Log in

Conducting Criminological Fieldwork in China: a Guanxi Approach?

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conducting criminological fieldwork in a non-Western society remains a fascinating and mysterious enterprise. Among existing studies, very few have systematically examined the process and dynamics of conducting fieldwork in the Chinese criminal justice context. This study, based on the author’s own experiences, reflects on the key stages in such fieldwork, including obtaining access to research, interviewing and observing, and addressing ethical concerns. At its core, the study seeks to examine two key dynamics, guanxi and mianzi, focusing on how they work and the ways in which they can shape the outcomes of fieldwork. This study serves as a preliminary step in the hope that future research that endeavors to develop indigenous criminology in China will provide a proper theoretical framework and a more systematic examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. China has long been criticized by human rights organizations that the exact number of death penalty executions each year is never made public. However, a recent study by Hood and Hoyle (2014) suggests that the number is decreasing.

References

  • Bai, J. (2015). Some impact of big data on legal research [dashuju dui faxue yanjiu de xiexu yingxiang]. Peking University Law Journal, 1, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.

  • Burgess, R. G. (2000). In the field: an introduction to field research. Routledge.

  • Cao, Y. (2008). Social conflicts and modes of action in China. The China Journal, 59, 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. M. (2002). The impact of harmony on Chinese conflict management. In G. Chen & R. Ma (Eds.), Chinese conflict management and resolution (pp. 3–17). Westport, Connecticut & London: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, M. Y. (2008). Policing in the People’s Republic of China: a review of recent literature. Crime Law and Social Change, 50(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9131-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (2012). Zhongguohua: worlding China. The case of sociology and anthropology in 20th-century China. In A. Dirlik, G. Li, & H.-P. Yen (Eds.), Sociology and Anthropology in Twentieth-century China: between universalism and indigenism (pp. 1–40). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Weller, S. (2015). Ethical dilemmas around anonymity and confidentiality in longitudinal research data sharing: the case of Dan. In M. Tolich (Ed.), Qualitative Ethics in Practice. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, T., Guthrie, D., & Wank, D. (Eds.). (2004). Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture and the Changing Nature of Guanxi. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J.O.(1991). Authority without power. Oxford University Press.

  • He, N. (2014). Chinese Criminal Trials: a comprehensive empirical inquiry. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • He, X and Ng, K H. (2017). ‘It Must Be Rock Strong!’: Guanxi’s impact on Judicial Decision-Making in China (January 31, 2017). Centre for Chinese & Comparative Law Research Paper No.2017/004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2909432.

  • Heimer, M., & ThØgersen, S. (Eds.). (2006). Doing Fiedlwork in China. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. Y.-f. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 867–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2014). The death penalty: a worldwide perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, M. L., & Boateng, F. D. (2015). Perceptions of democracy and trust in the criminal justice system: a comparison between Mainland China and Taiwan. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567715570050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese psychology: confucian social relations: Springer Science + Business Media.

  • Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. London and Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, U., Yang, K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Contributions to indigenous and cultural psychology: understanding people in context. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: understanding people in context (pp. 3–26): New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

  • Lai, Y. L., Cao, L., & Zhao, J. S. (2010). The impact of political entity on confidence in legal authorities: a comparison between China and Taiwan. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 934–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2007). A cultural critique of cultural relativism. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66(1), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2006). Conducting fieldwork in China: observations on collecting primary data regarding crime, law, and the criminal justice system. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986206286918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B., & Wilson, C. (2008). A critical review of past studies on China’s corrections and recidivism. Crime Law and Social Change, 50(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9130-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, B. (2014). Leniency in Chinese criminal law. Everyday justice in Henan (Working Paper No. 14-406). Retrieved on 12 November 2016 from: http://www.berkeleyjournalofinternationallaw.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/09/Leniency-in-Chinese-Criminal-Law-Everyday-Justice-in-Henan.pdf

  • Liu, S., & Halliday, T. C. (2016). Criminal defense in China: the politics of lawyers at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., & Kelly, B. (2008). Courts and sentencing research on contemporary China. Crime, Law and Social Change, 50(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9132-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., Zhang, L., & Miethe, T. D. (2002). Interdependency, communitarianism and reintegrative shaming in China. The Social Science Journal, 2002(39), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubman, S. B. (1999). Bird in a cage: Legal reform in China after Mao. Stanford University Press.

