Log in

Applying the delta tool to support the Air Quality Directive: evaluation of the TCAM chemical transport model

  • Published:
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an application of the DELTA evaluation tool V3.2 to support the EU Air Quality Directive (AQD 2008). This software, designed in the frame of the FAIRMODE project (Forum for Air Quality Modelling in Europe, http://fairmode.ew.eea.europa.eu/), is currently used as support to working groups of modelers across Europe in the diagnostics and assessment of air quality model performances under the AQD (2008). The skills of the DELTA tool V3.2 are tested by looking at the results of a 1-year (2005) simulation performed using the transport chemical aerosol model (Carnevale et al. 2008) at 6 × 6-km2 resolution over the Po Valley. The modeled daily PM10 concentrations at surface level are compared to observations provided by approximately 50 stations distributed across the domain. The main statistical parameters (i.e., bias, root mean square error, correlation coefficient, standard deviation) as well as different types of diagrams (scatter plots, time series plots, Taylor and target plots) have been produced. A representation of the observation uncertainty in the target plot, used to derive model performance criteria for the main statistical indicators, is also presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AQD (2008) Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (no. 152). Official Journal

  • Borrego C, Monteiro A, Ferreira J, Miranda AI, Costa AM, Carvalho AC, Lopes M (2008) Procedures for estimation of modelling uncertainty in air quality assessment. Environ Int 34:613e–620e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boylan JW, Russell AG (2006) PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models. Atmos Environ 40:4946e–4959e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale C, Decanini E, Volta M (2008) Design and validation of a multiphase 3D model to simulate tropospheric pollution. Sci Total Environ 390:166–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale C, Finzi G, Pisoni E, Thunis P, Volta M (2012) The impact of thermodynamic module in the CTM performances. Atmos Environ 61:652–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter WPL (1990) A detailed mechanism for the gas-phase atmospheric reactions of organic compounds. Atmos Environ 24A:481–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chemel C, Sokhi RS, Yu Y, Hayman GD, Vincent KJ, Dore AJ, Tang YS, Prain HD, Fisher BEA (2010) Evaluation of a CMAQ simulation at high resolution over the UK for the calendar year 2003. Atmos Environ 44:2927e–2939e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuvelier C, Thunis P, Vautard R, Amann M, Bessagnet B, Bedogni M, Berkowicz R, Brandt J, Brocheton F, Builtjes P, Carnevale C, Denby B, Douros J, Graf A, Hellmuth O, Hodzic A, Honore C, Jonson J, Kerschbaumer A, de Leeuw F, Minguzzi E, Moussiopoulos N, Pertot C, Peuch VH, Pirovano G, Rouil L, Sauter F, Schaap M, Stern R, Tarrason L, Vignati E, Volta M, White L, Wind P, Zuber A (2007) CityDelta: a model intercomparison study to explore the impact of emission reductions in European cities in 2010. Atmos Environ 41(1):189–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly A, Zannetti P (2007) Air pollution modeling—an overview. In: Zannetti P, Al-Ajmi D, Al-Rashied S (eds) Ambient air pollution, chapter 2.

  • Denby B (2010) Guidance on the use of models for the European Air Quality Directive. A working document of the Forum for Air Quality Modelling in Europe FAIRMODE (ETC./ACC No. version 6.2)

  • Derwent D, Fraser A, Abbott J, Willis P, Murrells T (2010) Evaluating the performance of air quality models (No. Issue 3). Department for Environment and Rural Affairs

  • ECWG (2010) Guide to the demonstrations of equivalence of ambient air monitoring methods

  • EPA (2005) EPA's guideline on air. Quality models (“guideline”). http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/appw_05.pdf

  • Fountoukis C, Nenes A, Sullivan A, Weber R, VanReken T, Fischer M, Matias E, Moya M, Farmer D, Cohen R (2009) Thermodynamic characterization of Mexico City aerosol during MILAGRO 2006. Atmos Chem Phys 9:2141–2156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilardoni S, Vignati E, Cavalli F, Putaud JP, Larsen BR, Karl M, Stenström K, Genberg J, Henne S, Dentener F (2011) Better constraints on sources of carbonaceous aerosols using a combined 14C–macro tracer analysis in a European rural background site. Atmos Chem Phys Discus 11(1):2503–2547. doi:10.5194/acpd-11-2503-2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holstag AAM, Nieuwstadt FTM (1986) Scaling the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 36:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliff JK, Kindle JC, Shulman I, Penta B, Friedrichs MAM, Helber R, Arnone RA (2009) Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment. J Mar Syst 76:64e–82e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchuk G (1975) Methods of numerical mathematics. Editor: Springer-Verlag, New York, NY

