SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of natural zeolite and sulfate ions on the mechanical properties and microstructure of plastic concrete

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the strategic materials used in earth-fill embankment dams and in modifying and preventing groundwater flow is plastic concrete (PlC). PlC is comprised of aggregates, water, cement, and bentonite. Natural zeolite (NZ) is a relatively abundant mineral resource and in this research, the microstructure, unconfined strength, triaxial behavior, and permeability of PlC made with 0%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% replacement of cement by NZ were studied. Specimens of PIC-NZ were subjected to confined conditions and three different confining pressures of 200, 350, and 500 kPa were used to investigate their mechanical behavior and permeability. To study the effect of sulfate ions on the properties of PlC-NZ specimens, the specimens were cured in one of two different environments: normal condition and in the presence of sulfate ions. Results showed that increasing the zeolite content decreases the unconfined strength, elastic modulus, and peak strength of PlC-NZ specimens at the early ages of curing. However, at the later ages, increasing the zeolite content increases unconfined strength as well as the peak strength and elastic modulus. Specimens cured in the presence of sulfate ions indicated lower permeability, higher unconfined strength, elastic modulus, and peak strength due to having lower porosity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alós Shepherd D, Kotan E, Dehn F. Plastic concrete for cut-off walls: A review. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 255: 119248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song S, You P. Performance of plastic concrete under true tri-axial compressive stress. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 266: 121106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghanizadeh A R, Abbaslou H, Amlashi A T, Alidoust P. Modeling of bentonite/sepiolite plastic concrete compressive strength using artificial neural network and support vector machine. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(1): 215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amlashi A T, Abdollahi S M, Goodarzi S, Ghanizadeh A R. Soft computing based formulations for slump, compressive strength, and elastic modulus of bentonite plastic concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 230: 1197–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Juenger M C G, Siddique R. Recent advances in understanding the role of supplementary cementitious materials in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 78: 71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wen L, Chai J, Xu Z, Qin Y, Li Y. Comparative and numerical analyses of response of concrete cutoff walls of earthen dams on alluvium foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(10): 04019069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ICOLD. Filling Materials for Watertight Cut off Walls. Paris: International Committee of Large Dams, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feng N Q, Li G Z, Zang X W. High-strength and flowing concrete with a zeolitic mineral admixture. Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 1990, 12(2): 61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soroush A, Soroush M. Parameters affecting the thickness of bentonite cake in cutoff wall construction: Case study and physical modeling. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(2): 646–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bagheri A R, Alibabaie M, Babaie M. Reduction in the permeability of plastic concrete for cut-off walls through utilization of silica fume. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(6): 1247–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jalal M, Fathi M, Farzad M. Effects of fly ash and TiO2 nanoparticles on rheological, mechanical, microstructural and thermal properties of high strength self compacting concrete. Mechanics of Materials, 2013, 61: 11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Damtoft J S, Lukasik J, Herfort D, Sorrentino D, Gartner E M. Sustainable development and climate change initiatives. Cement and Concrete Research, 2008, 38(2): 115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Metha P K, Monteiro P J M. Concrete-Microstructure, Properties and Materials. McGraw-Hill Professional, 2001, 23913

  14. Celik K. Development and characterization of sustainable self-consolidating concrete containing high volume of limestone powder and natural or calcined pozzolanic materials. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ochoa L, Hendrickson C, Asce M, Matthews H S. Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of US residential buildings. Journal of infrastructure systems, 2002, 8(4): 132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Augustine C, Byrne A, Gimon E, Goerner T, Hoffman I, Kammen D M, Kantner J, Levin J, Lipman T, Mileva A, Muren R, Paul S, Sapatari S, Thorsteinsson H, Tominks C. Redefining what’s possible for clean energy by 2020. Gigaton Throwdown, San Francisco, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  17. USGS MCS. Cement Statistics and Information. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Oss H. Minerals Yearbook: Slag-Iron and Steel. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mehta P K. Sustainable cements and concrete for the climate change era—A review. In: 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies. Aneona: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ören A H, Kaya A, Kayalar A Ş. Hydraulic conductivity of zeolite-bentonite mixtures in comparison with sand-bentonite mixtures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(9): 1343–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Giosuè C, Mobili A, Yu Q L, Brouwers H J H, Ruello M L, Tittarelli F. Properties of multifunctional lightweight mortars containing zeolite and natural fibers. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2019, 8(4): 214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Janotka I, Krajči L. Sulphate resistance and passivation ability of the mortar made from pozzolan cement with zeolite. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2008, 94(1): 7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Şahmaran M. The effect of replacement rate and fineness of natural zeolite on the rheological properties of cement-based grouts. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008, 35(8): 796–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vieira G L, Schiavon J Z, Borges P M, da Silva S R, de Oliveira Andrade J J. Influence of recycled aggregate replacement and fly ash content in performance of pervious concrete mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 271: 122665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Öncü Ş, Bilsel H. Effect of zeolite utilization on volume change and strength properties of expansive soil as landfill barrier. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(9): 1320–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li F, Zhou C, Yang P, Wang B, Hu J, Wei J, Yu Q. Direct synthesis of carbon nanotubes on fly ash particles to produce carbon nanotubes/fly ash composites. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1405–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun D, Shi H, Wu K, Miramini S, Li B, Zhang L. Influence of aggregate surface treatment on corrosion resistance of cement composite under chloride attack. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 248: 118636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Neville A. The confused world of sulfate attack on concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(8): 1275–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. ACI Committee 201. Guide to Durable Concrete. American Concrete Institute, 2001

