Abstract
A study on the flexural properties of E glass and TR50S carbon fiber reinforced hybrid composites is presented in this paper. Specimens were made by the hand lay-up process in an intra-ply configuration with varying degrees of glass fibers added to the surface of a carbon laminate. These specimens were then tested in the three-point bend configuration in accordance with ASTM D790-07 at three span-to-depth ratios: 16, 32, and 64. The failure modes were examined under an optical microscope. The flexural behavior was also simulated by finite element analysis, and the flexural modulus, flexural strength, and strain to failure were calculated. It is shown that although span-to-depth ratio shows an influence on the stress-strain relationship, it has no effect on the failure mode. The majority of specimens failed by either in-plane or out-of-plane local buckling followed by kinking and splitting at the compressive GFRP side and matrix cracking combined with fiber breakage at the CFRP tensile face. It is shown that positive hybrid effects exist for the flexural strengths of most of the hybrid configurations. The hybrid effect is noted to be more obvious when the hybrid ratio is small, which may be attributed to the relative position of the GFRP layer(s) with respect to the neutral plane. In contrast to this, flexural modulus seems to obey the rule of mixtures equation.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig8_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig9_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig10_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig11_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig12_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig13_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11665-012-0247-7/MediaObjects/11665_2012_247_Fig14_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Oya and H. Hamada, Effect of Reinforcing Fibre Properties on Various Mechanical Behaviour of Unidirectional Carbon/Epoxy Laminates, Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater., 1996, 5(3–4), p 105–129
N. Oya and D.J. Johnson, Longitudinal Compressive Behaviour and Microstructure of PAN-Based Carbon Fibres, Carbon, 2001, 39(5), p 635–645
M. Shioya and M. Nakatani, Compressive Strengths of Single Carbon Fibres and Composite Strands, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2000, 60(2), p 219–229
Sudarisman and I.J. Davies, Flexural Failure of Unidirectional Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites Containing Different Grades of Glass Fibre, Adv. Mater. Res., 2008, 41–42, p 357–362
Sudarisman and I.J. Davies, Influence of Compressive Pressure, Vacuum Pressure, and Holding Temperature Applied During Autoclave Curing on the Microstructure of Unidirectional CFRP Composites, Adv. Mater. Res., 2008, 41–42, p 323–328
G. Belingardi, M.P. Cavatorta, and C. Frasca, Bending Fatigue Behavior of Glass-Carbon/Epoxy Hybrid Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2006, 66(2), p 222–232
S. Fischer and G. Marom, The Flexural Behaviour of Aramid Fibre Hybrid Composite Materials, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1987, 28(4), p 291–314
Y. Li, X.J. **an, C.L. Choy, M.L. Guo, and Z.G. Zhang, Compressive and Flexural Behavior of Ultra-High-Modulus Polyethylene Fiber and Carbon Fiber Hybrid Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1999, 59(1), p 13–18
I.R. McColl and J.G. Morley, Crack Growth in Hybrid Fibrous Composites, J. Mater. Sci., 1977, 12(6), p 1165–1175
Sudarisman, I.J. Davies, and H. Hamada, Compressive Failure of Unidirectional Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Epoxy Composites Containing Carbon and Silicon Carbide Fibres, Compos. A, 2007, 38(3), p 1070–1074
M.M. Thwe and K. Liao, Durability of Bamboo-Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Hybrid Composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2003, 63(3–4), p 375–387
G. Kretsis, A Review on the Tensile, Compressive, Flexural and Shear Properties of Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Plastics, Composites, 1987, 18(1), p 13–23
Sudarisman and I.J. Davies, The Effects of Processing Parameters on the Flexural Properties of Unidirectional Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Composites, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2008, 498(1–2), p 65–68
C. Dong, H.A. Ranaweera-Jayawardena, and I.J. Davies, Flexural Properties of Hybrid Composites Reinforced by S-2 Glass and T700S Carbon Fibres, Compos. B Eng., 2012, 43(2), p 573–581
S.-F. Hwang and C.-P. Mao, Failure of Delaminated Interply Hybrid Composite Plates Under Compression, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2001, 61(11), p 1513–1527
ASTM International, Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials (2007)
S. Deng, L. Ye, and Y. Mai, Influence of Fibre Cross-Sectional Aspect Ratio in Mechanical Properties of Glass-Fibre/Epoxy Composites II. Interlaminar Fracture and Impact Behaviour, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1999, 59(11), p 1725–1734
T.-W. Chou, Microstructural Design of Fiber Composites, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992
C.S. Dong, Modeling the Dimensional Variations of Composites Using Effective Coefficients of Thermal Expansion, J. Compos. Mater., 2009, 43(22), p 2639–2652
C.S. Dong, Modeling the Process-Induced Dimensional Variations of General Curved Composite Components and Assemblies, Compos. A, 2009, 40(8), p 1210–1216
C. Dong, H.A. Ranaweera-Jayawardena, and I.J. Davies, Flexural Properties of Hybrid Composites Reinforced by S-2 Glass and T700S Carbon Fibres, Composites B, 2012, 43(2), p 573–581
K.H. Lo and E.S.M. Chim, Compressive Strength of Unidirectional Composites, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 1992, 11(8), p 838–896
R.E. Bullock, Strength Ratios of Composite Materials in Flexure and in Tension, J. Compos. Mater., 1974, 8, p 200–206
M.R. Piggott and B. Harris, Compression Strength of Hybrid Fibre-Reinforced Plastics, J. Mater. Sci., 1981, 16(3), p 687–693
I.M. Daniel, H.M. Hsiao, and S.C. Wooh, Failure Mechanism of Thick Composites Under Compressive Loading, Compos. B, 1996, 27(6), p 543–552
I.J. Davies and H. Hamada, Flexural Properties of a Hybrid Polymer Matrix Composite Containing Carbon and Silicon Carbide Fibres, Adv. Compos. Mater., 2001, 10(1), p 77–96
S.H. Lee and A.M. Waas, Compressive Response and Failure of Fibre Reinforced Unidirectional Composites, Int. J. Fract., 1999, 100(3), p 275–306
Acknowledgments
Chensong Dong thanks the support from the Curtin Research Fellowship. The authors thank Mr Bradley de San Miguel for carrying out the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, C., Sudarisman & Davies, I.J. Flexural Properties of E Glass and TR50S Carbon Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Hybrid Composites. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 22, 41–49 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-012-0247-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-012-0247-7