Abstract
Militarization is crucial for the sovereignty of a nation; however, there are many environmental hazards associated with increased military spending. Previous panel studies mainly captured the short-run effects of militarization on the environment. Limited scholars determined the long-run environmental impacts of militarization but they mostly ignored possible cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity problems in panel data. Our research highlights this deeply neglected area and examines the impact of militarization on the environment in 22 OECD countries by controlling economic growth, renewable energy, and fossil fuel consumption. Drawing on an extensive dataset from 1971 to 2020, we employed advanced econometric approaches robust against endogeneity, heterogeneity, and cross-sectional dependence. The results of the cross-sectional augmented autoregressive distribute lag (CS-ARDL) analysis indicate a positive contribution of militarization to CO2 emissions implying that militarization is adding to the environmental degradation in OECD nations. This evidence proves the treadmill of destruction theory for OECD nations in the modern world. Economic growth and fossil fuels consumption increase CO2 emissions, while renewable energy mitigates emissions. Moreover, economic growth Granger causes militarization. Our results suggest that reduction in militarization level and energy conservation strategies will not hamper the economic progress of selected OECD countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data sources are referred in the paper. Data can be downloaded free of cost.
References
Adebayo TS, Odugbesan JA (2020) Modeling CO2 emissions in South Africa: empirical evidence from ARDL based bounds and wavelet coherence techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:9377–9389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11442-3
Adebayo TS, Akinsola GD, Kirikkaleli D et al (2021a) Economic performance of Indonesia amidst CO2 emissions and agriculture: a time series analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13992-6
Adebayo TS, Udemba EN, Ahmed Z, Kirikkaleli D (2021b) Determinants of consumption-based carbon emissions in Chile: an application of non-linear ARDL. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13830-9
Ahmad M, Ahmed Z, Majeed A, Huang B (2021a) An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: does institutional quality make a difference ? Environ Impact Assess Rev 89:106603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603
Ahmad M, Ahmed Z, Yang X et al (2021b) Financial development and environmental degradation: do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Ali S (2019a) Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis. Air Qual Atmos Heal 12:945–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00711-x
Ahmed Z, Wang Z, Mahmood F et al (2019b) Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:18565–18582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05224-9
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Ali S, Danish, (2020a) Linking urbanization, human capital, and the ecological footprint in G7 countries: an empirical analysis. Sustain Cities Soc 55:102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102064
Ahmed Z, Zafar MW, Mansoor S (2020b) Analyzing the linkage between military spending, economic growth, and ecological footprint in Pakistan: evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:41551–41567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10076-9
Ahmed Z, Cary M, Ali S, et al (2021a) Moving toward a green revolution in Japan : symmetric and asymmetric relationships among clean energy technology development investments, economic growth, and CO2 emissions. Energy Environ 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X211041780
Ahmed Z, Ahmad M, Rjoub H, et al (2021b) Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustain Dev 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.2251
Al-Hamdi M, Alawin M (2017) The relationship between military expenditure and economic growth in some Middle Eastern Countries: what is the story? Asian Soc Sci 13:45. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n1p45
Ali W, Abdullah A, Azam M (2017) Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Malaysia: fresh evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.236
Al-mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019
Apergis N, Payne JE (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus : evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ 34:733–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.04.007
Apergis N, Payne JE, Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69:2255–2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.014
Ben JM, Ben YS (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.049
Bildirici ME (2016a) The causal link among militarization, economic growth, CO2 emission, and energy consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4625–4636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8158-z
Bildirici ME (2016b) Defense, economic growth and energy consumption in China. Procedia Econ Financ 38:257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30197-6
Bildirici M (2017a) CO2 emissions and militarization in G7 countries: panel cointegration and trivariate causality approaches. Environ Dev Econ 22:771–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1700016X
Bildirici ME (2017b) The effects of militarization on biofuel consumption and CO2 emission. J Clean Prod 152:420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.103
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO 2 emissions : a revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: An ARDL approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138
BP (2021) Statistical Review of World Energy 2021. Available at https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/downloads.html. Accessed 11 July 2021
Bradford JH, Stoner AM (2017) The treadmill of destruction in comparative perspective: a panel study of military spending and carbon emissions, 1960–2014. J World-Systems Res 23:298–325. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2017.688
Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47:239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
Can M, Ahmed Z, Mercan M, Kalugina OA (2021) The role of trading environment-friendly goods in environmental sustainability : does green openness matter for OECD countries ? J Environ Manage 295:113038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113038
Chang T, Lee CC, Hung K, Lee KH (2014) Does military spending really matter for economic growth in China and G7 countries: the roles of dependency and heterogeneity. Def Peace Econ 25:177–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2013.763460
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econom 188:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
Clark B, Jorgenson AK (2012) The treadmill of destruction and the environmental impacts of militaries. Sociol Compass 6:557–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00474.x
Clark B, Jorgenson AK, Kentor J (2010) Militarization and energy consumption: a test of treadmill of destruction theory in comparative perspective. Int J Sociol 40:23–43. https://doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659400202
Danish ZB, Wang B, Wang Z (2017) Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Dycus S (1996) National defense and the environment. University Press of New England, Hanover
Eberhardt M (2012) Estimating panel time-series models with heterogeneous slopes. Stata J Promot Commun Stat Stata 12:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200105
Esso LJ, Keho Y (2016) Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: cointegration and causality evidence from selected African countries. Energy 114:492–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.010
Farhani S, Shahbaz M (2014) What role of renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption and output is needed to initially mitigate CO2emissions in MENA region? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.170
Gokmenoglu KK, Taspinar N, Rahman MM (2021) Military expenditure, financial development andenvironmental degradation in Turkey: a comparison of CO2emissions and ecological footprint. Int J Financ Econ 26:986–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1831
Gould KA (2007) The ecological costs of militarization. Peace Rev 19:331–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650701524873
Gould K, Pellow DN, Schnaiberg A (2008) The treadmill of production: injustice and unsustainability in the global economy. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder, CO
Hooks G, Smith CL (2004) The treadmill of destruction: national sacrifice areas and Native Americans. Am Sociol Rev 69:558–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900405
Hooks G, Smith CL (2005) Treadmills of production and destruction: threats to the environment posed by militarism. Organ Environ 18:19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026604270453
Jorgenson AK, Clark B (2009) The economy, military, and ecologically unequal exchange relationships in comparative perspective: a panel study of the ecological footprints of nations, 1975–2000. Society 56:1975–2000. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.621.622
IEA (2017) CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2017 - Highlights. Int Energy Agency 1:1–162. https://doi.org/10.1787/co2_fuel-2017-en. Accessed 7 March 2021
IEA (2020) CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2020: Highlights. https://webstore.iea.org/co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-2020-highlights. Accessed Jan 2021
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Isiksal AZ (2021) Testing the effect of sustainable energy and military expenses on environmental degradation: evidence from the states with the highest military expenses. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:20487–20498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11735-7
Jorgenson AK, Clark B, Kentor J (2000) Militarization and the environment: a panel study of carbon dioxide emissions and the ecological footprints of nations, 1970–2000. Glob Environ Polit 10:7–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.1.7
Kanat O, Yan Z, Asghar MM, et al (2021) Do natural gas, oil, and coal consumption ameliorate environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Russia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15989-7
Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022
Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.025
Korkmaz S (2015) The effect of military spending on economic growth and unemployment in Mediterranean countries. Int J Econ Financ Issues 5:273–280
Kreft S, Eckstein D, Dorsch L, Fischer L (2016) Global climate risk index 2016: who suffers most from extreme weather events? weather-related loss events in 2014 and 1995 to 2014. Germanwatch Nord-Süd Initiative eV
Li J, Zhao Y, Zhang A et al (2021) Effect of grazing exclusion on nitrous oxide emissions during freeze-thaw cycles in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 307:107217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107217
Meo M, Nathaniel S, Shaikh G, Kumar A (2020) Energy consumption, institutional quality and tourist arrival in Pakistan: is the nexus (a)symmetric amidst structural breaks? J Public Aff 1–11https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2213
Mert M (2014) Fossil & renewable energy consumption , GHGs ( greenhouse gases ) and economic growth : evidence from a panel of EU ( European Union ) countries. 74:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.07.008
Murshed M (2020) Revisiting the deforestation-induced EKC hypothesis: the role of democracy in Bangladesh GeoJournal 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10234-z
Murshed M, Ahmed Z, Alam MS, et al (2021a) Reinvigorating the role of clean energy transition for achieving a low-carbon economy: evidence from Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–22
Murshed M, Rahman MA, Alam MS et al (2021b) The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z
