Log in

Hierarchical path planning for multi-arm spacecraft with general translational and rotational locomotion mode

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On-orbit construction and maintenance technology will play a significant role in future space exploration. The dexterous multifunctional spacecraft equipped with multi-arm, for instance, SpiderFab Bot, has attracted a great deal of focus due to its versatility in completing these missions. In such engineering practice, point-to-point moving in a complex environment is the fundamental issue. This paper investigates the three-dimensional point-to-point path planning problem, and a hierarchical path planning architecture is developed to give the trajectory of the multi-arm spacecraft effectively and efficiently. In the proposed 3-level architecture, the high-level planner generates the global constrained centric trajectory of the spacecraft with a rigid envelop assumption; the middle-level planner contributes the action sequence, a combination of the newly developed general translational and rotational locomotion mode, to cope with the relative position and attitude of the arms about the centroid of the spacecraft; the low-level planner maps the position/attitude of the end-effector of each arm from the operational space to the joint space optimally. Finally, the simulation experiment is carried out, and the results verify the effectiveness of the proposed three-layer architecture path planning strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li W J, Cheng D Y, Liu X G, et al. On-orbit service (OOS) of spacecraft: A review of engineering developments. Prog Aerospace Sci, 2019, 108: 32–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding X L, Wang Y C, Wang Y B, et al. A review of structures, verification, and calibration technologies of space robotic systems for on-orbit servicing. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 462–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boning P, Dubowsky S. Coordinated control of space robot teams for the on-orbit construction of large flexible space structures. Adv Robotics, 2010, 24: 303–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoyt R P, Cushing J, Jimmerson G, et al. Spiderfab: Process for on orbit construction of kilometer-scale apertures. Technical report. NASA Headquarters, Washington D C, 2018. HQ-E-DAA-TN62833, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deremetz M, Gerhard G, Cavenago F, et al. Concept of operations andpreliminary design of a modular multi-arm robot using standard interconnects for on-orbit large assembly. In: Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress (IAC). Dubai, 2021

  6. Henshaw C G. The darpa phoenix spacecraft servicing program: Overview and plans for risk reduction. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS). Montreal, 2014

  7. Hoyt R P. Spiderfab: An architecture for self-fabricating space systems. In: Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition. IAAA, San Diego, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yue C F, Wei C, Cao X B, et al. A kind of implemental spacecraft system facing on-orbit manipulation missions. China Patent, CN114162353A, 2021

  9. Zhang Y, Zhang J X, Ren L Q. The terrestrial locomotion of a mole cricket with foreleg amputation. Sci China Tech Sci, 2015, 58: 999–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. **e Z, Chen X, Chen D, et al. Initial design and implementation of a space quadruped crawling robot prototype. Adv Astronaut Sci Technol, 2021, 4: 173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miao C W, Chen G Z, Yan C L, et al. Path planning optimization of indoor mobile robot based on adaptive ant colony algorithm. Comput Indust Eng, 2021, 156: 107–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. **ang D, Lin H, Ouyang J, et al. Combined improved A and greedy algorithm for path planning of multi-objective mobile robot. Sci Rep, 2022, 12: 13273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oroko J A, Nyakoe G N. Obstacle avoidance and path planningschemes for autonomous navigation of a mobile robot: A review. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Sustainable Research & Innovation (SRI) Conference. Pretoria, 2022. 314–318

  14. Mo Y, Jiang Z H, Li H, et al. A kind of biomimetic control method to anthropomorphize a redundant manipulator for complex tasks. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tian Y, Gao F, Liu J M, et al. Step rolling planning of a six-legged robot with 1-DOF waist for slope climbing. Sci China Tech Sci, 2019, 62: 597–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mao L H, Tian Y, Gao F, et al. Novel method of gait switching in six-legged robot walking on continuous-nondifferentiable terrain by utilizing stability and interference criteria. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2527–2540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spröwitz A, Tuleu A, Vespignani M, et al. Towards dynamic trot gait locomotion: Design, control, and experiments with Cheetah-cub, a compliant quadruped robot. Int J Robotics Res, 2013, 32: 932–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kang R J, Guglielmino E, Branson D T, et al. Bio-inspired crawlinglocomotion of a multi-arm octopus-like continuum system. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Vilamoura-Algarve, 2012

  19. Li Y, Zi B, Yang Z M, et al. Combined kinematic and static analysis of an articulated lower limb traction device for a rehabilitation robotic system. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1189–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ding X L, Wang Z Y, Rovetta A, et al. Locomotion analysis of hexapod robot. Climb Walk Rob, 2010, 30: 291–310

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Li P, Quan J, et al. Progress, challenges, and prospects of soft robotics for space applications. Adv Intell Syst, 2022, 2200071