  • Nenes A, Pandis S, Pilinis C (1998) ISORROPIA: a new thermodynamic equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols. Aquat Geochem 4(416):123–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pederzoli A, Thunis P, Georgieva E, Carruthers D, Borge R, Pernigotti D (2012) Performance criteria for the benchmarking of air quality model regulatory applications: the “target” approach. International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP), vol. 50, Nos. 1/2/3/4, 2012

  • Pepper DW, Kern CD, Long PE (1979) Modelling the dispersion of atmospheric pollution using cubic splines and Chapeau functions. Atmos Environ 13:223–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernigotti D, Georgieva E, Thunis P, Cuvelier C, De Meij A (2012) The impact of meteorology on air quality simulations over the Po Valley in northern Italy. Atmos Environ 51:303–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pernigotti D, Thunis P, Gerboles M, Belis CA (2013a) Model quality objectives based on measurement uncertainty. Part II: NO2 and PM10. Atmos Environ 79:869–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pernigotti D, Thunis P, Cuvelier C, Georgieva E, Gsella A, De Meij A, Pirovano G, Balzarini A, Riva GM, Carnevale C, Pisoni E, Volta M, Bessagnet B, Kerschbaumer A, Viaene P, De Ridder K, Nyiri A, Wind P (2013b) POMI: a model inter-comparison exercise over the Po Valley. Air Qual Atmos Health 6(4):701–715

  • Rossa AM, Ferrario ME, Sansone M, Monai M (2012) Climatology of the static stability of the night-time Po Valley pbl from radio sondes and passive microwave radiometers. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling, L'Aquila, Italy, September 2012. ISBN: 978-90-815839-4-7

  • Scire JS, Insley EM, Yamartino RJ (1990) Model formulation and user’s guide for the CALMET meteorological model. Technical report, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento

  • Stow CA, Jolliff J, McGillicuddy DJ, Doney SC, Allen, JI, Friedrichs MAM, Rose KA, Wallhead P (2009) Skill assessment for coupled biological/physical models of marine systems. J Mar Syst 76, 4e15

  • Thunis P, Triacchini G, White L, Maffeis G, Volta M (2009) Air pollution and emission reductions over the Po-Valley: air quality modelling and integrated assessment. Proceedings of the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia, 13–17 July 2009

  • Thunis P, Cuvelier C, Roberts P, White L, Nyiri A, Stern R, Kerschbaumer A, Bessagnet B, Bergström R, Schaap M (2010) EURODELTA: evaluation of a sectoral approach to integrated assessment. Modelling—second report. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1301907090_lbna24474enc_002.pdf?PHPSESSID=75bb8ddcaca78c97a1777f06549d5065

  • Thunis P, Georgieva E, Pederzoli A (2012a) A FAIRMODE benchmarking tool to evaluate air quality model performances in regulatory applications. Environ Model Softw 38:220–230 (December 2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thunis P, Pederzoli A, Pernigotti D (2012b) Performance criteria for evaluating air quality model applications for policy use. Atmos Environ 59:476–482 (November 2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thunis P, Pederzoli A, Georgieva E, Cuvelier C, Pernigotti D (2012c) DELTA V3.2 user’s guide. http://aqm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DELTA/Publications.htm

  • Thunis P, Pernigotti D, Gerboles M, Belis C (2013) Model quality objectives based on measurement uncertainty. Part I: O3. Atmos Environ 79:861–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamartino RJ, Scire JS, Carmichael GR, Chang YS (1992) The CALGRID mesoscale photochemical grid model—I. Model formulation. Atmos Environ 26A:1493–1512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pederzoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carnevale, C., Finzi, G., Pederzoli, A. et al. Applying the delta tool to support the Air Quality Directive: evaluation of the TCAM chemical transport model. Air Qual Atmos Health 7, 335–346 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0240-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0240-4

Keywords

Navigation