Log in

Genetics with Jean: the design, development and evaluation of an affective tutoring system

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper details the design, development and evaluation of an affective tutoring system (ATS)—an e-learning system that detects and responds to the emotional states of the learner. Research into the development of ATS is an active and relatively new field, with many studies demonstrating promising results. However, there is often no practical way to apply these findings in real-world settings. The ATS described in this paper utilizes a generic affective application model to infer and appropriately respond to the learner’s affective state. This approach brings several advantages, notably the potential direct support for re-use and retrospective addition of affect sensing functionality into existing e-learning software. Skin conductivity and heart rate variability measurements were used to infer affective activation and valence. The evaluation involved an experiment in which the effectiveness of the fully functional ATS was compared with that of a non-affective version, and was conducted with 40 adult participants. The evaluation of the effectiveness of this tutoring system showed that measurable improvements in perceived learning may be obtained with a modest level of software development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afzal, S., & Robinson, P. (2011). Designing for automatic affect inference in learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aist, G., Kort, B., Reilly, R., Mostow, J., & Picard, R. (2002). Experimentally augmenting an intelligent tutoring system with human-supplied capabilities: Adding human-provided emotional scaffolding to an automated reading tutor that listens. In 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (pp. 483-490). Pittsburgh, PA, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

  • Alavi, M., Marakas, G., & Yoo, Y. (2002). A comparative study of distributed learning environments on learning outcomes. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 404–415. doi:10.1287/isre.13.4.404.72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alepis, E., & Virvou, M. (2011). Automatic generation of emotions in tutoring agents for affective e-learning in medical education. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 9840–9847. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alepis, E., Virvou, M., & Kabassi, K. (2008). Requirements analysis and design of an affective bi-modal intelligent tutoring system: the case of keyboard and microphone. In M. Virvou & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent Interactive Systems in Knowedge-Based Environments. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S. (2007). An affect-sensitive intelligent tutoring system with an animated pedagogical agent that adapts to human emotion. Albany: Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S., Sarrafzadeh, A., & Hill, S. (2006). Easy with Eve: A functional affective tutoring system. In G. Rebolledo-Mendez, & E. Martinez-Miron (Ed.), Proceedings of Workshop on Motivational and Affective Issues in ITS. 8th International Conference on ITS (pp. 38-45).

  • Ammar, M. B., Neji, M., Alimi, A. M., & Gouardères, G. (2010). The affective tutoring system. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3013–3023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BioPac Systems (2004). Heart rate variability analysis. http://www.biopac.com/Curriculum/pdf/h32.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2012.

  • Bower, G. H., & Forgas, J. P. (2001). Mood and social memory. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 95–120). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. G. (2001). Using computers to deliver training: which employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 271–296. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00093.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C., & Gage, N. L. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology Education, 11, 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition (pp. 121–144). Nahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user’s emotions in educational games. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16(7–8), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conati, C., & Zhao, X. (2004). Building and evaluating an intelligent pedagogical agent to improve the effectiveness of an educational game. In 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 6-13). Funchal, Madeira, Portugal: ACM.

  • Craig, S. D., Graesser, A. C., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2005). Positive affect as implicit motivator: on the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cytowic, R. E. (1989). Synesthesia: A Union of the Senses. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S. (2008). Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(1–2), 45–80. doi:10.1007/s11257-007-9037-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012a). AutoTutor and affective autotutor learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2(4), 1–39. doi:10.1145/2395123.2395128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012b). Emotions during learning with AutoTutor. In P. Durlach & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education (pp. 117–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., & Graesser, A. (2011). A motivationally supportive affect-sensitive AutoTutor. In R. A. Calvo, & S. K. D’Mello (Ed.), New perspectives on affect and learning technologies (Vol. 3, pp. 113-126, Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies): Springer New York.

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. C., & Ashbrook, P. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effects of depressed mood states on memory. In K. Fiedler & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, Cognition and Social Behavior (pp. 25–43). Gottingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: the processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6(6), 409–434. doi:10.1080/02699939208409696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1986). The Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, F., Su, R., & Yu, S. (2009). EGameFlow: a scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, J., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381–391. doi:10.1080/00223980.1994.9712742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Y., Sucar, L. E., & Conati, C. (2008). An affective behavior model for intelligent tutors. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 819-821). Montreal, Canada: Springer-Verlag.

  • Hernández, Y., Sucar, L. E., & Conati, C. (2009). Incorporating an affective behavior model into an educational game. In Twenty Second International FLAIRS Conference. Florida, USA.

  • Hone, K. (2006). Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: the effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with Computers, 18(2), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C.-L., & Lu, H.-P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? an extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853–868. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, M. (2000). A study of factors influencing students’ perceived learning in a web-based course environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaklauskas, A., Kuzminske, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Daniunas, A., Kaklauskas, G., Seniut, M., et al. (2015). Affective tutoring system for built environment management. Computers & Education, 82, 202–216. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. (2012). The role of affective and motivational factors in designing personalized learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 563–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., & Shen, E. (2007). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 23(3), 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, D. (1997). The Sentic Mouse : Develo** a tool for measuring emotional valence. http://affect.media.mit.edu/projectpages/archived/projects/sentic_mouse.html. Accessed 5th Nov 2012.