Murshed M, Ahmed R, Kumpamool C, et al (2021c) The effects of regional trade integration and renewable energy transition on environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian neighbors. Bus Strateg Environ. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2862
Nathaniel SP, Iheonu CO (2019) Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Sci Total Environ 679:337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.011
Nathaniel SP, Bekun FV (2020) Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: The Nigerian experience J Public Aff 20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2037
Nathaniel S, Khan SAR (2020) The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 272:122709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709
Nathaniel S, Nwodo O, Sharma G et al (2020) Renewable energy, urbanization, and ecological footprint linkage in CIVETS. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:19616–19629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08466-0
Parenti C (2011) Tropic of chaos : climate change and the new geography of violence. Perseus Books, New York
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econom 47:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae
Pesaran H, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142:50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Phillips PCB, Sul D (2003) Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence*. Econom J 6:217–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/1368-423X.00108
Polsterer F (2015) The impacts of militarism on climate change: a sorely neglected relationship : the effects on human rights and how a civil society approach can bring about system change. 20.500.11825/325
Qayyum U, Anjum S, Sabir S (2021) Armed conflict, militarization and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from South Asia. J Clean Prod 281:125299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125299
Qin L, Raheem S, Murshed M, et al (2021) Does financial inclusion limit carbon dioxide emissions? Analyzing the role of globalization and renewable electricity output. Sustain Dev
Saboori B, Sapri M, Baba M (2014) Economic growth , energy consumption and CO 2 emissions in OECD ( Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ) ’ s transport sector : a fully modi fi ed bi-directional relationship approach. Energy 66:150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.048
Salim RA, Rafiq S (2012) Why do some emerging economies proactively accelerate the adoption of renewable energy? Energy Econ 34:1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.015
Sanders B (2009) The green zone: the environmental costs of militarism. AK Press, Oakland, CA
Schnaiberg A, Gould KA (1994) Environment and society : the enduring conflict. St. Martin’s, New York
Sharif A, Baris-Tuzemen O, Uzuner G et al (2020) Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustain Cities Soc 57:102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138
Shaw M (1988) Dialectics of war : an essay in the social theory of total war and peace. Pluto Press
Solarin SA, Al-mulali U, Ozturk I (2018) Determinants of pollution and the role of the military sector : evidence from a maximum likelihood approach with two structural breaks in the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:30949–30961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3060-5
SPIRI (2020) SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex. Accessed 17 April 2021
SPIRI (2021) SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. Available at https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex. Accessed 12 July 2021
Ullah S, Andlib Z, Majeed MT et al (2021) Asymmetric effects of militarization on economic growth and environmental degradation: fresh evidence from Pakistan and India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:9484–9497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11142-y
WDI (2020) World Devleopment Indicators (WDI), Available at https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/. Accessed 17 June 2021
Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J Appl Econom 23:193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.967
Wu B, Fang H , Jacoby G, et al (2021) Environmental regulations and innovation for sustainability? Moderating effect of political connections Emerg Mark Rev 100835https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100835
Xue L, Haseeb M, Mahmood H et al (2021) Renewable energy use and ecological footprints mitigation: evidence from selected South Asian economies. Sustainability 13:1613
Yu** L, Ramzan M, **ncheng L et al (2021) Determinants of carbon emissions in Argentina: the roles of renewable energy consumption and globalization. Energy Rep 7:4747–4760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.065
Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Sinha A et al (2020) How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries. J Clean Prod 268:122149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122149
Zhao F, Song L, Peng Z et al (2021) Night-time light remote sensing map**: construction and analysis of Ethnic Minority Development Index. Remote Sens 13:2129. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112129
Funding
This research work is funded by ILMA University under the ILMA Research Publication Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZA: Writing original manuscript, conceptualization, writing reviewing and editing, data curation, empirical analysis MA: Writing original manuscript: data curation; empirical analysis; visualization MM: Writing reviewing and editing AV: Writing original manuscript; data collection. DK: Comments; review; validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Murshed, M. et al. The trade-off between energy consumption, economic growth, militarization, and CO2 emissions: does the treadmill of destruction exist in the modern world?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 18063–18076 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17068-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17068-3