Log in

Use of an Education Specialist Team that Collaborates with Faculty Members to Efficiently and Continuously Develop an Innovative Pharmacy Curriculum Across Multiple Campuses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a unique organizational approach involving education specialists and faculty members in the continuous development of a Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. The described curriculum includes extensive use of technology with blended learning and use of interactive videoconferencing to three campuses. This curriculum is competency-based, integrated with teaching by faculty members from multiple disciplines and includes spiraling to promote deep learning. Student-centered personal and professional development facilitates achievement of soft-skills. The education specialists involved in curriculum development include instructional designers, experienced educators who provide daily course management and assist in the classroom, and an assessment specialist. The premise of this model is that the education specialist team provides expertise that will promote curricular efficacy and excellence, and by assuming instructional tasks that do not require content expertise they allow faculty members to more efficiently accomplish teaching responsibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, D. E. (2002). Where will we be tomorrow? We need a 2020 vision. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 66, 208–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, D. G., & Ferguson, K. J. (2015). The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide no. 96. Medical Teacher, 37, 312–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., & Steinert, Y. (2016). Amending Miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation. Academic Medicine, 91, 180–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englander, R., Frank, J. R., Carraccio, C., et al. (2017). Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education. Medical Teacher, 39, 582–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. M. (2007). Assessment in medical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M., & Levie, W. H. (Eds.). (1993). Instructional message design: Principles form the behavioral and cognitive sciences (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, B. L., Peeters, M. J., Resman-Targoff, B. H., Karr, S., McBane, S., Kelley, K., Thomas, T., & Denetclaw, T. H. (2011). An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 75(9), 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, E., & Schroth, W. S. (2012). Deconstructing integration: A framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy. Academic Medicine, 87, 729–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruppen, L. D., Mangrulkar, R. S., & Kolars, J. C. (2012). The promise of competency-based education in the health-professions for improving global health. Human Resources for Health, 10, 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M. (2000). The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Medical Education, 34, 551–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harden, R. M., Sowden, S., & Dunn, W. R. (1984). Some educational strategies in curriculum development: The SPICES model. ASME medical education booklet number 18. Medical Education, 18, 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. C., Congdon, H. B., & DiPiro, J. T. (2010). The status of US multi-campus colleges and schools of pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 74(7) Article 124.

  • Hofman, J. (2006). Why blended learning hasn’t (yet) fulfilled its promises. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikemoto, G. S., Steele, J. L., & Pane, J. F. (2016). Poor implementation of learner-centered practices: A cautionary tale. Teachers College Record., 118, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, D. E., Thomas, P. A., & Hughes, M. T. (Eds.). (2009). Curriculum development for medical education (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic603902.files/KoedingerCorbett05.pdf

  • Kyllonen, P. C. (2013). Soft skills for the workplace. Change, 45, 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, M. S., Plaza, C. M., Stowe, C. D., et al. (2013). Center for the advancement of pharmacy education 2013 educational outcomes. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 77(8), 162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. E. (1990). The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Academic Medicine, 65, 563–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. (2010). Improving and enhancing performance in the affective domain of nursing students: Insights from the literature for clinical educators. Contemporary Nurse, 35, 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofstad, W., & Brunner, L. J. (2013). Team-based learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 77(4), 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68, 749–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmlee, D., Michaelsen, L. K., Cook, S., & Hudes, P. D. (2012). Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Medical Teacher, 34, e275–e287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, K. (2015). The future of learning design: “The future’s so bright I gotta wear shades”. TechTrends, 59, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ried, L. D., & McKenzie, M. (2004). A preliminary report on the academic performance of students in a distance education program. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 68(3), 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. W., Brown, S. D., Clavier, C. W., & Wyatt, J. (2011). Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 75(4), 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Team-Based Learning Collaborative. (2017). What is TBL? Retrieved from http://www.teambasedlearning.org/definition/

  • Ten Cate, T. J., & De Haes, J. C. (2000). Summative assessment of medical students in the affective domain. Medical Teacher, 22, 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UF College of Pharmacy. (2017). The Pharm.D. Curriculum. Retrieved from: http://curriculum.pharmacy.ufl.edu/curriculum-courses/

  • Wilkerson, L., Stevens, C. M., & Krasne, S. (2009). No content without context: Integrating basic, clinical, and social sciences in a pre-clerkship curriculum. Medical Teacher, 31, 812–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shane M. Ryan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

Shane M. Ryan, M.Ed. declares that he has no conflict of interest. Diane E. Beck, Pharm.D. declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryan, S.M., Beck, D.E. Use of an Education Specialist Team that Collaborates with Faculty Members to Efficiently and Continuously Develop an Innovative Pharmacy Curriculum Across Multiple Campuses. TechTrends 62, 230–238 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0274-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0274-9

Keywords

Navigation