  30. Haufe J, Vollpracht A. Tensile strength of concrete exposed to sulfate attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 116: 81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen J, Bharata R, Yin T, Wang Q, Wang H, Zhang T. Assessment of sulfate attack and freeze-thaw cycle damage of cement-based materials by a nonlinear acoustic technique. Materials and Structures, 2017, 50(2): 105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rasheeduzzafar, Al-Amoudi O S B, Abduljauwad S N, Maslehuddin M. Magnesium-sodium sulfate attack in plain and blended cements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1994, 6(2): 201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Barger G S, Bayles J, Blair B, Brown D, Chen H, Conway T, Hawkins P. Ettringite formation and the performance of concrete. Portland Cement Association, 2001: 1–16

  34. ASTM. Standard Specification for Portland Cement, ASTM C150. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  35. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Exchange Complex and Cation Exchange Capacity of Inorganic Fine-Grained Soils 1, ASTM D7503-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  36. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on Cohesive Soils, ASTM D2850-3a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  37. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, ASTM D2166. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mahboubi A, Ajorloo A. Experimental study of the mechanical behavior of plastic concrete in triaxial compression. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(2): 412–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu S, Shan J, Zhang L, Zhou L, Gao G, Hu S, Wang P. Dynamic compression behaviors of concrete under true triaxial confinement: An experimental technique. Mechanics of Materials, 2020, 140: 103220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Piotrowska E, Malecot Y, Ke Y. Experimental investigation of the effect of coarse aggregate shape and composition on concrete triaxial behavior. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 79: 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fu Z, Su H, Wen Z. Multi-scale numerical analysis for linear elastic behavior of clay concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2020, 203: 23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hinchberger S, Weck J, Newson T. Mechanical and hydraulic characterization of plastic concrete for seepage cut-off walls. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2010, 47(4): 461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun D, Wu K, Shi H, Miramini S, Zhang L. Deformation behaviour of concrete materials under the sulfate attack. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 210: 232–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sun D, Wu K, Shi H, Zhang L, Zhang L. Effect of interfacial transition zone on the transport of sulfate ions in concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 192: 28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Metha P K, Monteiro P J M. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  46. Badogiannis E, Kakali G, Dimopoulou G, Chaniotakis E, Tsivilis S. Metakaolin as a main cement constituent. Exploitation of poor Greek kaolins. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2005, 27(2): 197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Perraki T, Kontori E, Tsivilis S, Kakali G. The effect of zeolite on the properties and hydration of blended cements. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(2): 128–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Perraki T, Kakali G, Kontori E. Characterization and pozzolanic activity of thermally treated zeolite. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2005, 82(1): 109–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Demir F, Armagan Korkmaz K. Prediction of lower and upper bounds of elastic modulus of high strength concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2008, 22(7): 1385–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu X, Feng P, Li W, Geng G, Huang J, Gao Y, Mu S, Hong J. Effects of pH on the nano/micro structure of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) under sulfate attack. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 140: 106306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang S, Wen Y, Fei K. Effects of pH and EC on the strength and permeability of plastic concrete cutoff walls. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2021, 28(31): 42798–42806

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, 34149-16818, Iran

    Ali Akbarpour, Mahdi Mahdikhani & Reza Ziaie Moayed

Authors
  1. Ali Akbarpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mahdi Mahdikhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reza Ziaie Moayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Akbarpour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akbarpour, A., Mahdikhani, M. & Moayed, R.Z. Effects of natural zeolite and sulfate ions on the mechanical properties and microstructure of plastic concrete. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 16, 86–98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0793-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0793-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation