Log in

Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Increase the Risk of Barret’s Esophagus?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. However, the impact of SG on Barrett’s esophagus (BE) remains unknown. The main objective was to determine the rate of BE 5 years after SG.

Materials and Methods

Patients, operated in 2012 by SG in one center, who preoperatively and postoperatively (5 years) underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), 24-h pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry, were included.

Results

A total of 59 (81.4% of females) patients were included. Preoperative mean age and body mass index were 45.2 ± 11.7 years and 45.2 ± 8.1 kg/m2 respectively. Preoperative 24-h pH monitoring reported gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 18 (30.5%) patients. The mean total body weight loss at 5 years was 16.1 ± 11.2%. No significant difference was observed between preoperative and postoperative de Meester’s score (20.2 ± 27.1 and 21.0 ± 21.5 respectively (p = 0.91)) nor between preoperative and postoperative number of acid reflux episodes per 24 h (65.1 ± < 40.0 and 50.3 ± 40.3 (p = 0.21)). The UGIE revealed 5 patients (8.5%) with endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia, without confirmed metaplasia on histologic examination. GERD was diagnosed in 32 patients (54.2%), de novo GERD in 16 (27.1%) patients and esophagitis in 16 (27.1%) patients. At 5 years, 25 patients (42.4%) reported a lack of regular medical follow-up.

Conclusions

This study highlights the incidence of postoperative GERD and endoscopic lesions following SG. Even though SG is not contraindicated in case of reflux, GERD patients who undergo SG may be supervised by a close endoscopic surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thereaux J, Lesuffleur T, Czernichow S, et al. Do sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass influence treatment with proton pump inhibitors 4 years after surgery? A nationwide cohort. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2017;13(6):951–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Himpens J, Ramos A, Welbourn R, Dixon J, Kinsman R, Walton P. IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. :84.

  3. Sebastianelli L, Benois M, Vanbiervliet G, Bailly L., Robert M., Turrin N., Gizard E., Foletto M., Bisello M., Albanese A., Santonicola A., Iovino P., Piche T., Angrisani L., Turchi L., Schiavo L., Iannelli A. Systematic endoscopy 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy results in a high rate of Barrett’s esophagus: results of a multicenter study. Obes Surg Published online January 21, 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03704-y, 1462, 1469

  4. Falk GW. Barrett’s esophagus: frequency and prediction of dysplasia and cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;29(1):125–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2015.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Musella M, Berardi G, Bocchetti A, et al. Esophagogastric neoplasms following bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review. Obes Surg. 2019;29(8):2660–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03951-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Communiqué no.3 : Surveillance endoscopique après sleeve gastrectomie et bypass en oméga définie par la SOFFCO.MM - SOFFCO.MM. Accessed June 2, 2019. https://soffcomm.org/communique-ndeg3-surveillance-endoscopique-apres-sleeve-gastrectomie-et-bypass-en-omega-definie-par

  7. Obésité : prise en charge chirurgicale chez l’adulte. Haute Autorité de Santé. Accessed July 22, 2019. https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_765529/fr/obesite-prise-en-charge-chirurgicale-chez-l-adulte

  8. Association AD. 1. Improving care and promoting health in populations: standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020;43(Suppl 1):S7-S13. doi:https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-S001

  9. Spechler SJ, Zeroogian JM, Antonioli DA, et al. Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction. Lancet Lond Engl. 1994;344(8936):1533–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90349-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pohl H, Pech O, Arash H, et al. Length of Barrett’s oesophagus and cancer risk: implications from a large sample of patients with early oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2016;65(2):196–201. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braghetto I, Csendes A. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in bariatric patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):710–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1574-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Felsenreich DM, Kefurt R, Schermann M, et al. Reflux, sleeve dilation, and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(12):3092–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2748-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishimura N, Amano Y, Uno G, et al. Endoscopic characteristics of short-segment Barrett’s esophagus, focusing on squamous islands and mucosal folds. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;27(Suppl 3):82–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07079.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meining A, Ott R, Becker I, et al. The Munich Barrett follow up study: suspicion of Barrett’s oesophagus based on either endoscopy or histology only--what is the clinical significance? Gut. 2004;53(10):1402–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2003.036822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Felsenreich DM, Langer FB, Prager G. Weight loss and resolution of comorbidities after sleeve gastrectomy: a review of long-term results. Scand J Surg SJS Off Organ Finn Surg Soc Scand Surg Soc. Published online September 6, 2018:1457496918798192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496918798192

