Abstract
Purpose of Review
Gentle and continuous loads are preferred for optimum orthodontic tooth movement. Nitinol, an alloy of nickel and titanium developed for the aerospace industry, found its first clinical applications in orthodontics because it has ideal load-deflection behavior. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the criteria for effective orthodontic mechanics relative to emerging Nitinol technology. The specialized materials with variable stiffness that were originally developed for orthodontics are increasingly attractive for in the temporomandibular joint, orthognathic surgery, and orthopedics.
Recent Findings
The evolution of orthodontic archwires is driven by a need to achieve low load-deflection characteristics and Nitinol is the alloy of choice. Scientific knowledge of the biological response to orthodontic forces continues to grow, but definitive guidance on optimal force levels for individual teeth is elusive. Finite element models (FEM) that take into account periodontal ligament (PDL) stresses indicate differential force archwires are needed to realize optimal treatment. However, previous wire fabrication methods, including welding of different materials and selective resistive heating, are limited by poor mechanical performance and spatial resolution. Recently, a novel laser processing technique was developed for precisely programing relative levels of stiffness in a single archwire. FEM was used to estimate the optimal force for each tooth by calculating the 3D bone-PDL surface area.
Summary
There remains a general consensus that light and continuous forces are desirable for orthodontic treatment. New developments in archwire materials and technology have provided the orthodontist with a complete spectrum of load-deflection rates and differential force options to express these forces with maximized archwire economy. These technologies also appear to have application to orthopedic implant devices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance
Storey E, Smith R. Force in orthodontics and its relation to tooth movement. Aust J Dent. 1952;56:291–304.
Roberts WE, Sarandeep SH. Bone physiology, metabolism, and biomechanics in orthodontic practice. In: Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, KWL V, Huang GJ, editors. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 6th ed. Oxford: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. p. 99–152.
Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:721–45.
Begg PR. Differential force in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1956;42:481–510.
Burstone CJ, Baldwin JJ, Lawless DT. The application of continuous forces to orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 1961;31:1–14.
Harder OE, Roberts DA. Alloy having high elastic strengths. US Patent 2,524,661. 1950.
Buehler WJ, Gilfrich JV, Wiley RC. Effect of low-temperature phase changes on the mechanical properties of alloys near composition TiNi. J Appl Phys. 1963;34:1475–7.
Pelton AR, Duerig TW, Stockel D. A guide to shape memory and superelasticity in Nitinol medical devices. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2004;13:218–21.
Duerig TW, Pelton A, Stöckel D. An overview of nitinol medical applications. Mater Sci Eng A. 1999;273:149–60.
Andreasen GF, Hilleman TB. An evaluation of 55 cobalt substituted nitinol wire for orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1971;82:1373–5.
Andreasen GF, Barrett RD. An evaluation of cobalt-substituted nitinol wire in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1973;63:462–70.
Andreasen GF, Morrow RE. Laboratory and clinical analyses of nitinol wire. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:142–51.
Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y. Japanese NiTi alloy wire: use of the direct electric resistance heat treatment method. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:187–91.
Robertson SW, Pelton AR, Ritchie RO. Mechanical fatigue and fracture of Nitinol. Int Mater Rev. 2012;57(1):1–36.
Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1972;62:296–309.
Burstone CJ, Morton JY. Chinese NiTi wire—a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:445–52.
Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Hamanaka H. The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1986;90:1–10.
Gil FJ, Planell JA. In vitro thermomechanical ageing of Ni-Ti alloys. J Biomater Appl. 1998;12:237–48.
Gil FJ, Planell JA. Effect of copper addition on the superelastic behavior of Ni-Ti shape memory alloys for orthodontic applications. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;48:682–8.
Goldberg J, Burstone CJ. An evaluation of beta titanium alloys for use in orthodontic appliances. J Dent Res. 1979;58:593–600.
Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Beta titanium: a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:121–32.
Dalstra M, Denes G, Melsen B. Titanium-niobium, a new finishing wire alloy. Clin Orthod Res. 2000;3:6–14.
