SpringerLink
Log in

Rationale for video-assisted radical esophagectomy

  • Current Topics Review Article
  • Published:
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite many positive reports on video-assisted esophagectomy (VAE) for malignant esophageal tumors, VAE remains a lesser used procedure in Japan because of its technical difficulty and the strong desire of esophageal surgeons for thorough lymphadenectomy. In this article, we review former reports as well as our own experiences to demonstrate the feasibility and rationale for radical VAE as a standard operation for esophageal cancer. Although the reduction of surgical stress is not clear, it has been reported that VAE is associated with lower morbidity related to postoperative pulmonary complications, and we experienced a shorter period of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome. VAE is advantageous not only because it is less invasive but also because of the possibility of a more meticulous operation through the magnifying effect of the surgical field and the alteration of the viewpoint of the surgeon. The number of dissected lymph nodes, a possible indicator of the extensiveness and thoroughness of lymphadenectomy, is reported to be the same for VAE as for conventional thoracotomy by many surgeons, and our experience was no exception. Although it is too early to discuss the prognostic effect, no obvious disadvantage in prognosis has been reported. We are convinced that radical VAE is not inferior in radicality as an operation for esophageal cancer. As the evaluation of radicality and safety of radical VAE differs somewhat from surgeon to surgeon, different attitudes about the indications for radical VAE remain. We cautiously suggest that use of this new procedure should move forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buess G, Becker HD. [Minimally invasive surgery in tumors of the esophagus.] Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1990;1355–1360.

  2. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992;37:7–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Akaishi T, Kaneda I, Higuchi N, Kuriya Y, Kuramoto J, Toyoda T, et al. Thoracoscopic en bloc total esophagectomy with radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:1533–40; discussion 40–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peracchia A, Rosati R, Fumagalli U, Bona S, Chella B. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: are there benefits? Semin Surg Oncol 1997;13:259–262.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dixit AS, Martin CJ, Flynn P. Port-site recurrence after thoracoscopic resection of oesophageal cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 1997;67:148–149.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson GS, Lloyd DM, Wicks AC, Veitch PS. No obvious advantages for thoracoscopic two-stage oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 1996;83:675–678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Osugi H, Takemura M, Lee S, Nishikawa T, Fukuhara K, Iwasaki H, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for intrathoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;11:221–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto S, Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Shiraishi T, Shirakusa T. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2070–2075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg 2007;245:232–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ueda Y, Fujii Y, Udagawa H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2006: annual report by the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;56:365–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 1994;220:364–372; discussion 72–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Tanaka T, Fujii T, Toh U, Mine T, et al. Optimal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus: comparing the short- and longterm outcome among the four types of lymphadenectomy. World J Surg 2003;27:571–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouche O, Milan C, Mariette C, Conroy T, et al. Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1160–1168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Suntharalingam M. Definitive chemoradiation in the management of locally advanced esophageal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2007;17:22–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Udagawa H, Akiyama H. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: Tokyo experience of the three-field technique. Dis Esophagus 2001;14:110–114.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Altorki NK. Extended resections in the management of esophageal carcinoma. Curr Opin Gen Surg 1994;113-6.

  17. Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 2004;240:962–972; discussion 72–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Journo XB, Doddoli C, Michelet P, Loundou A, Trousse D, Giudicelli R, et al. Transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: standard versus extended two-field mediastinal lymphadenectomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:697–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takemura M, Higashino M, Osugi H, Tokuhara T, Fujiwara K, Fukuda Y, et al. Changes of serum cytokine levels after thoracoscopic esophagectomy (in Japanese). Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;46:1305–1310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003;90:108–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, Buenaventura PO, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:402–406; discussion 6–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T, Yamamoto S, Maekawa T. Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1083–1089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Suzuki Y, Urashima M, Ishibashi Y, Abo M, Omura N, Nakada K, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery (HALTS) in radical esophagectomy with threefield lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:1166–1174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position-experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, 2-2-2 Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8470, Japan

    Harushi Udagawa, Masaki Ueno & Yoshihiro Kinoshita

Authors
  1. Harushi Udagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masaki Ueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshihiro Kinoshita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harushi Udagawa.

Additional information

This review was submitted at the invitation of the editorial committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Udagawa, H., Ueno, M. & Kinoshita, Y. Rationale for video-assisted radical esophagectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57, 127–131 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-008-0362-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-008-0362-4

Key words

Search

Navigation