  22. Martínez-Moritz J, Rodríguez I, Nottensteiner K, et al. Hybrid planningsystem for in-space robotic assembly of telescopes using segment-edmirror tiles. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100). Big Sky, 2021. 1–16

  23. Doyle R, Kubota T, Picard M, et al. Recent research and development activities on space robotics and AI. Adv Robotics, 2021, 35: 1244–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scherzinger S, Weinland J, Wilbrandt R, et al. A walking spacerobot for on-orbit satellite servicing: The recobot. ar**v: 2203.10217

  25. Adinehvand M, Asadi E, Lai C Y, et al. Bogiebot: A climbing robot incluttered confined space of bogies with ferrous metal surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Prague, 2021. 2459–2466

  26. Sheng X J, Tang L, Huang X J, et al. Operational-space wrench and acceleration capability analysis for multi-link cable-driven robots. Sci China Tech Sci, 2020, 63: 2063–2072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. You B D, Wen X L, Liu Y Q, et al. Gait analysis of cellular space robotfor on-orbit climbing truss. J Astronaut, 2020, 41: 521–530

    Google Scholar 

  28. Feng J K, Liu J G. Configuration analysis of a chain-type reconfigurable modular robot inspired by normal alkane. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1167–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang L. Gait analysis of a novel biomimetic climbing robot. J Mech Eng, 2010, 46: 17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramón J L, Calvo R, Trujillo A, et al. Trajectory optimization and control of a free-floating two-arm humanoid robot. J Guidance Control Dyn, 2022, 45: 1661–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao J D, Han J G, Ni F L. Gait planning and study of climbingrobot with three branches for space station truss. Man Space, 2018, 24: 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  32. McBryan K. Comparison between stationary and crawling multi-armrobotics for in-space assembly. In: Proceedings of 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Las Vegas, 2020. 1849–1856

  33. Tang T, Hou X, **ao Y, et al. Research on motion characteristics of space truss-crawling robot. Int J Adv Robotic Syst, 2019, 16: 172988141882157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun T S, Wang Y H, Yang S Q, et al. Design, hydrodynamic analysis, and testing of a bioinspired controllable wing mechanism with multi-locomotion modes for hybrid-driven underwater gliders. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2688–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang W. Research on autonomous navigation method for indoor robots based on multisensor fusion. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yue C F, Zhang X, Wang H X, et al. Three-dimensional path planning of on-orbit manipulation robot based on neighborhood continuation search. J Astronaut, 2022, 43: 206–213

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Y X, Dong W, Ding Y. An efficient method for collision-free and jerk-constrained trajectory generation with sparse desired way-points for a flying robot. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1719–1731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Leve F A. Evaluation of steering algorithm optimality for singlegimbal control moment gyroscopes. IEEE Trans on Contr Sys Tech, 2013, 22: 1130–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Li C Y, Li Z Q, Jiang Z N, et al. Autonomous planning and control strategy for space manipulators with dynamics uncertainty based on learning from demonstrations. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2662–2675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kenwright B. Inverse kinematics—Cyclic Coordinate Descent (CCD). J Graphics Tools, 2012, 16: 177–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Muller-Cajar R, Mukundan R. Triangualation—A new algorithm for inverse kinematics. In Proceedings of Image and Vision Computing New Zealand 2007. New Zealand, 2007

  42. Sun H W, Yang J X, Li D W, et al. An on-line tool path smoothing algorithm for 6R robot manipulator with geometric and dynamic constraints. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 1907–1919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ananthanarayanan H, Ordóñez R. Real-time inverse kinematics of (2n+1) DOF hyper-redundant manipulator arm via a combined numerical and analytical approach. Mech Mach Theor, 2015, 91: 209–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu Z H, Yuan H, Xu W F, et al. A geometric method based on space arc for pose-configuration simultaneous planning of segmented hyper-redundant manipulators. Sci China Tech Sci, 2021, 64: 2389–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Maric F, Giamou M, Hall A W, et al. Riemannian optimization for distance-geometric inverse kinematics. IEEE Trans Robot, 2022, 38: 1703–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shi Y, Li L, Yang J, et al. Center-based transfer feature learning with classifier adaptation for surface defect recognition. Mech Syst Signal Pr, 2023, 188: 110001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yue C F, Wei C, Cao X, et al. A virtual scene simulation system forspace on-orbit manipulation. China Patent, CN114218702A, 2021

  48. Yue C F, Wei C, Cao X, et al. A ground test platform, system, andmethod for multi-arm spacecraft system. China Patent, CN114261543A, 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **Bin Cao.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62003115 and 11972130), and the Shenzhen Natural Science Fund (the Stable Support Plan Program GXWD20201230155427003-20200821170719001).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yue, C., Lin, T., Zhang, X. et al. Hierarchical path planning for multi-arm spacecraft with general translational and rotational locomotion mode. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 66, 1180–1191 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2275-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-022-2275-2

Navigation