SpringerLink
Log in

Transoral robotic surgery using the Medrobotic Flex® system: the Adelaide experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has become an accepted treatment option for a variety of benign and malignant pathologies of the head and neck. The Medrobotics Flex® system is a novel single port platform available as an alternative tool to current multiport robotic technology. We present the Adelaide experience with this system thus far. The Medrobotics Flex® system was introduced in Adelaide in January 2017. Patient demographics, pathology, indication for surgery and complications are prospectively recorded for all cases. The first 20 patients are presented in this case series. 11/20 underwent surgery for malignant disease. Of these nine were diagnosed with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Histopathology revealed clear margins of primary tumour excision in 8/9 patients. There were no intraoperative complications. In terms of secondary complications, one patient undergoing tonsillectomy for recurrent tonsillitis experienced a secondary haemorrhage at day 13 following operation and one patient undergoing lateral oropharyngectomy for pT3N2b tonsillar SCC sustained an oro-cervical fistula, which settled with conservative management. We have found the Medrobotic Flex® system to be a safe, reliable tool for managing transoral surgery. The range of pathology managed with this platform, as well as the histologic outcomes presented, demonstrates efficacy in the oropharynx and posterior oral cavity for both benign and malignant disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaturvedi AK, Anderson WF, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Worldwide trends in incidence rates for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. J Clin Oncol 31:4550–4559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schache AG, Powell NG, Cuschieri KS et al (2016) HPV-related oropharynx cancer in the United Kingdom: an evolution in the understanding of disease etiology. Cancer Res 76:6598–6606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM et al (2011) Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29:4294–4301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Givens DJ, Karnell LH, Gupta AK et al (2009) Adverse events associated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:1209–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huet PC (1951) Electrocoagulation in epitheliomas of the tonsils. Ann Otolaryngol 68:433–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steiner WAP (2000) Endoscopic laser surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract: with special emphasis on cancer surgery, 1 edn. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Hockstein NG (2005) Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope 115:1315–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope 122:1701–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (2015) Transoral robotic surgery: a review of clinical and cost-effectiveness. Context and Policy Issues, Ottawa. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK269429/

  10. Hoffmann TK, Schuler PJ, Bankfalvi A et al (2014) Comparative analysis of resection tools suited for transoral robot-assisted surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:1207–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yarlgadda BB, Grillone GA (2015) Anatomical considerations in transoral robotic surgery. In: Grillone GA, Jalisi S (eds) Robotic surgery of the head and neck: a comprehensive guide. Springer, New York, pp 13–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson PJ, Rivera Serrano CM, Castro M et al (2013) Demonstration of transoral surgery in cadaveric specimens with the medrobotics flex system. Laryngoscope 123:1168–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mattheis S, Hasskamp P, Holtmann L et al (2017) Flex robotic system in transoral robotic surgery: the first 40 patients. Head Neck 39:471–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schuler PJ, Duvvuri U, Friedrich DT, Rotter N, Scheithauer MO, Hoffmann TK (2015) First use of a computer-assisted operator-controlled flexible endoscope for transoral surgery. Laryngoscope 125:645–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mallampati SR (1983) Clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation (hypothesis). Can Anaesth Soc J 30:316–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia

    Neeraj Sethi, Michael Gouzos, Vikram Padhye, Andrew Foreman, Suren Krishnan & J. C. Hodge

  2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia

    E. H. Ooi

Authors
  1. Neeraj Sethi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Gouzos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vikram Padhye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. H. Ooi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrew Foreman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Suren Krishnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. C. Hodge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Hodge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Neeraj Sethi declares that they have no conflict of interest. Author Michael Gouzos declares that they have no conflict of interest. Author Vikram Padhye declares that they have no conflict of interest. Author Andrew Foreman declares that they have no conflict of interest. Author E. H. Ooi declares that they have no conflicts of interest. Author Suren Krishnan has received educational grants from Medrobotic. Author J.C. Hodge has received educational grants from Medrobotic.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This paper is not based on previous communications to a society or a meeting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sethi, N., Gouzos, M., Padhye, V. et al. Transoral robotic surgery using the Medrobotic Flex® system: the Adelaide experience. J Robotic Surg 14, 109–113 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00941-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00941-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation