Log in

Postoperative Clinical-Endoscopic Follow-up for GERD and Gastritis After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: How, When, and Why

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a widely diffused surgical procedure for morbid obesity. Several studies considered OAGB at risk for biliary reflux and anastomotic ulcers. The aim of the study was to evaluate gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophagitis/gastritis rate after OAGB diagnosed by upper endoscopy (UE), comparing the results with GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) score.

Methods

From July 2014 to February 2019, patients underwent OAGB with at least 12-month follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical evaluation was associated with GERD-HRQL scoring. UE with a mucosal biopsy was also performed. A comparison among clinical scores and endoscopic findings was performed.

Results

Two hundred forty-one patients were analyzed in the study. Anthropometric features (BMI, %Excess weight loss, %Total weight loss) were significantly improved. Only 30% of patients with GERD-HQRL>30 showed esophagitis at UE: 11/181 (6.1%) showed grade A erosive esophagitis, 2/181 (1.1%) grade B esophagitis, whereas no patient resulted in grade C/D. Fifty-two patients (28.7%) showed endoscopic remnant gastritis of at least grade 1, with histological gastritis of at least mild grade in 70/181 patients (38.7%).

Conclusion

OAGB is a feasible and effective procedure in terms of weight reduction and comorbidities control, but controversies remain about the long-term onset of GERD and bile reflux. The incidence of esophagitis was increased after OAGB. However, the severity and incidence were lower compared to sleeve gastrectomy. Conversely, the incidence of gastritis, ileo-gastric anastomotic inflammation, and HP positivity were not negligible, suggesting the potential benefits of endoscopic surveillance after OAGB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher BL, Buchwald H, Clark W, et al. Mini-gastric bypass controversy. Obes Surg. 2001;11(6):773–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, et al. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2956–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruzzi M, Duboc H, Gronnier C, et al. Long-term evaluation of biliary reflux after experimental one-anastomosis gastric bypass in rats. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):1119–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahawar KK, Borg CM, Kular KS, et al. Understanding objections to one anastomosis (mini) gastricbypass: a survey of 417 surgeons not performing this procedure. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2222–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramos AC, Chevallier JM, Mahawar K, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) consensus conference statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balla A, Quaresima S, Palmieri L, et al. Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on quality of life related to gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29(12):1532–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kulich KR, Madisch A, Pacini F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:12. Published 2008 Jan 31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology. 1996;111(1):85–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(3):1084–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abe H, Murakami K, Satoh S, et al. Influence of bile reflux and Helicobacter pylori infection on gastritis in the remnant gastric mucosa after distal gastrectomy. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(6):563–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stolte M, Meining A. The updated Sydney system: classification and grading of gastritis as the basis of diagnosis and treatment. Can J Gastroenterol. 2001;15(9):591–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gero D, Raptis DA, Vleeschouwers W, et al. Defining global benchmarks in bariatric surgery: a retrospective multicenter analysis of minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270(5):859–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saarinen T, Rasanen J, Salo J, et al. Bile reflux scintigraphy after mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2083–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eldredge TA, Myers JC, Kiroff GK, et al. Detecting bile reflux-the enigma of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):559–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keleidari B, Mahmoudieh M, Davarpanah Jazi AH, et al. Comparison of the bile reflux frequency in one anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1721–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Del Genio G, Tolone S, Gambardella C, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and anterior fundoplication (D-SLEEVE) prevents gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1642–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raj PP, Bhattacharya S, Misra S, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux-related physiologic changes after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective comparative study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(8):1261–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oor JE, Roks DJ, Unlü Ç, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):250–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carbajo M, García-Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee WJ, Almalki OM, Ser KH, et al. Randomized controlled trial of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity: comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan studies. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):3047–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial [published correction appears in Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1298]. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li HH, Zhang QZ, Xu L, et al. Clinical outcome of esophageal cancer after distal gastrectomy: a prospective study. Int J Surg. 2008 Apr;6(2):129–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hashimoto N, Inayama M, Fujishima M, et al. Esophageal cancer after distal gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(5):346–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tolone S, Musella M, Savarino E, et al. Esophagogastric junction function and gastric pressure profile after minigastric bypass compared with Billroth II. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(4):567–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gong Y, Zeng Q, Yan Y, et al. Association between lifestyle and gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire scores: a cross-sectional study of 37 442 Chinese adults. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019;2019:5753813.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Francesco Pizza: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing original draft preparation. Dario D’antonio: visualization, investigation. Salvatore Tolone: supervision. Francesco Saverio Lucido: software, validation. Chiara Dell’Isola and Cludio Gambardella: reviewing, editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Pizza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pizza, F., D’Antonio, D., Lucido, F.S. et al. Postoperative Clinical-Endoscopic Follow-up for GERD and Gastritis After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: How, When, and Why. OBES SURG 30, 4391–4400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04805-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04805-9

Keywords

Navigation