Log in

New design chart for geotechnical ground improvement: characterizing cement-stabilized sand

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cement stabilization of soil is a useful method to improve the mechanical behaviors and engineering performance of soils in geotechnical design and construction projects involving weak or liquefiable soils. Among the factors affecting the strength of cement-stabilized soils, water content and water–cement ratio are important but less well understood because of controversial views. This paper presents a systematic laboratory study to investigate the effects of water content and water–cement ratio on the unconfined compressive strength, with good control of the packing density and void ratio of the tested specimens. The effects of void ratio and cement content are also investigated. The strength of the cement-stabilized sand continuously decreased with increasing water–cement ratio within the range of 0.5 to about 3. A general equation is suggested to evaluate the unconfined compressive strength of cement-stabilized soil. Finally, a new conceptual characterization chart is proposed with consideration of the effects of cement content, water content, and water–cement ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Fitting parameter

cc :

Cement content

C iv :

Volumetric cement content

e :

Void ratio

fi (X):

Function of parameter/variable X

G s,material :

Specific gravity of the material

k, l, m :

Fitting parameter

mcement, msand :

Mass of cement and sand, respectively

MIP:

Mercury intrusion porosimetry

n :

Porosity

n/Civ :

Porosity/cement ratio

n1, n2, n3 :

Fitting parameter

OPC:

Ordinary Portland cement

Q, Q0, q0 :

Fitting parameter

q uc :

Unconfined compressive strength

q uc, normalized :

Normalized unconfined compressive strength

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

UCS:

Unconfined compressive strength

USCS:

Unified soil classification system

Vcement, Vsand, Vsolid, Vvoid :

Volume of cement, sand, solids, and voids

V total :

Total volume of the specimen

w/c :

Water–cement ratio

w soil :

Water content of soil

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

References

  1. ASTM (2013) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil: ASTMD2166/D2166M. ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cardoso R (2016) Porosity and tortuosity influence on geophysical properties of an artificially cemented sand. Eng Geol 211:198–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardoso R, Ribeiro D, Néri R (2017) Bonding effect on the evolution with curing time of compressive and tensile strength of sand–cement mixtures. Soils Found 57(4):655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chian SC, Nguyen ST, Phoon KK (2016) Extended strength development model of cement-treated clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(2):06015014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough G, Iwabuchi J, Rad N, Kuppusamy T (1989) Influence of cementation on liquefaction of sands. J Geotech Eng 115(8):1102–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, Heineck KS (2007) Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(2):197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Consoli NC, Dalla Rosa F, Fonini A (2009) Plate load tests on cemented soil layers overlaying weaker soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):1846–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dupas J, Pecker A (1979) Static and dynamic properties of sand–cement. J Geotech Eng Div 105(3):419–436

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ho LS, Nakarai K, Duc M, Le Kouby A, Maachi A, Sasaki T (2018) Analysis of strength development in cement-treated soils under different curing conditions through microstructural and chemical investigations. Constr Build Mater 166:634–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horpibulsuk S, Miura N, Nagaraj TS (2003) Assessment of strength development in cement-admixed high water content clays with Abrams’ law as a basis. Géotechnique 53(4):439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaniraj SR, Havanagi VG (1999) Compressive strength of cement stabilized fly ash-soil mixtures. Cement Concrete Res 29(5):673–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee F-H, Lee Y, Chew S-H, Yong K-Y (2005) Strength and modulus of marine clay-cement mixes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(2):178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H-L, Deng A, Chu J (2006) Effect of different mixing ratios of polystyrene pre-puff beads and cement on the mechanical behaviour of lightweight fill. Geotext Geomembr 24(6):331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, He LQ, Jiang YJ, Sun MM, Chen EJ, Lee F-H (2018) Effect of in situ water content variation on the spatial variation of strength of deep cement-mixed clay. Géotechnique (in press)

