Abstract
We evaluated the effectiveness of natural organic surfactants such as humic acids (HA) from lignite to simultaneously wash heavy metals (HM) and polychlorobiphenyls (PCB) from a heavily contaminated industrial soil of northern Italy. Supramolecular HA promote in solution a micelle-like structure, where recalcitrant apolar organic xenobiotics are repartitioned from surfaces of soil particles during soil washing process. Concomitantly, the HA acidic functional groups enable a simultaneous complexation of HM. A single soil washing with HA removed 68 and 75% of PCB congeners for 1:1 and 10:1 solution/soil ratios, respectively. The same HA washing simultaneously and efficiently removed a cumulative average of 47% of total HM, with a maximum of 57 and 67% for Hg and Cu, respectively. We showed that washing a highly polluted soil with HA solution not only is an effective and rapid soil remediation technique but also simultaneously removes both HM and persistent organic pollutants (POP). Soil washing by humic biosurfactants is also a sustainable and eco-friendly technology, since, contrary to synthetic surfactants and solvents used in conventional washing techniques, it preserves soil biodiversity, promotes natural attenuation of unextracted POP, and accelerates further soil reclamation techniques such as bio- or phytoremediation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Malfunctioning of industrial activities often causes contamination of soils and waters by toxic and persistent organic pollutants (POP), such as polychlorobiphenyls (PCB) and/or heavy metals (HM). PCB are among the most hazardous pollutants (Borja et al. 2005), and, as highly hydrophobic contaminants, are adsorbed in soils on surfaces of clay and other oxides and on organic matter (Wang et al. 2005; Sannino et al. 2013).
The soil washing of PCB by HA solutions may result not only more efficient but also much faster than the bioremediation processes. In fact, although microorganism by anaerobic and aerobic treatments have been used to promote PCB biodegradation in soil, this process is not only time consuming but also poorly efficient as it depends on several chemical and environmental factors (Furukawa and Fujihara 2008) such as nutrients availability, temperature, pH (Borja et al. 2005; Wiegel and Wu 2000), and type of bacteria (Sannino et al. 2016). Moreover, aerobic microorganisms degrade prevalently lower chlorinated PCB congeners while anaerobic microbes are known to transform highly and ortho-chlorinated PCB (Adebusoye et al. 2008; De et al. 2006). In addition, in many cases PCB dechlorination occurs only after a lag period that varies from few days to several months and is also liable to generate in the process further toxic by-products (Wiegel and Wu 2000; Chen et al. 2001).
Similarly, the soil washings with humic surfactants appear much more efficient than the phytoremediation progressively called upon to reclaim polluted soils, since not only the latter method explores a very thin soil depth but also its contribution to the microbial degradation of PCB is extremely slow (Van Aken et al. 2010; **g et al. 2018). In fact, it has been estimated that the phytoremediation of an industrial soil contaminated by relatively biolabile PCB, such as tri- and tetra-CB congeners, would take more than 20 years to be completed (Schwitzguébel 2017). Conversely, this work has shown that a single and rapid washing with HA solutions at a L/S ratio of 10:1 was equally effective in removing either low- or high-chlorinated PCB congeners and either planar or no planar PCB. In fact, our findings do not reveal any relation between number and position of chlorine atoms and amount of PCB removed from soil, thereby indicating that the soil decontamination by HA washing is substantially independent on type of PCB congeners.
Conclusions
Soil washing by solutions of humic surfactants can be a promising technology for rapid, efficient, and simultaneous remediation of soils contaminated by both heavy metals and very recalcitrant pollutants, such as PCB. In fact, the HA washing removed from soil an average of 47% of all HM, with a peak of 57 and 67% for highly toxic metals such as Hg and Cu. The much larger efficiency of HA than water alone in removing HM from soil is due to the considerable chelating capacity of the heterogeneous acidic functional groups present in the humic molecules.
Concomitantly, the HA surfactant property leads to formation of pseudo-micellar domains when the supramolecular structure of humic matter is arranged in aqueous solutions, and favors the repartition of highly hydrophobic pollutants like PCB from the soil surfaces into the humic pseudo-micelles. In fact, the same soil washing experiment that efficiently removed HM, also enabled the removal of up to 75% of the total PCB present in the industrially polluted soil that was investigated here.
We thus believe that the use of natural humic surfactants represents an efficient, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective alternative to common methods for soil remediation and may well replace commercial synthetic surfactants in soil washing technologies. In fact, a washing procedure based on humic solutions can be applied to remove simultaneously from soils large amounts of both heavy metals and recalcitrant organic compounds and the resulting contaminated HA easily disposed by an ex situ incineration. Moreover, the washing by humic surfactants would leave behind in soil enough metabolic carbon to speed up the natural attenuation of the organic pollutants remaining in soil.
References
Adebusoye SA, Picardal FW, Ilori MO, Amund OO, Fuqua C (2008) Characterization of multiple novel aerobic polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-utilizing bacterial strains indigenous to contaminated tropical African soils. Biodegradation 19:145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-007-9122-x
Bianchi V, Masciandaro G, Giraldi D, Ceccanti B, Iannelli R (2008) Enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction from marine dredged sediments comparing conventional chelating agents (citric acid and EDTA) with humic substances. Water Air Soil Pollut 193:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9693-0
Borja J, Taleon DM, Auresenia J, Gallardo S (2005) Polychlorinated biphenyls and their biodegradation. Process Biochem 40:1999–2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.08.006
Chandler D (2005) Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437:640–647. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04162
Chen IM, Chang FC, Hsu MF, Wang YS (2001) Comparisons of PCBs dechlorination occurrences in various contaminated sediments. Chemosphere 43:649–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00417-3
Chilom G, Bruns AS, Rice JA (2009) Aggregation of humic acid in solution: contributions of different fractions. Org Geochem 40:455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.01.010
Conte P, Agretto A, Spaccini R, Piccolo A (2005) Soil remediation: humic acids as natural surfactants in the washings of highly contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 135:515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.10.006
Cozzolino V, de Martino A, Nebbioso A, Di Meo V, Salluzzo A, Piccolo A (2016) Plant tolerance to mercury in a contaminated soil is enhanced by the combined effects of humic matter addition and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Environ Sci Pollut Res 64:3538–3545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6337-6
D. Lgs 152 (2006) Title V-appendix 5-Table 1A and B. Rome, Italy
De J, Ramaiah N, Sarkar A (2006) Aerobic degradation of highly chlorinated polychlorobiphenyls by a marine bacterium, Pseudomonas CHo7. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1321–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-006-9179-4
Di Guardo A, Terzaghi E, Raspa G, Borin S, Mapelli F, Chouaia B, Zanardini E, Morosini C, Colombo A, Fattore E, Davoli E, Armiraglio S, Sale VM, Anelli S, Nastasio P (2017) Differentiating current and past PCB and PCDD/F sources: the role of a large contaminated soil site in an industrialized city area. Environ Pollut 223:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.033
Dussault M, Bécaert V, François M, Sauvé S, Deschênes L (2008) Effect of copper on soil functional stability measured by relative soil stability index (RSSI) based on two enzyme activities. Chemosphere 72:755–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.03.019
EPA Method 1668C (2010) https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/method_1668c_2010.pdf
Fava F, Piccolo A (2002) Effects of humic substances on the bioavailability and aerobic biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls in a model soil. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:204–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10140
Fava F, Berselli S, Conte P, Piccolo A, Marchetti L (2004) Effects of humic substances and soya lecithin on the aerobic bioremediation of a soil historically contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Biotechnol Bioeng 88:214–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20225
Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R (2008) Microbial transformation and degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ Pollut 155:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.10.016
Focht DD, Reineke W (2002) Biotransformations of polychlorinated biphenyls. In: Hurst CJ, Knudson GR, McInerney MJ, Stezenbach LD, Walter MV (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology, second edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 1028–1037
Furukawa K, Fujihara H (2008) Microbial degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls: biochemical and molecular features. J Biosci Bioeng 105:433–449. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.105.433
Garau G, Castaldi P, Santona L, Deiana P, Melis P (2007) Influence of red mud, zeolite and lime on heavy metal immobilization, culturable heterotrophic microbial populations and enzyme activities in a contaminated soil. Geoderma 142:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.011
Garcia-Mina J-M (2006) Stability, solubility and maximum metal binding capacity in metal–humic complexes involving humic substances extracted from peat and organic compost. Org Geochem 37:1960–1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2006.07.027
Guetzloff TF, Rice JA (1994) Does humic acid form a micelle? Sci Total Environ 152:31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(94)90548-7
Halim M, Conte P, Piccolo A (2003) Potential availability of heavy metals to phytoextraction from contaminated soils induced by exogenous humic substances. Chemosphere 37:255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00185-1
Irving HMNH, Williams RJP (1953) The stability of transition-metal complexes. J Chem Soc 637:3192e3210. https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9530003192
Jean L, Bordas F, Bollinger JC (2007) Chromium and nickel mobilization from a contaminated soil using chelants. Environ Pollut 147:729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.09.003
Jensen JK, Holm PE, Nejrup J, Borggaard OK (2011) A laboratory assessment of potentials and limitations of using EDTA, rhamnolipids, and compost-derived humic substances (HS) in enhanced phytoextraction of copper and zinc polluted calcareous soils. Soil Sediment Contam 20:777–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2011.609198
**g R, Fusi S, Kjellerup BV (2018) Remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in contaminated soils and sediment: state of knowledge and perspectives. Front Environ Sci 6:79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00079
Kulikowska D, Gusiatin ZM, Bułkowska K, Kierklo K (2015) Humic substances from sewage sludge compost as washing agent effectively remove Cu and Cd from soil. Chemosphere 136:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.083
Lászlová K, Dudášová H, Olejníková P, Horváthová G, Velická Z, Horváthová H, Dercová K (2018) The application of biosurfactants in bioremediation of the aged sediment contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls. Water Air Soil Pollut 229:219–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.083
Lipczynska-Kochany E (2018) Humic substances, their microbial interactions and effects on biological transformations of organic pollutants in water and soil: a review. Chemosphere 202:420–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.104
Mackova M, Barriault D, Francova K, Sylvestre M, Moder M, Vrchotova B, Lovecka P, Najmanova J, Demnerova K, Novakova M, Rezek J, Macek T (2006) Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls. In: Mackova M et al (eds) Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation. Springer, Heidelberg
Mao X, Jiang R, **ao W, Yu J (2015) Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review. J Hazard Mater 285:419–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009
Mauclair C, Layshock J, Carpi A (2008) Quantifying the effect of humic matter on the emission of mercury from artificial soil surfaces. Appl Geochem 23:594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.017
Meng F, Yuan G, Wei J, Bi D, Sik Ok Y, Wang H (2017) Humic substances as a washing agent for Cd-contaminated soils. Chemosphere 181:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.127
Nebbioso A, Piccolo A, Lamshoft M, Spiteller M (2014) Molecular characterization of an end-residue of humeomics applied to a soil humic acid. RSC Adv 4:23658–23665. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA01619J
Pacwa-Płociniczak M, Płaza GA, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Cameotra SS (2011) Environmental applications of biosurfactants: recent advances. Int J Mol Sci 12:633–654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12010633
Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY (2010) Phytoavailability and fractionation of lead and manganese in a contaminated soil after application of three amendments. Bioresour Technol 101:5667–5676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.149
Piccolo A (1988) Characteristics of soil humic substances extracted with some organic and inorganic solvents and purified by the HCl-HF treatment. Soil Sci 146:418–426
Piccolo A (2002) The Supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil. Science Adv Agron 75:57–134
Piccolo A (2016) In memoriam Prof. F.J. Stevenson and the Question of humic substances in soil. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 3:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0076
Piccolo A, Spaccini R, Drosos M, Vinci G, Cozzolino V (2018) The Molecular Composition of humus carbon: recalcitrance and reactivity in soils. In: Garcia C, Nannipieri P, Hernandez T (eds) The Future of Soil Carbon. Its Conservation and Formation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–124
Piccolo A, Spaccini R, De Martino A, Scognamiglio F, di Meo V (2019a) Soil washing with solutions of humic substances from manure compost removes heavy metal contaminants as a function of humic molecular composition. Chemosphere 225:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.019
Piccolo A, Spaccini R, Savy D, Drosos M, Cozzolino V (2019b) The soil humeome: chemical structure, functions and technological perspectives. In: Vaz S Jr (ed) Sustainable agrochemistry: a compendium of technologies. Springer Nature, Heidelberg, pp 183–222
Rao CRM, Sahuquillo A, Lopez Sanchez JF (2007) A review of the different methods applied in environmental geochemistry for single and sequential extraction of trace elements in soils and related materials. Water Air Soil Pollut 189:291–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9564-0
Rasmussen SB, Jensen JK, Borggaard OK (2015) A laboratory test of NOM-assisted remediation of arsenic and copper contaminated soils. J Environ Chem Eng 3:3020–3023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.04.029
