Log in

Seismic fragility assessment of low-rise stone masonry buildings

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many historic buildings in old urban centers in Eastern Canada are made of stone masonry reputed to be highly vulnerable to seismic loads. Seismic risk assessment of stone masonry buildings is therefore the first step in the risk mitigation process to provide adequate planning for retrofit and preservation of historical urban centers. This paper focuses on development of analytical displacement-based fragility curves reflecting the characteristics of existing stone masonry buildings in Eastern Canada. The old historic center of Quebec City has been selected as a typical study area. The standard fragility analysis combines the inelastic spectral displacement, a structure-dependent earthquake intensity measure, and the building damage state correlated to the induced building displacement. The proposed procedure consists of a three-step development process: (1) mechanics-based capacity model, (2) displacement-based damage model and (3) seismic demand model. The damage estimation for a uniform hazard scenario of 2% in 50 years probability of exceedance indicates that slight to moderate damage is the most probable damage experienced by these stone masonry buildings. Comparison is also made with fragility curves implicit in the seismic risk assessment tools Hazus and ELER. Hazus shows the highest probability of the occurrence of no to slight damage, whereas the highest probability of extensive and complete damage is predicted with ELER. This comparison shows the importance of the development of fragility curves specific to the generic construction characteristics in the study area and emphasizes the need for critical use of regional risk assessment tools and generated results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abo-El-Ezz A, Nollet MJ and Nastev M (2011), “Analytical Displacement-based Seismic Fragility Analysis of Stone Masonry Buildings,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Corfu, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams J and Halchuk S (2003), “Fourth Generation Seismic Hazard Maps of Canada: Values for Over 650 Canadian Localities Intended for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada,” Open File No. 4459, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron-Corverra R (2000), “Spectral Evaluation of Seismic Fragility in Structures,” PhD Dissertation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzi B, Crowley H and Pinho R (2008), “Simplified Pushover-based Earthquake Loss Assessment (SPBELA) Method for Masonry Buildings,” International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2(4): 353–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosiljkov V, Page A, Bosiljkov B and Žarnić R (2010), “Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of Brick Masonry Walls,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 17(1): 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvi GM (1999), “A Displacement-based Approach for Vulnerability Evaluation of Classes of Buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3(3): 411–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidiac SE, Foo S and Cheung MS (2000), “Seismic Guidelines for Stone-masonry Components and Structures,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Seismic Performance of Traditional Buildings, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choun YS and Elnashai AS (2010), “A Simplified Framework for Probabilistic Earthquake Loss Estimation,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 25(4): 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn A and Spence R (2002), Earthquake Protection, 2nd Edition, J. Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elmenshawi AE, Sorour M, Mufti A, Jaeger L and Shrive, N (2010), “In-plane Seismic Behaviour of Historic Stone Masonry,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37(3): 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erberik MA (2008), “Generation of Fragility Curves for Turkish Masonry Buildings Considering In-plane Failure Modes,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37(3): 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erberik MA and Elnashai AS (2004), “Fragility Analysis of Flat-slab Structures,” Engineering Structures, 26(7): 937–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu M, Hancilar U, Zulfikar C, Cakti E and Cagnan Z (2010), “Rapid Earthquake Hazard and Loss Assessment for Euro-Mediterranean Region,” Acta Geophysica, 58(1): 855–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (2000), “A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-based Seismic Design,” Earthquake Spectra, 16(3): 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2003), “HAZUS-MH MR4: Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model,” Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Institute of Building Science, Washington, D.C, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2005), “Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures,” Report Number 440, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Applied Technology Council, Washington D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankie T (2010), “Simulation-based Fragility Relationships for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings”, MSc Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gencturk B, Elnashai AS and Song J (2008), “Fragility Relationships for Populations of Woodframe Structures Based on Inelastic Response,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(2), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovinazzi S (2005), “The Vulnerability Assessment and the Damage Scenario in Seismic Risk Analysis”, PhD Dissertation, University of Florence, Italy and Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong SH and Elnashai AS (2007), “Probabilistic Fragility Analysis Parameterized by Fundamental Response Quantities,” Engineering Structures, 29(6): 1238–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kircher CA, Nassar AA, Kustu O and Holmes WT (1997), “Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation,” Earthquake Spectra, 13(4): 663–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang K (2002), “Seismic Vulnerability of Existing Buildings,” PhD Dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre K (2004), “Caracterisation Structurale et Evaluation de la Vulnerabilite Sismique des Batiments Historiques en Maconnerie du Vieux-Montreal», MSc Dissertation, Ecole de Technologie Superieure, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magenes G and Calvi GM (1997), “In-plane Seismic Response of Brick Masonry Walls,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26(11): 1091–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzon N (2010), “Influence of Grout Injection on the Dynamic Behaviour of Stone Masonry Buildings,” PhD Dissertation, University of Padova, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Towashiraporn P, Craig JI and Goodno BJ (2009), “Seismic Fragility Analysis of Low-rise Unreinforced Masonry Structures,” Engineering Structures, 31(1): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo-Vélez LF (2003), “A Simplified Mechanicsbased Procedure for the Seismic Risk Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings,” Individual Study, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk, University of Pavia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rota M, Penna A and Magenes G (2010), “A Methodology for Deriving Analytical Fragility Curves for Masonry Buildings Based on Stochastic Nonlinear Analyses,” Engineering Structures, 32(5): 1312–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-García J and Miranda E (2007), “Probabilistic Estimation of Maximum Inelastic Displacement Demands for Performance-based Design,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(9): 1235–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-García J and Negrete M (2009), “Drift-based Fragility Assessment of Confined Masonry Walls in Seismic Regions,” Engineering Structures, 31(1): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TomaŽevič M (1999), Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings, Innovation in Structures and Construction, Vol. 1, Imperial College Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaževič M and Lutman M (2007), “Heritage Masonry Buildings in Urban Settlements and the Requirements of Eurocodes: Experience of Slovenia,” International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 1(1): 108–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TomaŽevič M and Weiss P (2010), “Displacement Capacity of Masonry Buildings as a Basis for the Assessment of Behavior Factor: an Experimental Study,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(6): 1267–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnšek V and Čačovič F (1971), “Some Experimental Results on the Strength of Brick-masonry Walls”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Brick-masonry Conference, Stoke-on-Trent, UK, pp.149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallieres A (1999), “Processus de Transformation Typologique du bâti Résidentiel dans l’arrondissement Historique du Vieux-Québec,” MSc Dissertation, Laval University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos G (2005), “Experimental Investigations on the Mechanics of Stone Masonry: Characterization of Granites and Behaviour of Ancient Masonry Shear Walls,” PhD Dissertation, University of Minho, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Abo-El-Ezz.

Additional information

Supported by: Natural Resources Canada — Geological Survey of Canada Public Safety Geoscience Program, and the Chemical, Biological, Radiological-Nuclear and Explosives Research and Technology Initiative, administered by the Defence R&D Canada — Centre for Security Science

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abo-El-Ezz, A., Nollet, MJ. & Nastev, M. Seismic fragility assessment of low-rise stone masonry buildings. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 12, 87–97 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0154-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0154-4

Keywords

Navigation