Abstract
Pollination is a crucial plant–animal interaction in ecosystems, and moths (Lepidoptera) are a widespread and species-rich group of flower visitors. In this article, plant and moth species connected via pollination interactions were identified from the literature, and information on the relevance of moth pollination in various ecosystems, including agro-ecosystems, was compiled, particularly for Europe and North America. Overall, 227 moth–flower pollination interactions were found, including certain specialized relationships between plants and pollinating seed predators. Most of the interactions could be attributed to the moth families Noctuidae (90 interactions, 56 species) and Sphingidae (85 interactions, 32 species), and to the plant families Orchidaceae (109 interactions, 22 species) and Caryophyllaceae (59 interactions, 16 species). Limited information is available on the role of moth pollination in natural ecosystems (7 studies). In temperate agro-ecosystems, moths are most likely not essential to crop pollination, but they can contribute to the pollination of non-crop plants, which are crucial to maintaining biodiversity in these ecosystems. In general, the role of moths as pollinators appears to be underestimated because only a few studies on moth pollination are available, and long-term, ecosystem-scale research is necessary to address temporal fluctuations in their abundance and community composition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrol DP (2012) Non bee pollinators–plant interaction. In: Abrol DP (ed) Pollination biology: biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. Springer, New York, pp 265–310
Alarcón R, Davidowitz G, Bronstein JL (2008a) Nectar usage in a southern Arizona hawkmoth community. Ecol Entomol 33:503–509
Alarcón R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008b) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117:1796–1807
Allen-Wardell G, Bernhardt P, Bitner R, Burquez A, Buchmann S, Cane J, Cox PA, Dalton V, Feinsinger P, Ingram M, Inouye D, Jones CE, Kennedy K, Kevan P, Koopowitz H, Medellin R, Medellin-Morales S, Nabhan GP, Pavlik B, Tepedino V, Torchio P, Walker S (1998) The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conserv Biol 12:8–17
Argue CL (2012) Pollination biology of North American Orchids, vol 1: North of Florida and Mexico. Springer, New York
Atwater MM (2013) Diversity and nectar hosts of flower-settling moths within a Florida sandhill ecosystem. J Nat Hist 47:2719–2734
Banza P, Belo ADF, Evans DM (2015) The structure and robustness of nocturnal Lepidopteran pollen-transfer networks in a biodiversity hotspot. Insect Conserv Divers 8:538–546
Barthelmess EL, Richards CM, McCauley DE (2006) Relative effects of nocturnal vs diurnal pollinators and distance on gene flow in small Silene alba populations. New Phytol 169:689–698
Bernasconi G, Antonovics J, Biere A, Charlesworth D, Delph LF, Filatov D, Giraud T, Hood ME, Marais GAB, McCauley D, Pannell JR, Shykoff JA, Vyskot B, Wolfe LM, Widmer A (2009) Silene as a model system in ecology and evolution. Heredity 103:5–14
Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354
Bloch D, Werdenberg N, Erhardt A (2006) Pollination crisis in the butterfly-pollinated wild carnation Dianthus carthusianorum? New Phytol 169:699–706
Bopp S (2003) Parasitism or symbiosis? Interactions between a parasitic pollinator (Hadena bicruris Hufn., Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its host plants (Silene species, Caryophyllaceae). Zoologica (Stuttgart) 152:1–140
Borkowsky C, Westwood AR (2009) Seed capsule production in the endangered Western Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera praeclara) in relation to sphinx moth (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) activity. J Lepid Soc 63:110–117
Brittain C, Kremen C, Klein AM (2013) Biodiversity buffers pollination from changes in environmental conditions. Glob Change Biol 19:540–547
Buchmann SL, Nabhan GP (1997) The forgotten pollinators. Island Press, Washington
Burkhardt A, Delph LF, Bernasconi G (2009) Benefits and costs to pollinating, seed-eating insects: the effect of flower size and fruit abortion on larval performance. Oecologia 161:87–98
Cahenzli F, Erhardt A (2013) Nectar amino acids enhance reproduction in male butterflies. Oecologia 171:197–205
Castillo DM, Kula AAR, Dotterl S, Dudash MR, Fenster CB (2014) Invasive Silene latifolia may benefit from a native pollinating seed predator, Hadena ectypa, in North America. Int J Plant Sci 175:80–91
Catling PM, Catling VR (1991) A synopsis of breeding systems and pollination in North American orchids. Lindleyana 6:187–210
Clinebell RR, Crowe A, Gregory DP, Hoch PC (2004) Pollination ecology of Gaura and Calylophus (Onagraceae, Tribe Onagreae) in western Texas, USA. Ann Mo Bot Gard 91:369–400
Coates MT (1977) Butterflies and pollination. Hastings East Sussex Nat 12:37–42
Cuautle M, Thompson JN (2010) Diversity of floral visitors to sympatric Lithophragma species differing in floral morphology. Oecologia 162:71–80
Cutler GC, Reeh KW, Sproule JM, Ramanaidu K (2012) Berry unexpected: nocturnal pollination of lowbush blueberry. Can J Plant Sci 92:707–711