  16. Wright FG, Duro A, Medici JR, et al. Esophageal adenocarcinoma five years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;32:47–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.01.054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheepers AF, Schoon EJ, Nienhuijs SW. Esophageal carcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2011;7(4):e11–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2010.09.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sohn S, Fischer J, Booth M. Adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction after sleeve gastrectomy: a case report. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87(10):E163–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Genco A, Soricelli E, Casella G, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a possible, underestimated long-term complication. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2017;13(4):568–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thereaux J, Barsamian C, Bretault M, et al. pH monitoring of gastro-oesophageal reflux before and after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2016;103(4):399–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10089.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Borbély Y, Schaffner E, Zimmermann L, et al. De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy: role of preoperative silent reflux. Surg Endosc Published online July 12, 2018, 789, 793 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6344-4

  22. Yeung KTD, Penney N, Ashrafian L, et al. Does sleeve gastrectomy expose the distal esophagus to severe reflux?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Published online March 20, 2019. 257, 265 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003275

  23. Rebecchi F, Allaix ME, Giaccone C, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a physiopathologic evaluation. Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):909–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sioka E, Tzovaras G, Perivoliotis K, et al. Impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on gastrointestinal motility. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018;2018:4135813–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4135813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Braghetto et al. Late esophagogastric anatomic and functional changes after sleeve gastrectomy and its clinical consequences with regards to gastroesophageal reflux... - PubMed - NCBI. Accessed August 6, 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31076757

  26. Braghetto I, Lanzarini E, Korn O, et al. Manometric changes of the lower esophageal sphincter after sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):357–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-0040-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Howard DD, Caban AM, Cendan JC, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2011;7(6):709–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. DuPree CE, Blair K, Steele SR, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease : a national analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(4):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. De Luca M, Angrisani L, Himpens J, et al. Indications for surgery for obesity and weight-related diseases: position statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1659–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2271-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Holmberg D, Santoni G, **e S, et al. Gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50(2):159–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nocca D, Skalli EM, Boulay E, et al. Nissen sleeve (N-sleeve) operation: preliminary results of a pilot study. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2016;12(10):1832–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Desart K, Rossidis G, Michel M, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux management with the LINX® system for gastroesophageal reflux disease following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2015;19(10):1782–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2887-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharara AI, Rustom LBO, Bou Daher H, et al. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux and risk factors for erosive esophagitis in obese patients considered for bariatric surgery Dig Liver Dis Off J Ital Soc Gastroenterol Ital Assoc Study Liver Published online May 7, 2019, 1375, 1379 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2019.04.010

  34. Emmanuelli J, Maymil V, Naves P. Rapport IGAS - situation de la chirurgie de l’obésité. Published online January 2018.

  35. Lyon A, Gibson SC, De-loyde K, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: hiatal findings and their management influence outcome. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2015;11(3):530–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019

  37. Spivak H, Rubin M, Sadot E, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie: the first-year outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1090–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1199-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang Y, Yi X-Y, Gong L-L, et al. The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with different sizes of bougie calibration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2018;49:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. McGlone ER, Gupta AK, Reddy M, et al. Antral resection versus antral preservation during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2018;14(6):857–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Nelly Renaud Moreau to the help for collecting data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Blanchard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was validated by the local Institutional Review Board (Groupe Nantais d’Éthique Dans la Santé) (RC17_0373). All patients signed an informed written consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lallemand, L., Duchalais, E., Musquer, N. et al. Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Increase the Risk of Barret’s Esophagus?. OBES SURG 31, 101–110 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04875-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04875-9

Keywords

Navigation