Abstract
Culturally responsive teaching and design practices flip the online classroom by creating an environment that acknowledges, celebrates, and builds upon the cultural capital that learners and teachers bring to the online classroom. Challenges exist in all phases of online course design, including the ability to create online courses that reflect the instructor’s commitment to inclusive excellence, diversity, and social justice. Designing an online environment that supports all learners regardless of their backgrounds is important in their future success as professionals; thus, it is important for faculty to design courses with all students in mind. The purpose of this article is to share best practices in the design of culturally and linguistically responsive online courses that support the culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students we serve. Based on Gay’s (2010) culturally responsive teaching practices, this article provides examples of online activities that are validating; comprehensive; multi-dimensional; empowering; transformative, and emancipatory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boettcher, J. V., & Conrad, R. M. (2010). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge.
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felter, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.
Brookfield, S., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brubaker, N. D. (2012). Negotiating authority through jointly constructing the course curriculum. Teachers and Teaching, 18(2), 159–180.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Conrad, R. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Conrad, R. M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2012). Continuing to engage the online learner: More activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cooper, L. (1999). Anatomy of an online course. THE Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 26(7), 49.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Hammerness, K. (2002). Toward a pedagogy of cases in teacher education. Teaching Education, 13(2), 125–135.
Douglas, K., & Johnson, B. (2010). Legal education and E-Learning: Online fishbowl role-play as a learning and teaching strategy in legal skills development. eLaw Journal, 17(1), 28–46.
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.) (Multicultural education series). New York: Teachers College.
Heitner, K. L., & Jennings, M. (2016). Culturally responsive teaching knowledge and practices of online faculty. Online Learning, 20(4), 54–78.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Lee, C. D. (2003). Toward a framework for culturally responsive design in multimedia computer environments: Cultural modeling as a case. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10(1), 42–61.
Lehman, R. M., & Conceição, S. C. (2010). Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: How to” be there” for distance learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lin, Y. T., Wen, M. L., Jou, M., & Wu, D. W. (2014). A cloud-based learning environment for develo** student reflection abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 244–252.
Macedo, D. P. (2006). Literacies of power: What Americans are not allowed to know. Boulder: Westview Press.
Martins-Shannon, J., & White, M. (2012). Support Culturally Responsive Teaching! Kappa Delta Pi Record, 48(1), 4–6. doi:10.1080/00228958.2012.654718.
McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating Dynamic Learning Communities in Synchronous Online Courses: One Approach from the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL). Online Learning Journal, 20(1), 1–20.
Mehlenbacher, B. (2010). Instruction and technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2012). Temporal Distance and Discrimination An Audit Study in Academia. Psychological Science, 23(7), 710–717.
Morong, G., & DesBiens, D. (2016). Culturally responsive online design: learning at intercultural intersections. Intercultural Education, 27(5), 474–492.
New Mexico State University. (2016). Fall 2015 Fact Book. https://education.nmsu.edu/news/quick-facts/.
Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2010). Collaborating online: Learning together in community (Vol. 32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peters, M., & Roberts, P. (2012). The virtues of openness: Education, science, and scholarship in the digital age. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., Kuznetsov, A., & Noroozi, O. (2012). Multicultural student group work in higher education: An explorative case study on challenges as perceived by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(2), 302–317.
Sautter, P. (2007). Designing discussion activities to achieve desired learning outcomes: Choices using mode of delivery and structure. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 122–131.
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Hennigsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing standard-based mathematics instruction: A case for professional development. New York: Teachers College.
Vai, M., & Sosulski, K. (2015). Essentials of online course design: A standards-based guide. New York: Routledge.
Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race ethnicity and education, 8(1), 69–91.
Acknowledgements
As social justice educators, we are concerned with the continued reinforcement of elitist notions of privilege in higher education including in the value placed on authorship order as it regards journal articles. Thus, we want to acknowledge that the authorship of this manuscript is credited equally to all four authors. Each contributed toward its visioning, construction, writing, and editing. Regardless of where names fall on the authorship list, we are all “first” author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dr. X. Woodley declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. C. Hernandez declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. J. Parra is an advisory council member for the National Geographic Network of Alliances and is a member of the board of directors for Online Learning Consortium. Mr. B. Negash declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woodley, X., Hernandez, C., Parra, J. et al. Celebrating Difference: Best Practices in Culturally Responsive Teaching Online. TechTrends 61, 470–478 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0207-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0207-z