Log in

Validation of dynamic cavitation model for unsteady cavitating flow on NACA66

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unsteady cavitating flow is extremely complicated and brings more serious damages and unignorable problems compared with steady cavitating flow. CFD has become a practical way to model cavitation; however, the popularly used full cavitation model cannot reflect the pressure-change that the bubble experiences during its life path in the highly unsteady flow like cloud cavitating. Thus a dynamic cavitation model (DCM) is proposed and it has been considered to have not only the first-order pressure effects but also zero-order effect and can provide greater insight into the physical process of bubble producing, develo** and collapsing compared to the traditional cavitation model. DCM has already been validated for steady cavitating flow, and the results were reported. Furthermore, DCM is designed and supposed to be more accurate and efficient in modeling unsteady cavitating flow, which is also the purpose of this paper. The basic characteristic of the unsteady cavitating flow, such as the vapor volume fraction distribution and the evolution of pressure amplitude and frequency at different locations of the hydrofoil, are carefully studied to validate DCM. It is found that not only these characteristics mentioned above accord well with the experimental results, but also some detailed transient flow information is depicted, including the re-entrant jet flow that caused the shedding of the cavity, and the phenomenon of two-peak pressure fluctuation in the vicinity of the cavity closure in a cycle. The numerical results validate the capability of DCM for the application of modeling the complicated unsteady cavitating flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coutier D O, Reboud J L, Delannoy Y. Numerical simulation of the unsteady behaviour of cavitating flows. Int J Numer Meth Fl, 2003, 42: 527–548

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Coutier D O, Fortes P R, Reboud J L. Simulation of unsteady cavitation with a two-equation turbulence model including compressibility effects. J Turbul, 2002, 3: 058–075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu C J, He Y S, Chen X, et al. Numerical and experimental research on cavitating flows. New Trends in Fluid Mechanics Research. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Fluid Mechanics, 2007. 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  4. Senocak I, Shyy W. Interfacial dynamics-based modelling of turbulent cavitating flows, Part-1: Model development and steady-state computations. Int J Numer meth Fl, 2004, 44: 975–995

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Singhal A K, Athavale M M, Li H Y. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME, 2002, 124: 617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Senocak I, Shyy W. Evaluation of cavitation models for Navier-Stoke computation. Proc FEDSM, 2002, 2: 31011

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang B, Wang G Y, Yu Z Y, et al. Detached-eddy simulation for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flows. Chin J Mech Eng-en, 2012, 25: 484–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Merkle C L, Feng J, Buelow P E O. Computational modeling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation, Grenoble, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kunz R F, Boger D A, Stinebring D R, et al. A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Comput Fluids, 2000, 29: 849–875

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Senocak I, Shyy W. Interfacial dynamics-based modelling of turbulent cavitating flows, Part-2: Time-dependent computations. Int J Numer meth Fl, 2004, 44: 997–1016

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sauer J, Schnerr G H. Unsteady cavitating flow: a new cavitation model based on a modified front capturing method and bubble dynamics. In: Proceedings of ASME Fluid Engineering Summer Conference, Boston, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang X B, Qiu L M, Gao Y, et al. Computational fluid dynamic study on cavitation in liquid nitrogen. Cryogenics, 2008, 48: 432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao X L, Zhang X B, Qiu L M, et al. Validation of full cavitation model in cryogenic fluids. Chin Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 1633–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lohrberg H, Stoffel B, Fortes P R, et al. Numerical and experimental investigations on the cavitating flow in a cascade of hydrofoils. Exp Fluids, 2002, 33: 578–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park S, Rhee S H. Numerical analysis of the three-dimensional cloud cavitating flow around a twisted hydrofoil. Fluid Dyn Res, 2013, 45: 1–10

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ji B, Luo X, Wu Y, et al. Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horse-shoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil. Int J Multiphase Flow, 2013, 51: 33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang X B, WU Z, **ang S J, et al. Modeling cavitation flow of cryogenic fluids with thermodynamic phase-change theory. Chin Sci Bull, 2013, 58: 567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosangadi A, Ahuja V. Numerical study of cavitation in cryogenic fluids. J Fluid Eng Trans ASME, 2005, 127: 267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu J Y, Wang G Y, Shyy W. Time-dependent turbulent cavitating flow computations with interfacial transport and filter-based models. Int J Numer Meth Fl, 2005, 49: 739–761

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Tseng, C C. Turbulence and cavitation models for time-dependent turbulent cavitating flow. Acta Mech Sinica, 2011, 4: 473–487

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leroux J B, Astolfi J A, Billard J Y. An experimental study of unsteady partial cavitation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME, 2004, 126: 94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ji B, Luo X W, Peng X X, et al. Three-dimensional large eddy simulation and vorticity analysis of unsteady cavitating flow around a twisted hydrofoil. J Hydrod, 2013, 25: 510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang B, Yin L Y, Wang G Y, et al. Combined experimental and computational investigation of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME, 2013, 135: 0713017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leroux J B, Coutier D O, Astolfi J A. A joint experimental and numerical study of mechanisms associated to instability of partial cavitation on two-dimensional hydrofoil. Phys Fluids, 2005, 17, 052101: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. Callenaere M, Franc J P, Michel J. The cavitation instability induced by the development of a re-entrant jet. J Fluid Mech, 2001, 444: 223–256

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Kubota A, Kato H, Yamaguchiy H. A new modelling of cavitating flows: a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section. J Fluid Mech, 1992, 240: 59–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ji B, Luo X W, Wu Y L. Unsteady cavitating flow around a hydrofoil simulated using the partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model. Chin Phys Lett, 2012, 076401: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang B, Wang G Y. Experimental and numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating flows through a 2D hydrofoil. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 54: 1801–1812

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DaMing Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Zhang, W., Chen, J. et al. Validation of dynamic cavitation model for unsteady cavitating flow on NACA66. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57, 819–827 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5506-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5506-4

Keywords

Navigation