Devoto M, Bailey S, Memmott J (2011) The ‘night shift’: nocturnal pollen-transport networks in a boreal pine forest. Ecol Entomol 36:25–35
Dodd RJ, Linhart YB (1994) Reproductive consequences of interactions between Yucca glauca (Agavaceae) and Tegeticula yuccasella (Lepidoptera) in Colorado. Am J Bot 81:815–825
Ebert G (ed) (1994) Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Nachtfalter I. Vol. 3. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Fleming TH, Holland JN (1998) The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: senita cactus and senita moth. Oecologia 114:368–375
Fox R (2012) The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes. Insect Conserv Divers 6:5–19
Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Carvalheiro LG, Harder LD, Afik O, Bartomeus I, Benjamin F, Boreux V, Cariveau D, Chacoff NP, Dudenhoffer JH, Freitas BM, Ghazoul J, Greenleaf S, Hipolito J, Holzschuh A, Howlett B, Isaacs R, Javorek SK, Kennedy CM, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Mandelik Y, Mayfield MM, Motzke I, Munyuli T, Nault BA, Otieno M, Petersen J, Pisanty G, Potts SG, Rader R, Ricketts TH, Rundlof M, Seymour CL, Schuepp C, Szentgyorgyi H, Taki H, Tscharntke T, Vergara CH, Viana BF, Wanger TC, Westphal C, Williams N, Klein AM (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339:1608–1611
Gimenez-Benavides L, Dötterl S, Jurgens A, Escudero A, Iriondo JM (2007) Generalist diurnal pollination provides greater fitness in a plant with nocturnal pollination syndrome: assessing the effects of a Silene–Hadena interaction. Oikos 116:1461–1472
Grant V (1983) The systematic and geographical distribution of hawkmoth flowers in the temperate North American flora. Bot Gaz 144:439–449
Grant V (1985) Additional observations on temperate North American hawkmoth flowers. Bot Gaz 146:517–520
Haber WA, Frankie GW (1989) A tropical hawkmoth community: Costa Rican dry forest Sphingidae. Biotropica 21:155–172
Hamm A, Wittmann D (2009) Pollinator group: butterflies, moth order: Lepidoptera. In: Ssymank A, Hamm A, Vischer-Leopold M (eds) Caring for pollinators. Safeguarding agro-biodiversity and wild plant diversity. Results of a workshop and research project commissioned by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, vol 250. BfN-Skripten, Bonn, pp 163–166
Holland JN, Fleming TH (1999) Mutualistic interactions between Upiga virescens (Pyralidae), a pollinating seed-consumer, and Lophocereus schottii (Cactaceae). Ecology 80:2074–2084
Holland JN, Fleming TH (2002) Co-pollinators and specialization in the pollinating seed-consumer mutualism between senita cacti and senita moths. Oecologia 133:534–540
Jennersten O (1984) Flower visitation and pollination efficiency of some North European butterflies. Oecologia (Berlin) 63:80–89
Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G (1996) Reproduction and pollination in central European populations of Silene and Saponaria species. Bot Acta 109:316–324
Kato M, Takimura A, Kawakita A (2003) An obligate pollination mutualism and reciprocal diversification in the tree genus Glochidion (Euphorbiaceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5264–5267
Kawakita A (2010) Evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the tribe Phyllantheae (Phyllanthaceae). Plant Spec Biol 25:3–19
Kawakita A, Kato M (2006) Assessment of the diversity and species specificity of the mutualistic association between Epicephala moths and Glochidion trees. Mol Ecol 15:3567–3581
Kawakita A, Kato M (2009) Repeated independent evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the Phyllantheae–Epicephala association. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:417–426
Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112
Kephart S, Reynolds RJ, Rutter MT, Fenster CB, Dudash MR (2006) Pollination and seed predation by moths on Silene and allied Caryophyllaceae: evaluating a model system to study the evolution of mutualisms. New Phytol 169:667–680
Kevan PG (1999) Pollinators as bioindicators of the state of the environment: species, activity and diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:373–393
Kevan PG, Baker HG (1983) Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu Rev Entomol 28:407–453
King C, Ballantyne G, Willmer PG (2013) Why flower visitation is a poor proxy for pollination: measuring single-visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation. Methods Ecol Evol 4:811–818
Kluser S, Pedizzi P (2007) Global pollinator decline: a literature review. UNEP/GRID-Europe, Geneva
Kula AAR, Castillo DM, Dudash MR, Fenster CB (2014) Interactions between a pollinating seed predator and its host plant: the role of environmental context within a population. Ecol Evol 4:2901–2912
Labouche AM, Bernasconi G (2010) Male moths provide pollination benefits in the Silene latifolia–Hadena bicruris nursery pollination system. Funct Ecol 24:534–544
LeCroy KA, Shew HW, Van Zandt PA (2013) Pollen presence on nocturnal moths in the ketona dolomite glades of Bibb County, Alabama. South Lepidopterists’ News 35:136–142
Levin DA, Berube DE (1972) Phlox and Colias: the efficiency of a pollination system. Evolution 26:242–250
