SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of economic growth, financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on the ecological footprint of BRICS countries for the period 1996–2016 in the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC). In the research phases, the effects of financial openness and trade openness on ecological footprint were examined both individually and as a whole using three models. The results indicate that the EKC hypothesis is not valid in all BRICS countries. Specifically, the individual results demonstrate that the EKC model using financial openness is valid only for India, while the EKC model using trade openness is valid both for India and South Africa. Furthermore, financial openness has reduced environmental pollution in India and South Africa. Trade openness has reduced environmental pollution in China and India, while it has increased in South Africa. Lastly, energy intensity has increased environmental pollution in all countries except Russia for both models. Overall, policy-makers should develop policies to reduce energy intensity in BRICS countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdouli M, Kamoun O, Hamdi B (2018) The impact of economic growth, population density, and FDI inflows on CO2 emissions in BRICST countries: Does the Kuznets curve exist?. Empirical Economics, 54(4):1717–1742

  • Ahmad N, Du L, Lu J, Wang J, Li HZ, Hashmi MZ (2017) Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy 123:164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K (2017) Revisiting the role of financial development for energy-growth-trade nexus in BRICS economies. Energy 128:487–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed K, Long W (2013) An empirical analysis of CO2 emission in Pakistan using EKC hypothesis. J Int Trade Law Policy 12(2):188–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed Z, Wang Z (2019) Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(26):26782–26796

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic 70:477–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Weng-Wai C, Sheau-Ting L, Mohammed AH (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecol Indic 48:315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Aung TS, Saboori B, Rasoulinezhad E (2017) Economic growth and environmental pollution in Myanmar: an analysis of environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(25):20487–20501

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baek J, Kim HS (2013) Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea. Energy Econ 36:744–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass A, Burakov D, Freidin M (2019) Does financial development matter for environmental Kuznets curve in Russia? Evidence from the Autoregressive Distributed Lag Bounds Test Approach. Int J Energy Econ Policy 9(4):334–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:587–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • BRICS **amen (n.d.) http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/170904-xiamen.html. Accessed 12 4 2020

  • Cetin M, Ecevit E, Yucel AG (2018) The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(36):36589–36603

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty D, Mandal SK (2016) Estimating the relationship between economic growth and environmental quality for the BRICS economies-a dynamic panel data approach. The Journal of Develo** Areas 50(5):119–130

  • Chinn MD, Ito H (2006) What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81(1):163–192

  • Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish R, Ulucak, Khan S (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávalos J (2016) Sustainable economic growth: an empirical study for the Asia-Pacific economic cooperation forum. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6(3):594–601

    Google Scholar 

  • DECLARATION, BRICS Leaders **amen. **amen (China), September 4, 2017.

  • Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Sinha A (2020) Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. J Clean Prod 242:118537

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 30(6):1065–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt M, Teal F (2010) Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production, Economics Series Working Papers, 515, University of Oxford, Department of Economics

  • Fakher HA (2019) Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index). Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(10):10276–10291

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farhani S, Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO 2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(20):15663–15676

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S (2010) Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy 38(6):3008–3014

    Google Scholar 

  • Global outlook (2019) http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/308981560187921635/211398-Ch01.pdf GLOBAL OUTLOOK JUNE 2019. Accessed 12 4 2020

  • Gormus S, Aydin M (2020) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: new evidence from the top 10 innovative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:27904–27913

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorus MS, Aydin M (2019) The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emission in MENA countries: causality analysis in the frequency domain. Energy 168:815–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2016), Ministry of Finance Economic Survey 2015-2016 Volume II https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget2016-2017/es2015-16/echapvol2-08.pdf. Accessed 12 4 2020

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). Nat Bureau Econ Res. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

  • Gulistan A, Tariq YB, Bashir MF (2020) Dynamic relationship among economic growth, energy, trade openness, tourism, and environmental degradation: fresh global evidence. Environ Sci Pollut 27:13477–13487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07875-5

  • Hanif I (2018) Impact of economic growth, nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, and urbanization on carbon emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(15):15057–15067

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haseeb A, **a E, Baloch MA, Abbas K (2018) Financial development, globalization, and CO 2 emission in the presence of EKC: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(31):31283–31296

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hervieux MS, Darné O (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve and ecological footprint: a time series analysis. Econ Bull 35(1):814–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalil A, Feridun M (2011) The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Economics 33(2):284–291

  • Javid M, Sharif F (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:406–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang YQ, Zhao T, Yang YY (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in China: a spatial panel data approach. Ecol Indic 63:231–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak SI, Ahmad M, Khan ZU, Khan A (2020) Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:13866–13881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4

  • Koengkan M, Fuinhas JA, Marques AC (2018) Does financial openness increase environmental degradation? Fresh evidence from MERCOSUR countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(30):30508–30516

