Log in

A modified PANS model for computations of unsteady turbulence cavitating flows

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modification to the PANS (partially averaged Navier-Stokes) model is proposed to simulate unsteady cavitating flows. In the model, the parameter f k is modified to vary as a function of the ratios between the water density and the mixture density in the local flows. The objective of this study is to validate the modified model and further understand the interaction between turbulence and cavitation around a Clark-Y hydrofoil. The comparisons between the numerical and experiment results show that the modified model can be improved to predict the cavity evolution, vortex shedding frequency and the lift force fluctuating in time fairly well, as it can effectively modulate the eddy viscosity in the cavitating region and various levels of physical turbulent fluctuations are resolved. In addition, from the computational results, it is proved that cavitation phenomenon physically influences the turbulent level, especially by the vortex shedding behaviors. Also, the mean u-velocity profiles demonstrate that the attached cavity thickness can alter the local turbulent shear layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coutier D O, Reboud J L, Delannoy Y. Numerical simulation of the unsteady behavior of cavitating flows. Int J Numer Meth Fluids, 2003, 42: 527–548

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu J Y, Wang G Y, Shyy W. Time-dependent turbulent cavitating ow computations with interfacial transport and filter-based models. Int J Numer Meth Fluids, 2005, 49: 739–761

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Delannoy Y, Kueny J L. Two-phase flow approach in unsteady cavitation modeling cavitation and multiphase flow forum. ASME-FED, 1990, 98: 153–158

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coutier D O, Fortes P R, Reboud J L. Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation. J Fluids Eng, 2003, 125(1): 38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kubota A, Kato H, Yamaguchi H, et al. Unsteady structure measurement of cloud cavitation on a Foil section using conditional sampling technique. J Fluid Eng, 1989, 111(2): 204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singhal A K, Vaidya N, Leonard A D. Multi-dimensional simulation of cavitating flows using a PDF model for phase change. In: ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting. ASME Paper, 1997, FEDSM1997-3272

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merkle CL, Feng J, Buelow P E O. Computational modelling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation. In: 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, France, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kunz R F, Boger D A, Stinebring D R, et al. A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Comput Fluids, 2000, 29: 849–875

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Senocak I, Shyy W. Interfacial dynamics-based modelling of turbulent cavitating flows, part-2: Time-dependent computations. Int J Numer Methods Fluids, 2004, 44: 997–1016

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu J, Johansen S T, Shyy W. Filter-based unsteady RANS computations for single-phase and cavitating flows. In: ASME Heat Transfer/Fluids Engineering Summer Conference. ASME Paper, 2004, HT-FED2004-56181

    Google Scholar 

  11. Launder B E, Spalding D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 1974, 3: 269–289

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spalart P. Strategies for turbulence modeling and simulations. Eng Turbulence Modelling Exp, 1999, 4: 3–17

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khorrami M R, Singer B, Berkman M E. Time accurate simulations and acoustic analysis of slat free shear layer. AIAA J, 2002, 40(7): 1284–1291

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Girimaji S. Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model for turbulence: A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes to direct numerical simulation bridging method. J Appl Mech, 2006, 73: 413–421

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansen S T, Wu J, Shyy W. Filter-based unsteady RANS computations. Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2004, 25(1): 10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinzel M P, Lindau J W, Peltier L J, et al. Detached-eddy simulations for cavitating flows. In: 18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Miami, FL, 2007. 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ji B, Luo X W, Wu Y L, et al. Unsteady cavitating flow around a hydrofoil simulated using the partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model. Chin Phys Lett, 2012, 29(7): 076401

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang B, Wang G Y. Partially averaged Navier-Stokes method for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flows. J Hydrodyn, 2011, 23(1): 26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Queipo N V, Haftka R T, Shyy W, et al. Surrogate-based analysis and optimization. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2005, 41: 1–28

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang B, Wang G Y. Experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating flows through a 2D hydrofoil. Sci China-Tech Sci, 2011, 54(7): 1801–1812

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeong E, Girimaji S. Partially averaged Navier Stokes model for turbulence simulations-flow past a square cylinder. J Fluids Eng, 2010, 132: 121203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goel T, Haftka R T, Shyy W, et al. Ensemble of surrogates. J Struct Multidisc Optim, 2007, 33(3): 199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Goel T, Haftka R T, Queipo N V, et al. Performance estimate and simultaneous application of multiple surrogates. In: 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, 2006. 6–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang G Y, Senocak I, Shyy W. Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2001, 37(6): 551–581

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang B, Young Y L, Wang G Y, et al. Combined experimental and computational investigation of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation. J Fluids Eng, 2013, 135: 071301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aeschlimann V, Barre S, Djeridi H. Velocity field analysis in an experimental cavitating mixing layer. Phys Fluids, 2011, 23: 055105

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sahner J, Weinkauf T, Hege H C. Galilean invariant extraction and iconic representation of vortex core lines. Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization, UK, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim S, Brewton S. A multiphase approach to turbulent cavitating flows. In: Proceedings of 27th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  29. Coutier D O. Numerical prediction of cavitation flow on a two-dimensional symmetrical hydrofoil and comparison to experiments. J Fluids Eng, 2007, 129(3): 279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChangLi Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, C., Wang, G., Chen, G. et al. A modified PANS model for computations of unsteady turbulence cavitating flows. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57, 1967–1976 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-014-5538-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-014-5538-6

Keywords

Navigation