Abstract
This essay explores some of the similarities and differences between the views of several Western and Chinese thinkers on the metaphysical status of moral qualities and how we come to perceive and appreciate them. It then uses this comparative analysis to identify and address some remaining problems in regard to these two issues. The essay offers a brief sketch of and introduction to the history of the study of moral qualities and moral perception in modern Western philosophy and takes the views of John McDowell, Wang Yangming, and Mencius as the primary focus of its comparative component. It seeks to understand the views of these thinkers by a careful examination of the metaphors as well as the arguments they employ.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackburn, Simon. 1984. “Realism and Variations.” In Spreading the Word: Groundings in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Chan, Wing-tsit, tr. 1963. Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings by W ang Yang-ming. New York: Columbia University Press.
De Sousa, Ronald. 1991. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hahn, Songsuk Susan. 2007. Contradiction in Motion: Hegel’s Organic Conception of Life and Value. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1997. “Virtue Theory and Abortion.” In Virtue Ethics. Ed. by Roger Crisp and Michael Slote. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutton, Eric L. 2002. “Moral Connoisseurship in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Ed. by Liu **usheng and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 163–86.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mengzi and W ang Yangming. Second Edition. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
_____ Tr. 2009a. Readings from the Lu-Wang School of Neo-Confucianism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
_____. 2009b. “Pluralism, Toleration, and Ethical Promiscuity.” The Journal of Religious Ethics. 37.2: 311–29.
_____. n.d. “Freud and the Dao.” In China’s Freudian Slip: The Reception and Rendition of Freud in China Ed. by Philip J. Ivanhoe and Jiang Tao. (Ms.)
Mackie, J. L. 1990. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Reprint. London: Penguin Books.
McDowell, John. 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Munro, Donald J. 1988. Images of Human Nature: A Sung Portrait. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stocker, Michael and Elizabeth Hegeman. 1996. Valuing Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tien, David W. 2010. “Metaphysics and the Basis of Morality in the Philosophy of Wang Yangming.” In Dao Companion to Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Ed. by John Makeham. New York: Springer.
_____. 2011. “Oneness and Selflessness in the Moral Psychology of Wang Yangming.” The Journal of Religious Ethics. Forthcoming.
Wallace, R. Jay. 1991. “Virtue, Reason, and Principle.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 21.4: 469–95.
Wenzel, Christian. 2010. “On Wittgenstein’s Notion of Meaning Blindness: Its Subjective, Objective, and Aesthetic Aspects.” Philosophical Investigations. 33.3: 201–19.
Wiggins, David. 1998. Needs, Values, Truth. Third Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanhoe, P.J. McDowell, Wang Yangming, and Mengzi’s Contributions to Understanding Moral Perception. Dao 10, 273–290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-011-9222-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-011-9222-5