Abstract
Cement stabilization of soil is a useful method to improve the mechanical behaviors and engineering performance of soils in geotechnical design and construction projects involving weak or liquefiable soils. Among the factors affecting the strength of cement-stabilized soils, water content and water–cement ratio are important but less well understood because of controversial views. This paper presents a systematic laboratory study to investigate the effects of water content and water–cement ratio on the unconfined compressive strength, with good control of the packing density and void ratio of the tested specimens. The effects of void ratio and cement content are also investigated. The strength of the cement-stabilized sand continuously decreased with increasing water–cement ratio within the range of 0.5 to about 3. A general equation is suggested to evaluate the unconfined compressive strength of cement-stabilized soil. Finally, a new conceptual characterization chart is proposed with consideration of the effects of cement content, water content, and water–cement ratio.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11440-019-00838-2/MediaObjects/11440_2019_838_Fig12_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Fitting parameter
- cc :
-
Cement content
- C iv :
-
Volumetric cement content
- e :
-
Void ratio
- fi (X):
-
Function of parameter/variable X
- G s,material :
-
Specific gravity of the material
- k, l, m :
-
Fitting parameter
- mcement, msand :
-
Mass of cement and sand, respectively
- MIP:
-
Mercury intrusion porosimetry
- n :
-
Porosity
- n/Civ :
-
Porosity/cement ratio
- n1, n2, n3 :
-
Fitting parameter
- OPC:
-
Ordinary Portland cement
- Q, Q0, q0 :
-
Fitting parameter
- q uc :
-
Unconfined compressive strength
- q uc, normalized :
-
Normalized unconfined compressive strength
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
- UCS:
-
Unconfined compressive strength
- USCS:
-
Unified soil classification system
- Vcement, Vsand, Vsolid, Vvoid :
-
Volume of cement, sand, solids, and voids
- V total :
-
Total volume of the specimen
- w/c :
-
Water–cement ratio
- w soil :
-
Water content of soil
- XRD:
-
X-ray diffraction
References
ASTM (2013) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil: ASTMD2166/D2166M. ASTM, West Conshohocken
Cardoso R (2016) Porosity and tortuosity influence on geophysical properties of an artificially cemented sand. Eng Geol 211:198–207
Cardoso R, Ribeiro D, Néri R (2017) Bonding effect on the evolution with curing time of compressive and tensile strength of sand–cement mixtures. Soils Found 57(4):655–668
Chian SC, Nguyen ST, Phoon KK (2016) Extended strength development model of cement-treated clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142(2):06015014
Clough G, Iwabuchi J, Rad N, Kuppusamy T (1989) Influence of cementation on liquefaction of sands. J Geotech Eng 115(8):1102–1117
Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, Heineck KS (2007) Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(2):197–205
Consoli NC, Dalla Rosa F, Fonini A (2009) Plate load tests on cemented soil layers overlaying weaker soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):1846–1856
Dupas J, Pecker A (1979) Static and dynamic properties of sand–cement. J Geotech Eng Div 105(3):419–436
Ho LS, Nakarai K, Duc M, Le Kouby A, Maachi A, Sasaki T (2018) Analysis of strength development in cement-treated soils under different curing conditions through microstructural and chemical investigations. Constr Build Mater 166:634–646
Horpibulsuk S, Miura N, Nagaraj TS (2003) Assessment of strength development in cement-admixed high water content clays with Abrams’ law as a basis. Géotechnique 53(4):439–444
Kaniraj SR, Havanagi VG (1999) Compressive strength of cement stabilized fly ash-soil mixtures. Cement Concrete Res 29(5):673–677
Lee F-H, Lee Y, Chew S-H, Yong K-Y (2005) Strength and modulus of marine clay-cement mixes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(2):178–186
Liu H-L, Deng A, Chu J (2006) Effect of different mixing ratios of polystyrene pre-puff beads and cement on the mechanical behaviour of lightweight fill. Geotext Geomembr 24(6):331–338
Liu Y, He LQ, Jiang YJ, Sun MM, Chen EJ, Lee F-H (2018) Effect of in situ water content variation on the spatial variation of strength of deep cement-mixed clay. Géotechnique (in press)
Lorenzo GA, Bergado DT (2004) Fundamental parameters of cement-admixed clay—new approach. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(10):1042–1050
Pamuk A, Gallagher PM, Zimmie TF (2007) Remediation of piled foundations against lateral spreading by passive site stabilization technique. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(9):864–874
Park S-S (2010) Effect of wetting on unconfined compressive strength of cemented sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1713–1720
Rattley MJ, Lehane BM, Consoli NC, Richards DJ (2008) Uplift of shallow foundations with cement-stabilised backfill. Proc Inst Civil Eng Ground Improv 161(2):103–110
Rios S, Da Fonseca A, Baudet BA (2014) On the shearing behaviour of an artificially cemented soil. Acta Geotech 9(2):215–226
Stracke F, Jung JG, Korf EP, Consoli NC (2012) The influence of moisture content on tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. Soils Rocks 35(3):303–308
Subramanian S, Moon S-W, Moon J, Ku T (2018) CSA-treated sand for geotechnical application: microstructure analysis and rapid strength development. J Mater Civil Eng 30(12):4018313
Towhata I (2007) Developments of soil improvement technologies for mitigation of liquefaction risk. In: Earthquake geotechnical engineering: proceedings of 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering-invited lectures. Springer, Berlin, pp 355–383
Vinoth G, Moon S-W, Moon J, Ku T (2018) Early strength development in cement-treated sand using low-carbon rapid-hardening cements. Soils Found 58(5):1200–1211
**ao H, Lee FH, Chin KG (2014) Yielding of cement-treated marine clay. Soils Found 54(3):488–501
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE), Award No. R-302-000-194-114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
According to the definition given by Consoli et al. [6], it is straightforward to have the following equation:
where Vvoid, Vcement, and Vtotal are the volume of voids, the volume of cement, and the total volume of the sample, respectively. The following equation can be obtained by modifying Eq. 9.
where Vsolid is the volume of solids (sand particles and cement particles). Noting that Vsolid = Vcement + Vsand, where Vsand is the volume of sand particles, Eq. 10 can be further derived as follows:
where mcement and msand are the mass of cement and sand, respectively. Then, Eq. 6 (also Eq. 12) can be finally derived by substituting mcement = cc·msand as follows:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, X., Ku, T. New design chart for geotechnical ground improvement: characterizing cement-stabilized sand. Acta Geotech. 15, 999–1011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00838-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00838-2