Abstract
Surgical resection is the optimal procedure for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Open thoracotomy, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) are different surgical modalities with possible different outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze differences in outcome with a focus on postoperative pain. Patients undergoing lobectomy at the Maasstad Hospital in 2015 and 2016 were included. Postoperative pain was scored according to the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Additionally, duration of chest tube drainage and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), hospital length of stay and type of surgery were assessed. Lobectomy was performed in 57 patients. There was no significant difference in type of surgery, age, gender, right-sided surgery, postoperative NRS scores, duration of chest tube drainage and epidural anesthesia, and hospital length of stay (p > 0.05). Operative time for RATS was significantly longer (p = 0.002). Postoperative pain scores and other outcomes did not differ between the three different modalities in surgery for NSCLC. In the future, more minimally invasive surgery will be used in pulmonary surgery with thoracotomy as a safe alternative in selected cases. Future studies have to demonstrate if RATS will overcome the differences concerning cost-effectiveness over VATS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walker WS, Carnochan FM, Pugh GC (1993) Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1111-1117
Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27:2553–2562
Wei S, Chen M, Chen N, Liu L (2017) Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 15:98
Wei B, D'Amico TA (2014) Thoracoscopic versus robotic approaches: advantages and disadvantages. Thorac Surg Clin 24:177–88 vi
Agzarian J, Fahim C, Shargall Y, Yasufuku K, Waddell TK, Hanna WC (2016) The use of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for lung resection: a comprehensive systematic review. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 28:182–192
Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Yan TD (2012) A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 1:16–23
Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Yan TD (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 1:3–10
Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S (2014) Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg 97:236-242 (discussion 42-4)
Diederich S (2010) Lung cancer staging update: the revised TNM classification. Cancer Imaging 10(A):S134–S135
Leandro JD, Rodrigues OR, Slaets AF, Schmidt AF Jr, Yaekashi ML (2014) Comparison between two thoracotomy closure techniques: postoperative pain and pulmonary function. J Bras Pneumol. 40:389–396
Emmert A, Straube C, Buentzel J, Roever C (2017) Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e7633
Williamson A, Hoggart B (2005) Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14:798–804
Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Boyd D, Chew C, MacDonald N et al (2017) Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br J Anaesth. 118:424–429
Obuchi T, Yoshida Y, Moroga T, Miyahara N, Iwasaki A (2017) Postoperative pain in thoracic surgery: re-evaluating the benefits of VATS when coupled with epidural analgesia. J Thorac Dis 9:4347–4352
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2011) Optimal care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer reduces perioperative morbidity. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:22–33
Bendixen M, Jorgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB (2016) Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17:836–844
Akter F, Routledge T, Toufektzian L, Attia R (2015) In minor and major thoracic procedures is uniport superior to multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 20:550–555
Muraoka M, Oka T, Akamine S, Tagawa T, Nakamura A, Hashizume S et al (2006) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy reduces the morbidity after surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54:49–55
Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA (2000) VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 70:243–247
Jang HJ, Lee HS, Park SY, Zo JI (2011) Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila) 6:305–310
Lee BE, Korst RJ, Kletsman E, Rutledge JR (2014) Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147:724–729
Louie BE, Wilson JL, Kim S, Cerfolio RJ, Park BJ, Farivar AS et al (2016) Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches for clinical stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Ann Thorac Surg 102:917–924
Farivar AS, Cerfolio RJ, Vallieres E, Knight AW, Bryant A, Lingala V et al (2014) Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Innovations (Phila) 9:10–15
Yang CF, Sun Z, Speicher PJ, Saud SM, Gulack BC, Hartwig MG et al (2016) Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Thorac Surg. 101:1037–1042
Veronesi G, Novellis P, Voulaz E, Alloisio M (2016) Robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer: state of the art and perspectives. Lung Cancer 101:28–34
Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:297–300 vii
Augustin F, Bodner J, Maier H, Schwinghammer C, Pichler B, Lucciarini P, et al. (2013) Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:895–901.
Suda T (2017) Transition from video-assisted thoracic surgery to robotic pulmonary surgery. J Vis Surg 3:55
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors Dr. van der Ploeg, Dr. Ayez, Drs. Akkersdijk, Dr. van Rossem and Drs. de Rooij declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Ploeg, A.P.T., Ayez, N., Akkersdijk, G.P. et al. Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery. J Robotic Surg 14, 131–136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00953-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00953-y