Log in

Primary fabric fraction analysis of granular soils

  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Granular soil can be considered as a composition of two fractions of particles; an immobile part called the primary fabric, and loose particles located in the voids formed by the immobile part considered to be potentially mobile. The primary fabric transfers momentum through force chains formed by interconnected force chains. These force chains form pores where loose particles are located. As a consequence, loose particles can be mobilised very easily under the influence of seepage flow and transported away if the geometrical conditions of the pore structure allows it. Therefore, the determination of the primary fabric fraction, as well as loose particle fraction, is of vital importance especially in soil suffusion predictions, which must be thoroughly considered in the design of hydraulic structures or their risk assessment. This paper presents a new method to simulate the behaviour of soils under stress and introduces a numerical analysis to define the primary fabric fraction. To achieve this, soil specimens are built by a new sequential packing method, which employs trilateration equations for packing. Later, specimens are compacted under oedometric conditions using the discrete element method to observe how the loading force is distributed across the solid matrix and to identify the fraction of the soil sustaining the external force. The primary fabric fraction analysis is conducted on two types of soil particle arrangements with several grain size distributions. A striking finding of this study is that the portion of the soil belonging to the primary fabric greatly depends on the structural packing of the granular particles. This finding should be used as evidence for the formulation of more accurate criteria for the prediction of suffusion and erosion in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bagi K (2005) An algorithm to generate random dense arrangements for discrete element simulations of granular assemblies. Granul Matter 7(1):31–43

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Belheine N et al (2009) Numerical simulation of drained triaxial test using 3D discrete element modeling. Comput Geotech 36(1):320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezrukov A, Bargieł M, Stoyan D (2002) Statistical analysis of simulated random packings of spheres. Part Part Syst Charact 19(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buechler S, Johnson S (2013) Efficient generation of densely packed convex polyhedra for 3D discrete and finite-discrete element methods. Int J Numer Methods Eng 94(1):1–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Burenkova V (1993) Assessment of suffusion in non-cohesive and graded soils. In: Brauns J, Schuler U (eds) Filters in geotechnical and hydraulic engineering. Balkema, Rotterdam

  6. Cundall PA, Strack OD (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) Discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(4):77

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Addetta GA (2004) Discrete models for cohesive frictional materials. D93-Dissertation an der Universität Stuttgart, p 202. ISBN 2-00-014015-8

  9. Foster M, Fell R, Spannagle M (2000) The statistics of embankment dam failures and accidents. Can Geotech J 37:25

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galindo-Torres S, Muñoz J, Alonso-Marroquin F (2010) Minkowski-Voronoi diagrams as a method to generate random packings of spheropolygons for the simulation of soils. Phys Rev E 82(5):056713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galindo-Torres S, Pedroso D, Williams D, Li L (2012) Breaking processes in three-dimensional bonded granular materials with general shapes. Comput Phys Commun 183(2):266–277

  12. Galindo-Torres S et al (2012) Breaking processes in three-dimensional bonded granular materials with general shapes. Comput Phys Commun 183(2):266–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galindo-Torres S et al (2013) A micro-mechanical approach for the study of contact erosion. Acta Geotech 1–12. doi:10.1007/s11440-013-0282-z

  14. Indraratna B, Nguyen VT, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011) Assessing the Potential of Internal Erosion and Suffusion of Granular Soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137:550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Indraratna B, Raut AK, Khabbaz H (2007) Constriction-based retention criterion for granular filter design. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(3):266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenney T et al (1985) Controlling constriction sizes of granular filters. Can Geotech J 22(1):32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kenney T, Lau D (1985) Internal stability of granular filters. Can Geotech J 22(2):215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lind PG, Baram RM, Herrmann HJ (2008) Obtaining the size distribution of fault gouges with polydisperse bearings. Phys Rev E 77(2):021304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Locke M, Indraratna B, Adikari G (2001) Time-dependent particle transport through granular filters. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(6):521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luding S (2008) Cohesive, frictional powders: contact models for tension. Granul Matter 10(4):235–246

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Mechsys homepage. Available from: http://mechsys.nongnu.org/index.shtml

  22. Oñate E et al (2011) Advances in the particle finite element method (PFEM) for solving coupled problems in engineering. In: Oñate E, Owen R (eds) Particle-based methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–49

  23. Reboul N, Vincens E, Cambou B (2010) A computational procedure to assess the distribution of constriction sizes for an assembly of spheres. Comput Geotech 37(1):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reboul N, Vincens E, Cambou B (2010) A computational procedure to assess the distribution of constriction sizes for an assembly of spheres. Comput Geotech 37:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sadaghiani MS, Witt K (2011) Variability of the grain size distribution of a soil related to suffusion. In: Vogt, Schuppener, Straub, Bräu (eds) Paper presented at the 3rd international symposium on geotechnical risk and safety (ISGSR) 2011, Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau. ISBN 978-3-939230-01-4

  26. Scholtès L, Hicher P-Y, Sibille L (2010) Multiscale approaches to describe mechanical responses induced by particle removal in granular materials. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 338(10):627–638

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Sherard JL (1979) Sinkholes in dams of coarse, broadly graded soils. In: 13th congress on large dams. New Delhi, India

  28. Shire T, O’Sullivan C (2013) Micromechanical assessment of an internal stability criterion. Acta Geotech 8(1):81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sjah J, Vincens E (2011) A comparison of different methods to compute the constriction size distribution for granular filters. In: 13th international conference of the IACMAG. Melbourne

  30. Skempton AW, Brogan JM (1994) Experiments on pi** in sandy gravels. Géotechnique 44(3):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. To HD, Scheuermann A, Williams DJ (2012) A new simple model for the determination of the pore constriction size distribution. In: 6th international conference on scour and erosion. Societe Hydrotechnique de France, Paris, pp 60–68

  32. To HD, Scheuermann A, Williams DJ (2012) A new simple model for the determination of the pore constriction size distribution. In: 6th international conference on scour and erosion (ICSE-6). Société Hydrotechnique de France (SHF)

  33. Vincens E, Witt KJ, Homberg U (2014) Approaches to determine the constriction size distribution for understanding filtration phenomena in granular materials. Acta Geotech 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11440-014-0308-1

  34. Wan CF, Fell R (2008) Assessing the potential of internal instability and suffusion in embankment dams and their foundations. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 134:401

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author was granted a scholarship from the Vietnamese Ministry of Education and Training (MOET) and a top-up scholarship from the Graduate School of The University of Queensland (UQ). The presented research is part of the Discovery Project (DP120102188) Hydraulic erosion of granular structures: experiments and computational simulations were funded by the Australian Research Council. The simulations were based on Mechsys, an open source library and carried out using the Macondo Cluster from the School of Civil Engineering at The University of Queensland. The first author also obtained benefit from the GSITA of UQ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huu Duc To.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

To, H.D., Galindo Torres, S.A. & Scheuermann, A. Primary fabric fraction analysis of granular soils. Acta Geotech. 10, 375–387 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0353-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0353-9

Keywords

Navigation