Sannino F, Spaccini R, Savy D, Piccolo A (2013) Remediation of highly contaminated soils from an industrial site by employing a combined treatment with exogeneous humic substances and oxidative biomimetic catalysis. J Hazard Mater 261:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.077
Sannino F, Nuzzo A, Ventorino V, Olimpia Pepe O, Piccolo A (2016) Effective degradation of organic pollutants in aqueous media by microbial strains isolated from soil of a contaminated industrial site. Chem Biol Technol Agric 3:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-016-0052-x
Schmidt CK, Brauch HJ (2004) Impact of aminopolycarboxylates on aquatic organisms and eutrophication: overview of available data. Environ Toxicol 19:620–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20071
Schwitzguébel J-P (2017) Phytoremediation of soils contaminated by organic compounds: hype, hope and facts. J Soils Sediments 17:1492–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1253-9
Shaker MA, Albishri HM (2014) Dynamics and thermodynamics of toxic metals adsorption onto soil-extracted humic acid. Chemosphere 111:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.088
Smejkalova D, Piccolo A (2008) Aggregation and disaggregation of humic supramolecular assemblies by NMR diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY-NMR). Environ Sci Technol 42:699–706. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071828p
Smejkalova D, Spaccini R, Fontaine B, Piccolo A (2009) Binding of phenol and differently halogenated phenols to dissolved humic matter as measured by NMR spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 43:5377–5382. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900559b
Spaccini R, Piccolo A, Conte P, Haberauer G, Gerzabek MH (2002) Increased soil organic carbon sequestration through hydrophobic protection by humic substances. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1839–1851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00197-9
Tombácz E (1999) Colloidal properties of humic acids and spontaneous changes of their colloidal state under variable solution conditions. Soil Sci 164:814–824
Trellu C, Mousset E, Pechaud Y, Huguenot D, van Hullebusch ED, Esposito G, Oturan MA (2016) Removal of hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil washing/flushing solutions: A critical review. J Hazard Mater 306:149–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.008
Tsang DCW, Hartley NR (2014) Metal distribution and spectroscopic analysis after soil washing with chelating agents and humic substances. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:3987–3995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2300-y
Van Aken B, Correa PA, Schnoor JL (2010) Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls: new trends and promises. Environ Sci Technol 44:2767–2776. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902514d
Vasilyeva GK, Strijakova ER (2007) Bioremediation of soils and sediments contaminated by polychlorinated biphenyls. Microbiology 76:639–653. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002626170706001X
Wang S, Mulligan CN (2009) Enhanced mobilization of arsenic and heavy metals from mine tailings by humic acid. Chemosphere 74:274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.040
Wang X, Lu J, Xu M, **ng B (2008) Sorption of pyrene by regular and nanoscaled metal oxide particles: influence of adsorbed organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 42:7267–7272. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8015414
Wang G, Pan X, Zhang S, Zhong Q, Zhou W, Zhang X, Wu J, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJGM (2020) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil by biodegradable chelator–induced washing: efficiencies and mechanisms. Environ Res 186:109554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109554
Warwick P, Inam E, Evans N (2005) Arsenics interaction with humic acid. Environ Chem 2:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN05025
Wells MJM (2019) Supramolecular answers to the organic matter controversy. J Environ Qual 48:1644–1651. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2019.02.0089
Wiegel J, Wu Q (2000) Microbial reductive dehalogenation of polychlorinated biphenyls. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 32:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00693.x
Ying GG (2006) Fate, behaviour and effect of surfactants and their degradation products in the environment. Environ Int 32:417–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.07.004
Zhang W, Tsang DCW, Lo IMC (2007) Removal of Pb and MDF from contaminated soils by EDTA- and SDS-enhanced washing. Chemosphere 66:2025–2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.10.017
Funding
Open Access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AP, RR, and RS designed the experiment; ADM and FS conducted the experiment and did the laboratory measurements; AP and RR analyzed the data; AP and RS wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
All authors listed have contributed significantly to the work and agree to be in the author list.
Consent for publication
All authors agree to publish the work.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Piccolo, A., De Martino, A., Scognamiglio, F. et al. Efficient simultaneous removal of heavy metals and polychlorobiphenyls from a polluted industrial site by washing the soil with natural humic surfactants. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 25748–25757 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12484-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12484-x