  15. Lorenzo GA, Bergado DT (2004) Fundamental parameters of cement-admixed clay—new approach. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(10):1042–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pamuk A, Gallagher PM, Zimmie TF (2007) Remediation of piled foundations against lateral spreading by passive site stabilization technique. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(9):864–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park S-S (2010) Effect of wetting on unconfined compressive strength of cemented sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1713–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rattley MJ, Lehane BM, Consoli NC, Richards DJ (2008) Uplift of shallow foundations with cement-stabilised backfill. Proc Inst Civil Eng Ground Improv 161(2):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rios S, Da Fonseca A, Baudet BA (2014) On the shearing behaviour of an artificially cemented soil. Acta Geotech 9(2):215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stracke F, Jung JG, Korf EP, Consoli NC (2012) The influence of moisture content on tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. Soils Rocks 35(3):303–308

    Google Scholar 

  21. Subramanian S, Moon S-W, Moon J, Ku T (2018) CSA-treated sand for geotechnical application: microstructure analysis and rapid strength development. J Mater Civil Eng 30(12):4018313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Towhata I (2007) Developments of soil improvement technologies for mitigation of liquefaction risk. In: Earthquake geotechnical engineering: proceedings of 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering-invited lectures. Springer, Berlin, pp 355–383

  23. Vinoth G, Moon S-W, Moon J, Ku T (2018) Early strength development in cement-treated sand using low-carbon rapid-hardening cements. Soils Found 58(5):1200–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. **ao H, Lee FH, Chin KG (2014) Yielding of cement-treated marine clay. Soils Found 54(3):488–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE), Award No. R-302-000-194-114.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taeseo Ku.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

According to the definition given by Consoli et al. [6], it is straightforward to have the following equation:

$${n \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {n {C_{\text{vi}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {C_{\text{vi}} }} = \frac{{{{V_{\text{void}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{V_{\text{void}} } {V_{\text{total}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {V_{\text{total}} }}}}{{{{V_{\text{cement}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{V_{\text{cement}} } {V_{\text{total}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {V_{\text{total}} }}}} = \frac{{V_{\text{void}} }}{{V_{\text{cement}} }}$$
(9)

where Vvoid, Vcement, and Vtotal are the volume of voids, the volume of cement, and the total volume of the sample, respectively. The following equation can be obtained by modifying Eq. 9.

$${n \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {n {C_{\text{vi}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {C_{\text{vi}} }} = \frac{{V_{\text{void}} }}{{V_{\text{solid}} }} \cdot \frac{{V_{\text{solid}} }}{{V_{\text{cement}} }} = e \cdot \left( {\frac{{V_{\text{solid}} }}{{V_{\text{cement}} }}} \right)$$
(10)

where Vsolid is the volume of solids (sand particles and cement particles). Noting that Vsolid = Vcement + Vsand, where Vsand is the volume of sand particles, Eq. 10 can be further derived as follows:

$${n \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {n {C_{\text{vi}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {C_{\text{vi}} }} = e \cdot \left( {\frac{{V_{\text{sand}} + V_{\text{cement}} }}{{V_{\text{cement}} }}} \right) = e \cdot \left( {\frac{{{{m_{\text{sand}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{m_{\text{sand}} } {G_{\text{s,sand}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {G_{\text{s,sand}} }} + {{m_{\text{cement}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{m_{\text{cement}} } {G_{\text{s,cement}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {G_{\text{s,cement}} }}}}{{{{m_{\text{cement}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{m_{\text{cement}} } {G_{\text{s,cement}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {G_{\text{s,cement}} }}}}} \right)$$
(11)

where mcement and msand are the mass of cement and sand, respectively. Then, Eq. 6 (also Eq. 12) can be finally derived by substituting mcement = cc·msand as follows:

$${n \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {n {C_{\text{vi}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {C_{\text{vi}} }} = e \cdot \left( {\frac{{G_{\text{s,cement}} + {cc} \cdot G_{\text{s,sand}} }}{{{cc} \cdot G_{\text{s,sand}} }}} \right) = e \cdot \left( {1 + \frac{{G_{\text{s,cement}} }}{{{cc} \cdot G_{\text{s,sand}} }}} \right)$$
(12)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, X., Ku, T. New design chart for geotechnical ground improvement: characterizing cement-stabilized sand. Acta Geotech. 15, 999–1011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00838-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00838-2

Keywords

Navigation