Suzuki A, Kanetaka H, Shimizu Y, Tomizuka R, Hosoda H, Miyazaki S, et al. Orthodontic buccal tooth movement by nickel-free titanium-based shape memory and superelastic alloy wire. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:1041–6.
Saito T, Furuta T, Hwang J-H, Kuramoto S, Nishino K, Suzuki N, et al. Multifunctional alloys obtained via a dislocation-free plastic deformation mechanism. Science. 2003;300:464–7.
Chang H-P, Tseng Y-C. A novel β-titanium alloy orthodontic wire. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018. In press;34:202–6.
Laino G, De Santis R, Gloria A, Russo T, Quintanilla DS, Laino A, et al. Calorimetric and thermomechanical properties of titanium-based orthodontic wires: DSC-DMA relationship to predict the elastic modulus. J Biomater Appl. 2012;26:829–44.
Coro JC, Coro IM. Nonsurgical treatment of class III malocclusions using the multi-loop edgewise archwire appliance. In: OrthodonticProductsOnline.com. 2012. http://op.alliedmedia360.com//launch.aspx?eid=fdd7e997-e095-421e-a3db-f6650d9d1075. Accessed 06 April 2018.
Nordstrom B, Shoji T, Anderson WC, Fields HW, Beck FM, Kim D-G, et al. Comparison of changes in irregularity and transverse width with nickel-titanium and niobium-titanium-tantalum-zirconium archwires during initial orthodontic alignment in adolescents: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2018. In press;88:348–54.
Quinn RS, Yoshikawa DK. A reassessment of force magnitude in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:252–60.
Owman-Moll P, Kurol J, Lundgren D. The effects of a four-fold increased orthodontic force magnitude on tooth movement and root resorptions. An intra-individual study in adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:287–94.
Kilic N, Oktay H, Ersoz M. Effects of force magnitude on tooth movement: an experimental study in rabbits. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:154–8.
Limsiriwong S, Khemaleelakul W, Sirabanchongkran S, Pothacharoen P, Kongtawelert P, Ongchai S, et al. Biochemical and clinical comparisons of segmental maxillary posterior tooth distal movement between two different force magnitudes. Eur J Orthod. 2017:1–8.
Yee JA, Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Cheng LL, Darendeliler MA. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;136:150–1.
Ren Y, Maltha JC, Van’t Hof MA, Kuljpers-Jagtman AM. Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a mathematical model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;125:71–7.
Alikhani M, Alyami B, Lee IS, Almoammar S, Vongthongleur T, Alikhani M, et al. Saturation of the biological response to orthodontic forces and its effect on the rate of tooth movement. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2015;18 Suppl 1:8–17.
Melsen B, Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Kraft DC. The importance of force levels in relation to tooth movement. Semin Orthod. 2007;13:220–33.
• Viecilli RF, Burstone CJ. Ideal orthodontic alignment load relationships based on periodontal ligament stress. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2015;18:180–6. Identified the proportional load relationships between teeth required for equalizing stress in the periodontal ligature.
Savignano R, Viecilli RF, Paoli A, Razionale AV, Barone S. Nonlinear dependency of tooth movement on force system directions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;149(6):838–46.
Razali MF, Mahmud AS, Mokhtar N. Force delivery of NiTi orthodontic arch wire at different magnitude of deflections and temperatures: a finite element study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;77:234–41.
Burstone CJ. Rationale of the segmented arch. Am J Orthod. 1962;48:805–22.
Burstone CJ. Variable-modulus orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:1–16.
Sevilla P, Martorell F, Libenson C, Planell JA, Gil FJ. Laser welding of NiTi orthodontic archwires for selective force application. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:525–9.
Li Q, Zhu Y. Impact butt welding of NiTi and stainless steel—an examination of impact speed effect. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;255:434–42.
Matsunaga J, Watanabe I, Nakao N, Watanabe E, Elshahawy W, Yoshida N. Joining characteristics of titanium-based orthodontic wires connected by laser and electrical welding methods. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26:50.