  • Klein, J., Moon, Y., & Picard, R. W. (2002). This computer responds to user frustration: theory, design and results. Interacting with Computers, 14(2), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy—Building a learning companion. In IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Madison, USA, 2001 (pp. 43-48).

  • Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. C. K., Chao, C.-J., & Huang, T.-C. (2015). From a perspective on foreign language learning anxiety to develop an affective tutoring system. [journal article]. Educational Technology Research and Development., 63(5), 727–747. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9385-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, A. C. H., Fernandez, W. D., & Gregor, S. (2012). Understanding web enjoyment experiences and informal learning: a study in a museum context. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 846–858. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. C. K., Su, S. H., Chao, C. J., Hsieh, C. Y., & Tsai, S. C. (2016). Construction of multi-mode affective learning system: taking affective design as an example. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisetti, C. L. A user model of emotion-cognition. In Workshop on Attitude, Personality, and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction at the International Conference on User-Modeling (UM’99), Banff, Canada, 1999.

  • Litman, D. J., & Silliman, S. (2004). ITSPOKE: An intelligent tutoring spoken dialogue system. In Human Language Technology Conference 4th Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 5-8). Boston, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.

  • Lowendahl, J.-M. (2012). Hype Cycle for Education. http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=233974&ref=g_sitelink. Accessed 1st September 2012.

  • Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Estrella, G. (2014). Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction, 33, 12–18. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft Corporation (2009). Microsoft Agent. http://www.microsoft.com/products/msagent/main.aspx. Accessed 22 June 2012.

  • Molster, C., Charles, T., Samanek, A., & O’Leary, P. (2009). Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health. Public Health Genomics, 12(2), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R. (2005). Multimedia learning with animated pedagogical agents. In R. Mayer (Ed.), TheCambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 507–524). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 22(3), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective Computing. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendinger, H., Dohi, H., Wang, H., Mayer, S., & Ishizuka, M. (2004). Empathic embodied interfaces: Addressing users’ affective state. In E. André, L. Dybkjær, W. Minker, & P. Heisterkamp (Ed.), Tutorial and Research Workshop on Affective Dialogue Systems 2004 (pp. 53-64, Lecture Notes in Computer Science). Kloster Irsee, Germany: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.

  • Richards, M. (1996). Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance. Public Understanding of Science, 5(3), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarrafzadeh, A., Alexander, S., Dadgostar, F., Fan, C., & Bigdeli, A. (2008). ‘‘How do you know that I don’t understand?’’ a look at the future of intelligent tutoring systems. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(4), 1342–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behaviour (pp. 527–561). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? the informative function of affective states. In K. Fiedler & I. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior (pp. 44–62). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009). Affective e-learning: using “emotional” data to improve learning in pervasive learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 176–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofer, W., & Gribbin, M. (2010). Morgan : A genetics tutorial. http://morgan.rutgers.edu/MorganWebFrames/How_to_use/HTU_Frameset.html. Accessed 1 August 2010.

  • Stein, N. L., & Levine, L. J. (1991). Making sense out of emotion. In W. Kessen, A. Ortony, & F. Kraik (Eds.), Memories, Thoughts, and Emotions: Essays in Honor of George Mandler (pp. 295–322). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susarla, S., Adcock, A., Van Eck, R., Moreno, K., & Graesser, A. Development and evaluation of a lesson authoring tool for AutoTutor. In Artifical Intelligence in Education Conference, Sydney, Australia, 2003 (pp. 378-387).

  • Thompson, N., Koziniec, T., & McGill, T. (2012). An open affective computing platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Networked and Embedded Systems for Every Application (pp. 1-10). Liverpool, UK.

  • Thompson, N., & McGill, T. (2015). Affective stack—a model for affective computing application development. Journal of Software, 10(8), 919–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thought Technology (2010). CardioPro Infiniti HRV analysis module user manual. http://www.thoughttechnology.com/pdf/manuals/SA7590%20CardioPro%20Infiniti%20HRV%20Analysis%20Module%20User%20Manual.pdf. Accessed 1st February 2012.

  • Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meij, H. (2013). Motivating agents in software tutorials. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 845–857. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wine, J. (1971). Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B., Burelson, W., & Arroyo, I. Emotional intelligence for computer tutors. In AIED (Ed.), 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Los Angeles, USA, 2007 (pp. 6-15).

  • Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Arroyo, I., Dragon, T., Cooper, D., & Picard, R. (2009). Affect-aware tutors: recognising and responding to student affect. International Journal of Learning Technology, 4(3), 129–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-H., Huang, Y.-M., & Hwang, J.-P. (2015). Review of affective computing in education/learning: trends and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology,. doi:10.1111/bjet.12324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannakakis, G., Hallam, J., & Lund, H. (2008). Entertainment capture through heart rate activity in physical interactive playgrounds. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(1), 207–243. doi:10.1007/s11257-007-9036-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakharov, K., Mitrovic, A., & Johnston, L. (2007). Pedagogical agents trying on a caring mentor role. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 158, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nik Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, N., McGill, T.J. Genetics with Jean: the design, development and evaluation of an affective tutoring system. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 279–299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9470-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9470-5

Keywords

Navigation