrine 42, 164–173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-012-9622-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

SENDIMAD: BECA SENDIMAD de Ayuda a la Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Diabetes 2019. IRYCIS (Convocatoria intramural de ayudas aproyectos de investigación deinvestigadores noveles, investigadoresclínicos asociados y/o grupos emergentesdel Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal2019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Araujo-Castro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal. Madrid. Spain (approval date: 23 September 2019, acta CEIm 10/19, approval number: 3702)

Informed consent

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. Only for patients who continued follow-up or prospectively included the informed consent was requested.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araujo-Castro, M., Parra Ramírez, P., Martín Rojas-Marcos, P. et al. Nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas with cortisol post-dexamethasone suppression test >0.9 µg/dL have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease than those with values ≤0.9 µg/dL. Endocrine 79, 384–391 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03228-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03228-z

Keywords

Navigation