Log in

A Faculty Development Program for Nurse Educators Learning to Teach Online

  • The Instructional Design Portfolio
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the College of Nursing at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville prepared to move their graduate programs online, a nursing faculty grass-roots movement led to the implementation of a faculty development program. This instructional design portfolio describes the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of this program, with the goal of identifying best practices in the design of programs for learning to teach online.

These include understanding the importance of just-in-time learning, develo** the ability to meet diverse needs, defining workshop expectations and workload requirements, increased integration of technology and pedagogy training, and the importance of modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Caffarella, R. S. & Zinn, L. F. (1999). Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative Higher Education, 23(4), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, K. & Kalk, D. (2005). Real world instructional design. Toronto, Canada: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.) Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, L. (2003). Removing barriers to professional development. Technology Horizons in Education (T.H.E.) Journal 30(11). Available online at: http://thejournal.com/Articles/2003/06/01/Removing-Barriers-to-Professional-Development.aspx

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a community of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higdon, J. & Topaz, C. (2009). Blogs and wikis as instructional tools: A social software adaptation of just-in-time teaching. College Teaching 57(2), 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Garvin, A. D., & Christianson, W. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with Web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, M., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, P. D., Shea, T. P., & Kristensen, E. (2003). Online communities of practice: A catalyst for faculty development. Innovative Higher Education 27(3), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolen, D. (1996). Constraints that nursing program administrators encounter in promoting faculty change and development. Journal of Professional Nursing 12(2), 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Map** a route toward a differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

By Debra Lee, Trena M. Paulus, Iryna Loboda, Gina Phipps, Tami H. Wyatt, Carole R. Myers, Sandra J. Mixer. A Faculty Development Program for Nurse Educators Learning to Teach Online. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 54, 20–28 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-010-0450-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-010-0450-z

Keywords

Navigation