  • Lumsden, K., & Winter, A. (2014). Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., & He. (2016). Big data analysis: a report on China judgement online [dashuju fenxi: zhongguo sifa caipan wenshu shangwang gongkai baogao]. China Law Review, 4, 195–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConville, M. (2011). Criminal Justice in China: an empirical enquiry. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., & Miller, H. V. (2015). Edge ethnography and naturalistic inquiry in criminology. In H. Copes & J. M. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Criminology (pp. 88–102). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. H., & He, X. (2014). Internal contradictions of judicial mediation in China. Law & Social Inquiry, 39(2), 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S., Huang, Y., & Wang, D. (2011). Social research on methods: quantitative and qualitative sociological studies in Chinese contexts [lun fangfa: shehuixue diaocha de bentu shijian yu shenghua]. Bei**g: Renmin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peerenboom, R. P. (1993). What's wrong with Chinese Rights: toward a theory of rights with Chinese characteristics. Harv. Hum. Rts. J., 6, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, P. B. (2004). Guanxi and the PRC Legal System: from contradiction to complementarity. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi (pp. 179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, M.W. and L.W. Pye (1985). Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Harvard University Press.

  • Song, Y. (2008). Empirical research on China’s victim-offender mediation [xingshi hejie shizheng yanjiu]. China Legal Science, 5 123–135.

  • Su, L. (1998). Power in legal sociology study: refections on a social investigation process[falv shehuixue diaocha zhong de quanli ziyuan. yige shehuixue diaocha guocheng de fansi]. Sociological Research, 1998(6), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, A. F. (1983). The social sciences and fieldwork in China: an overview. In A. F. Thurston & B. Pasternak (Eds.), The Social Sciences and Fieldwork in China: Views from the field (pp. 3–36). Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevaskes, S. (2009). Restorative justice or mcjustice with Chinese characteristics? In M. Farquhar (Ed.), 21st Century China: Views from Australia (pp. 77–96). United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevaskes, S. (2010). The shifting sands of punishment in China in the era of “Harmonious Society”. Law & Policy, 32, 332–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. (2014). Extra-legal protection in china how guanxi distorts China’s legal system and facilitates the rise of unlawful protectors. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 809–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. (2017). The Chinese Mafia: Organizd Crime, Corruption, and Extra-Legal Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2016). Organized crime and illegal gambling: how do illegal gambling enterprises respond to the challenges posed by their illegality in China? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(2), 258–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2006). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (2004). Face, norms, and instrumentality. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Laidler, K. J., & Lee, M. (2013). Doing criminological ethnography in China: opportunities and challenges. Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. M.-h. (1994). Gifts, favors, and banquets: the art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Yu, O. (2008). Corruption in China’s economic reform: a review of recent observations and explanations. Crime Law and Social Change, 50(3), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9133-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, X. (2011). Perspectives on Chinese "Face": Psychological Motives and Social Representations [zhongguoren de lianmian guan: xingshi zhuyi de xinli dongyin yu shehui biaozheng]. Bei**g: Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Messner, S., & Liu, J. (2008). A critical review of recent literature on crime and criminal justice in China: research findings, challenges, and prospects (Introduction). Crime, Law and Social Change, 50(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9134-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, L. (2009). Communities, crime and social capital in contemporary China. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuo, Y., Messner, S. F., & Zhang, L. N. (2008). Criminal victimization in contemporary China: a review of the evidence and challenges for future research. Crime Law and Social Change, 50(3), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9138-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank all of the participants in her field research. The author is also grateful for all the comments and feedback from the anonymous reviewers. Writing-up of this article is sponsored by Shanghai Pujiang Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **aoyu Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, X. Conducting Criminological Fieldwork in China: a Guanxi Approach?. Asian Criminology 13, 79–90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9259-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9259-4

Keywords

Navigation