Log in

Polarization Resistance Measurement in Tap Water: The Influence of Rust Electrochemical Activity

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corrosion rate of mild steel in tap water during 4300 h was estimated by LPR and weight-loss methods coupled with OCP measurements. The LPR results were found to be overestimated compared to the weight-loss data within initial 2000 h of exposure. The electrochemical activity of the rust separated from the metal surface was studied by cycling voltammetry using a home-built powder graphite electrode. High redox currents corresponding to the initial 2000 h of exposure were detected. Rust composition was characterized with IR and XRD, and the highest amounts of electrochemically active β- and γ-FeOOH were again detected for the initial 2000 h. Current consumption in rust transformation processes during LPR measurement in the galvanostatic mode accounts for overestimation of the corrosion rate. The time dependence of rust electrochemical activity correlates with OCP variation with time. During initial 2000 h, OCP values are shifted by 50 mV to cathodic side. For the period of a higher rust electrochemical activity, the use of a reduced B is suggested to increase accuracy of LPR technique in tap water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. McCafferty, Introduction to Corrosion Science, Springer, Berlin, 2010

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. A.J. Bard and L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.M. Angst and B. Elsener, Measuring Corrosion Rates: A Novel AC Method Based on Processing and Analysing Signals Recorded in the Time Domain, Corros. Sci., 2014, 89, p 307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Stern and A.L. Geary, Electrochemical Polarization, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1957, 104, p 559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Da Silva, L. De Faria, and J.F. Boodts, Determination of the Morphology Factor of Oxide Layers, Electrochim. Acta, 2001, 47, p 395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y.S. Herasymenko and H.S. Vasyl’ev, A Two-Step Method for the Evaluation of Corrosion Rate in Metals, Mater. Sci., 2009, 45, p 899–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Bousselmi, C. Fiaud, B. Tribollet, and E. Triki, Impedance Spectroscopic Study of a Steel Electrode in Condition of Scaling and Corrosion: Interphase Model, Electrochim. Acta, 1999, 44, p 4357–4363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.A. González, J.M. Miranda, E. Otero, and S. Feliu, Effect of Electrochemically Reactive Rust Layers on the Corrosion of Steel in a Ca(OH)2 Solution, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 436–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Bensabra and N. Azzouz, Study of Rust Effect on the Corrosion Behavior of Reinforcement Steel Using Impedance Spectroscopy, Metall. Mater. Trans., 2013, 44, p 5703–5710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Yan, C. Sun, J. Xu, J. Dong, and W. Ke, Role of Fe oxides in corrosion of pipeline steel in a red clay soil, Corros. Sci., 2014, 80, p 309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Feliu, J.A. González, and S. Feliu, Corrosion Estimates from the Transient Response to a Potential Step, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 3241–3255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. Lair, H. Antony, L. Legrand, and A. Chausse, Electrochemical Reduction of Ferric Corrosion Products and Evaluation of Galvanic Coupling with Iron, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48, p 2050–2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Q. Shou, J. Cheng, L. Zhang, B.J. Nelson, and X. Zhang, Synthesis and Characterization of a Nanocomposite of Goethite Nanorods and Reduced Graphene Oxide for Electrochemical Capacitors, J. Solid State Chem., 2012, 185, p 191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. X. Lou, X. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Goethite Nanorods as Anode Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Li-ion Batteries, Electrochem. Commun., 2009, 11, p 1696–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Zou, J. Wang, and Y.Y. Zheng, Electrochemical Techniques for Determining Corrosion Rate of Rusted Steel in Seawater, Corros. Sci., 2011, 53, p 208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Wu, D. Bai, A.P. Baker, Z. Li, and X. Liu, Electrochemical Techniques Correlation Study of On-line Corrosion Monitoring Probes, Mater. Corros., 2015, 66, p 143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Vasyliev, A. Brovchenko, and Y. Herasymenko, Comparative Assessment of Corrosion Behaviour of Mild Steels 3, 20 and 08KP in Tap Water, Chem. Chem. Technol., 2013, 7, p 477–482

    Google Scholar 

  18. L.R. Hilbert, Monitoring Corrosion Rates and Localised Corrosion in Low Conductivity Water, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48, p 3907–3923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. Richter, L.R. Hilbert, and R.I. Thorarinsdottir, On-line Corrosion Monitoring in Geothermal District Heating Systems. I. General Corrosion Rates, Corros. Sci., 2006, 48, p 1770–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Richter, R.I. Thorarinsdottir, and F. Jonsdottir, On-line Corrosion Monitoring in Geothermal District Heating Systems. II. Localized Corrosion, Corros. Sci., 2007, 49, p 1907–1917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Filanovsky, Y.I. Tur, I. Kuselman, T. Burenko, and A. Shenhar, Solid Electrodes from Refractory Powder Materials Prepared for Electroanalytical Purposes by a Novel Method, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 364, p 181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Choudhary, A. Garg, and K. Mondal, Relation Between Open Circuit Potential and Polarization Resistance with Rust and Corrosion Monitoring of Mild Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 2969–2976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Liu, P. Li, M. Zhu, Y. Wei, and Y. Sun, Fe (II)-Induced Transformation from Ferrihydrite to Lepidocrocite and Goethite, J. Solid State Chem., 2007, 180, p 2121–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Antony, L. Legrand, L. Maréchal, S. Perrin, P. Dillmann, and A. Chaussé, Study of Lepidocrocite γ-FeOOH Electrochemical Reduction in Neutral and Slightly Alkaline Solutions at 25 C, Electrochim. Acta, 2005, 51, p 745–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Tamura, The Role of Rusts in Corrosion and Corrosion Protection of Iron and Steel, Corros. Sci., 2008, 50, p 1872–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G.S. Vasyliev, The Influence of Flow Rate on Corrosion of Mild Steel in Hot Tap Water, Corros. Sci., 2015, 98, p 33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G.S. Vasyliev, Y.S. Gerasimenko, S.K. Poznyak, and L.S. Tsybulskaya, A Study of the Anticorrosion Properties of Carbonate Deposits to Protect Low-Carbon Steel from the Action of Tap Water, Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2014, 87, p 450–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Lin, M. Ellaway, and R. Adrien, Study of Corrosion Material Accumulated on the Inner Wall of Steel Water Pipe, Corros. Sci., 2001, 43, p 2065–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. V.P. Chviruk, O.V. Linuycheva, and E.M. Zaverach, Galvanic-Type Electrochemical Sensor for Determining the Content of Hydrohalogens in the Air, Sens. Actuators B Chem., 2003, 92, p 60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Prof. Y. Gerasymenko (National technical university of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”) for helpful discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgii Vasyliev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vasyliev, G. Polarization Resistance Measurement in Tap Water: The Influence of Rust Electrochemical Activity. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 26, 3939–3945 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2813-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-017-2813-5

Keywords

Navigation