Maad J, Nilsson LA (2004) On the mechanism of floral shifts in speciation: gained pollination efficiency from tongue- to eye-attachment of pollinia in Platanthera (Orchidaceae). Biol J Linn Soc 83:481–495
Macgregor CJ, Pocock MJO, Fox R, Evans DM (2014) Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: a review. Ecol Entomol 40:187–198
Martins DJ (2014) Butterfly pollination of the dryland wildflower Gloriosa minor. J East Afr Nat Hist 103:25–30
Merckx T, Marini L, Feber RE, Macdonald DW (2012) Hedgerow trees and extended-width field margins enhance macro-moth diversity: implications for management. J Appl Ecol 49:1396–1404
Mevi-Schütz J, Erhardt A (2005) Amino acids in nectar enhance butterfly fecundity: a long-awaited link. Am Nat 165:411–419
Murphy DD (1984) Butterflies and their nectar plants: the role of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha as a pollen vector. Oikos 43:113–117
Nazarov V, Buchsbaum U (2004) Widderchen als Bestäuber von Orchideen in Thüringen (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae). Entomofauna 25:365–372
New TR (2004) Moth (Insecta: Lepidoptera) and conservation: background and perspective. J Insect Conserv 8:79–94
Okamoto T, Kawakita A, Kato M (2008) Floral adaptations to nocturnal moth pollination in Diplomorpha (Thymelaeaceae). Plant Spec Biol 23:192–201
Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326
Pellmyr O (1997) Pollinating seed eaters: why is active pollination so rare? Ecology 78:1655–1660
Pellmyr O (2003) Yuccas, yucca moths, and coevolution: a review. Ann Mo Bot Gard 90:35–55
Pellmyr O, Segraves KA (2003) Pollinator divergence within an obligate mutualism: two yucca moth species (Lepidoptera; Prodoxidae: Tegeticula) on the joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia; Agavaceae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 96:716–722
Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol Lett 11:564–575
Pettersson MW (1991) Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. J Ecol 79:591–604
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353
Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:2959–2971
Reynolds RJ, Kula AAR, Fenster CB, Dudash MR (2012) Variable nursery pollinator importance and its effect on plant reproductive success. Oecologia 168:439–448
Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Bogdanski A, Gemmill-Herren B, Greenleaf SS, Klein AM, Mayfield MM, Morandin LA, Ochieng A, Viana BF (2008) Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol Lett 11:499–515
Shields O (1989) World numbers of butterflies. J Lepid Soc 43:178–183
Sime KR, Baldwin IT (2003) Opportunistic out-crossing in Nicotiana attenuata (Solanaceae), a predominantly self-fertilizing native tobacco. BMC Ecol 3:1–9
Stoate C, Baldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, de Snoo GR, Rakosy L, Ramwell C (2009) Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—a review. J Environ Manag 91:22–46
Storkey J, Meyer S, Still KS, Leuschner C (2012) The impact of agricultural intensification and land-use change on the European arable flora. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:1421–1429
Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1992) Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: constraints on specialization. Ecology 73:1780–1791
Travers SE, Fauske GM, Fox K, Ross AA, Harris MO (2011) The hidden benefits of pollinator diversity for the rangelands of the Great Plains: western prairie fringed orchids as a case study. Rangelands 33:20–26
United States Department of Agriculture [USDA] (2011) Summary Table 1—major uses of land, by region and State, United States, 2007. http://ers.usda.gov/data-products/major-land-uses.aspx#25988. Last updated 19 Dec 2011
von Arx M, Sullivan KA, Raguso RA (2013) Dual fitness benefits of post-mating sugar meals for female hawkmoths (Hyles lineata). J Insect Physiol 59:458–465
Westerbergh A (2004) An interaction between a specialized seed predator moth and its dioecious host plant shifting from parasitism to mutualism. Oikos 105:564–574
Westwood AR, Borkowsky CL (2004) Sphinx moth pollinators for the endangered western prairie fringed orchid, Platanthera praeclara in Manitoba, Canada. J Lepid Soc 58:13–20
Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Young HJ (2002) Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 89:433–440
Zhang J, Wang SX, Li HH, Hu BB, Yang XF, Wang ZB (2012) Diffuse coevolution between two Epicephala species (Gracillariidae) and two Breynia species (Phyllanthaceae). PLoS One 7:1–9
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a funding program for scientists (NaWi) of the Interdisciplinary Graduate Center (IPZ), University Koblenz-Landau, granted to M. Hahn. The authors thank J. Schmitz and P. Stahlschmidt for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Heikki Hokkanen.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hahn, M., Brühl, C.A. The secret pollinators: an overview of moth pollination with a focus on Europe and North America. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 10, 21–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-016-9414-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-016-9414-3