Log in

Does financial development cause environmental pollution? Empirical evidence from South Asia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the influence of financial development (FD) on CO2 emissions in five South Asian economies including energy consumption (ENC) and per capita income (PCI) as control variables. Using annual panel data for the period 1980–2018, this study applies the second-generation unit root and cointegration tests, panel pooled generalized least square (GLS) estimate, pooled mean group (PMG) estimation, and Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality test to accomplish the study. Westerlund cointegration test confirms a long-run relationship among the variables. The GLS estimation results reveal that FD, ENC, and PCI have significant impacts on environmental pollution. The relationship between FD and CO2 emissions is linear, and thus, FD causes environmental pollution positively; an increasing level of FD does not reduce the latter. PCI and ENC affect environmental quality negatively. However, the existence of the EKC hypothesis is validated, as, at a rising level of PCI, pollution starts declining, taking an inverse U-shape. The PMG estimators also provide similar outcomes and validate the robustness of the panel GLS estimation. The D-H causality test supports the GSL findings and further reveals a feedback relationship between PCI and CO2 emissions, ENC causes CO2 emissions, bidirectional causality exists between FD and ENC, PCI causes both ENC and FD, and CO2 emissions cause FD. The outcomes have implications for the policymakers to encourage firms and stakeholders to invest in renewable energy projects, and the financial intermediaries to the extent and subsidize loans for such investment projects. This is likely to induce investments in renewable energy sources, which will boost the energy portfolios, reduce CO2 emissions, and produce a moderately cleaner environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is taken from the following two websites: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators# and https://data.imf.org/?sk=f8032e80-b36c-43b1-ac26-493c5b1cd33b.

Notes

  1. The eight countries of SAARC include Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

  2. FD index is a composite index of countries’ comparative ranking on the depth, access, and efficiency of their financial institutions and financial markets.

References

  • Abbasi F, Riaz K (2016) CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90:102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acaravci A, Ozturk I (2010) On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Europe. Energy 35:5412–5420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Raza MY (2020) Does financial development and foreign direct investment improve environmental quality? Evidence from belt and road countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:23586–23601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08748-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Acheampong AO (2019) Modelling for insight: does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Econ 83:156–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armeanu D, Vintilă G, Andrei JV, Gherghina SC, Drăgoi MC, Teodor C (2018) Exploring the link between environmental pollution and economic growth in EU-28 countries: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? PLoS One 13(5):e0195708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aruga K (2019) Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for the Asia-Pacific Region. Sustainability 11:2395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyene SD, Kotosz B (2020) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: an empirical study for East African countries. Int J Environ Stud 77(4):636–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT (2020) Transmission channels between financial development and CO2 emissions: a global perspective. Heliyon 6:e05509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05509

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haas, Ralph and Alexander, Popov (2018) Financial development and industrial pollution. European Banking Center Discussion Paper Series, 2018-001. SSRN, Tilburg, The Netherlands

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Working Paper 3914, National Bureau of Economic, Cambridge

  • Harbaugh WT, Levison A, Wilson DM (2002) Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Rev Econ Stat 84(3):541–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huangfu Z, Hu H, **e N, Zhu Y-Q, Hao Chen H, Wang Y (2020) The heterogeneous influence of economic growth on environmental pollution: evidence from municipal data of China. Pet Sci 17:1180–1193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS (2021) Influence of economic growth on environmental pollution in South Asia: a panel cointegration analysis. Asia-Pac J Reg Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-021-00208-5

  • Islam MS (2020) Human capital and per capita income linkage in South Asia: a heterogeneous dynamic panel analysis. J Knowl Econ 11(4):1614–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS, Ali BMA (2011) Energy consumption and economic development in Bangladesh: an empirical study. Asia-Pac J Soc Sci 2(December)

  • IMF (2021). Financial Development Index. https://data.imf.org/?sk=f8032e80-b36c-43b1-ac26-493c5b1cd33b

  • Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy, and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ 33:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54(54):406–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang M, Kim E, Woo Y (2020) The relationship between economic growth and air pollution—a regional comparison between China and South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:2761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korhan KG, Nigar T (2018) Testing the agriculture-induced EKC hypothesis: the case of Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(4):22829–22841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2330-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 49:l–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lean HH, Smyth R (2010) CO2 emissions, electricity consumption, and output in ASEAN. Appl Energy 87(6):1858–1864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Zhang J, Ma Y (2015) Financial development, environmental quality, and economic growth. Sustainability 7:9395–9416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manuel AZM, Ivanna VB, Joseph AB, María MJ (2016) Relationship between economic growth and environmental degradation: is there an environmental evidence of Kuznets curve for Brazil? Int J Energy Econ Policy 6(2):208–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques LM, Fuinhas JA, Marques AC (2016) On the global energy consumption and economic growth nexus: a long time span analysis. Int Energy J 15(4):143–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Omri A, Daly S, Rault C, Chaibi A (2015) Financial development, environmental quality, trade, and economic growth: what causes what in Mena countries. Energy Econ 48:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozokcu S, Ozdemir O (2017) Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1993) Empirical test and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (Working Paper, p 238). Technology and employment program, International Labor Office, Geneva

  • Peng S, Bao Q (2006) Economic growth and environmental pollution: an empirical test for the environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in China. Research on Financial and Economic Issues 8:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RP (1999) Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):621–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross-section dependence in panels. (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240)

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Smith V, & Yamagata T (2009) Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure. (Cambridge University, unpublished working paper, September)

  • Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econ Rev 34(6-10):1089–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion M, Heil M, Jalan J (2000) Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxf Econ Pap 52(4):651–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: a cointegration approach. Energy 55:813–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2010) The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38(5):2528–2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1993) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 34:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013a) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption, and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013b) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade, and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S (1992) Economic Growth and Environmental Quality. Working paper, World Development Report, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Soytas U, Sari R, Ewing BT (2007) 'Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62:482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DL (2003) The Environmental Kuznets Curve. Unpublished manuscript, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial, and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolde-Rufael Y (2005) Energy demand and economic growth: the African experience. J Policy Model 27(8):891–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2020) The World Development Indicators, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators#

  • Yuxiang K, Chen Z (2011) Financial development and environmental performance: evidence from China. Environ Dev Econ 16:93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YJ (2011) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39(4):2197–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S (2018) Is trade openness good for the environment in South Korea? The role of non-fossil electricity consumption. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13

  • Zhao J, Zhao Z, Zhang H (2021) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on environmental pollution in China: new evidence from a spatial econometric analysis. Energy Econ 93:104506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilio M, Recalde M (2011) GDP and environment pressure: the role of energy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy Policy 39(12):7941–7949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoundi Z (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy, and the environmental Kuznets curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1067–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author contributes the whole.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Saiful Islam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, M.S. Does financial development cause environmental pollution? Empirical evidence from South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 4350–4362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16005-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16005-8

Keywords

Navigation