Miura F. Orthodontic archwire. US Patent 5,017,133. 1991.
Gil FJ, Cenizo M, Espinar E, Rodriguez A, Ruperez E, Manero JM. NiTi superelastic orthodontic wires with variable stress obtained by ageing treatments. Mater Lett. 2013;104:5–7.
Sachdeva R, Farzin-Nia F. Shape memory orthodontic archwire having variable recovery stresses. US Patent 5,683,245. 1997.
Mehta ASK. Thermomechanical characterization of variable force NiTi orthodontic archwires. Master’s Thesis. Marquette University. 2015. http://epublications.marquette.edu/theses_open/328. Accessed 06 April 2018.
•• Khan MI, Pequegnat A, Zhou YN. Multiple memory shape memory alloys. Adv Eng Mater. 2013;15:386–93. Introduced a novel method for varying the mechanical properties of nickel-titanium-based shape memory materials for biomedical applications with very fine spatial resolution.
Roberts WE, Viecilli RF, Chang C, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Biology of biomechanics: finite element analysis of a statically determinate system to rotate the occlusal plane for correction of skeletal class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2015;148:943–55.
Schmerling MA, Wilkov MA, Sanders AE. Using the shape recovery of Nitinol in the Harrington rod treatment of scoliosis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976;10:879–92.
Sanchez Marquez JM, Perez-Grueso FJS, Fernandez-Baillo N, Garay EG. Gradual scoliosis correction over time with shape memory metal: a preliminary report of an experimental study. Scoliosis. 2012;7:20.
Norlin R. Use of Mitek anchoring for Bankart repair: a comparative, randomized, prospective study with traditional bone sutures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1994;3:381–5.
Richmond JC, Donaldson WR, Fu F, Harner CD. Modification of the Bankart reconstruction with a suture anchor. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:343–6.
Wolford LM. Temporomandibular joint devices: treatment factors and outcomes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1997;83:143–8.
Mehra P, Wolford LM. The Mitek mini anchor for TMJ disc repositioning: surgical technique and results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:497–503.
Ivorra-Carbonell L, Montiel-Company J-M, Almerich Silla J-M, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcis C. Impact of functional mandibular advancement appliances on the temporomandibular joint—a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21:e565–72.
Rigal J, Thelen T, Angelliaume A, Pontailler J-R, Lefevre Y. A new procedure for fractures of the medial epicondyle in children: Mitek bone suture anchor. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102:117–20.
Russell SM. Design considerations for Nitinol bone staples. J Mater Eng Perform. 2009;18:831–5.
Aiyer A, Russell NA, Pelletier MH, Myerson M, Walsh WR. The impact of Nitinol staples on the compressive forces, contact area, and mechanical properties in comparison to a claw plate and crossed screws for the first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;9:232–40.
Hoon QJ, Pelletier MH, Christou C, Johnson KA, Walsh WR. Biomechanical evaluation of shape-memory alloy staples for internal fixation—an in vitro study. J Exp Orthop. 2016;3:19.
Schipper ON, Ford SE, Moody PW, Van Doren B, Ellington JK. Radiographic results of Nitinol compression staples for hindfoot and midfoot arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39:172–9.
Saleeb AF, Dhakal B, Owusu-Danquah JS. Assessing the performance characteristics and clinical forces in simulated shape memory bone staple surgical procedure: the significance of SMA material model. Comput Biol Med. 2015;62:185–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Ibraheem Khan has a patent (US20170224444A1) pending, and Smarter Alloys Inc. (with which all authors are affiliated) is involved in the design and manufacture of appliances for orthodontic treatment.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Craniofacial Skeleton
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuntz, M.L., Vadori, R. & Khan, M.I. Review of Superelastic Differential Force Archwires for Producing Ideal Orthodontic Forces: an Advanced Technology Potentially Applicable to Orthognathic Surgery and Orthopedics. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16, 380–386 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0457-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0457-5