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Law SH (2009) Trade openness, capital flows and financial development in develo** economies. Int Econ J 23(3):409–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Omoju OE, Nwakeze NM, Okonkwo JU, Megbowon ET (2016) Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis a sound basis for environmental policy in Africa? J Clean Prod 133:712–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y et al (2017) Assessment of impacts of Hubei Pilot emission trading schemes in China—a CGE-analysis using TermCO2 model. Appl Energy 189:762e769

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed ASM, Guo P, Haq IU, Pan G, Khan A (2019) Do government expenditure and financial development impede environmental degradation in Venezuela? Plos One 14(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosa IA (2017) The econometrics of the environmental Kuznets curve: an illustration using Australian CO2 emissions. Appl Econ 49(49):4927–4945

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrabet Z, Alsamara M (2017) Testing the Kuznets curve hypothesis for Qatar: a comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1366–1375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • New Development Bank (2018) Develo** solutions for a sustainable future annual report 2017. https://www.ndb.int/wpcontent/uploads/2018/07/NDB_AR2017.pdf. Accessed 12 4 2020

  • OECD (2011), OECD GREEN GROWTH STUDIES available at: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/greening-energy/49157219.pdf

  • Ozcan B, Apergis N, Shahbaz M (2018) A revisit of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey: new evidence from bootstrap rolling window causality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(32):32381–32394

    Google Scholar 

  • Özokcu S, Özdemir Ö (2017) Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:639–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I (2015) Sustainability in the food-energy-water nexus: evidence from BRICS (Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China, and South Africa) countries. Energy 93:999–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK, Aydin M (2020) Testing the EKC hypothesis for the top six hydropower energy-consuming countries: evidence from Fourier Bootstrap ARDL procedure. J. Clean. Prod 264, 121699

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240

  • Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74(4):967–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142(1):50–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafique MZ, Li Y, Larik AR, Monaheng MP (2020) The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27:23899–23913

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman HU, Ghazali A, Bhatti GA, Khan SU (2020) Role of economic growth, financial development, trade, energy and FDI in environmental Kuznets curve for Lithuania: evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Eng Econ 31(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasoulinezhad E, Saboori B (2018) Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO 2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(18):17354–17370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raza SA, Shah N, Khan KA (2020) Residential energy environmental Kuznets curve in emerging economies: the role of economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and financial development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(5):5620–5629

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saidi K, Rahman MM, Amamri M (2017) The causal nexus between economic growth and energy consumption: new evidence from global panel of 53 countries. Sustain Cities Soc 33:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Ozturk I (2020) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Kenya: a multivariate analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 117:109481

    Google Scholar 

  • Seetanah B, Sannassee RV, Fauzel S, Soobaruth Y, Giudici G, Nguyen APH (2019) Impact of economic and financial development on environmental degradation: evidence from small island develo** states (SIDS). Emerg Mark Financ Trade 55(2):308–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafiei S, Salim RA (2014) Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 66:547–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 50:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Haouas I, Van Hoang TH (2019) Economic growth and environmental degradation in Vietnam: is the environmental Kuznets curve a complete picture? Emerg Mark Rev 38:197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy PA (1970) Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38(2):311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustain Cities Soc 54:101996

    Google Scholar 

  • Ummalla M, Goyari P (2020) The impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth and CO2 emissions in BRICS countries: does the environmental Kuznets curve exist? J Public Aff. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2126

  • UNFCC (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, October 2015.

  • Wang Y, Kang L, Wu X, **ao Y (2013) Estimating the environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint at the global level: a spatial econometric approach. Ecol Indic 34:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Bui Q, Zhang B (2020) The relationship between biomass energy consumption and human development: empirical evidence from BRICS countries. Energy 194, 116906

  • Westerlund J (2008) Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. J Appl Econom 23(2):193–233

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wildlife Fund (2018) Living planet report: 2018 aiming higher. https://d2hawiim0tjbd8.cloudfront.net/downloads/lpr__2018_full_report.pdf. Accessed 12 4 2020

  • Yasin I, Ahmad N, Chaudhary MA (2020) Catechizing the environmental-impression of urbanization, financial development, and political institutions: a circumstance of ecological footprints in 110 developed and less-developed countries. Soc Indic Res 147(2):621–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilanci V, Gorus MS, Aydin M (2019) Are shocks to ecological footprint in OECD countries permanent or temporary? J Clean Prod 212:270–301

    Google Scholar 

  • You WH, Zhu HM, Yu K, Peng C (2015) Democracy, financial openness, and global carbon dioxide emissions: heterogeneity across existing emission levels. World Dev 66:189–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar MW, Mirza FM, Zaidi SAH, Hou F (2019) The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO 2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(15):15162–15173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JW, Baloch MA, Mahmood N (2019) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhenhua XIE (2020) China’s historical evolution of environmental protection along with the forty years’ reform and opening-up moving from the control of three wastes to the construction of ecological civilization. Environ Sci Ecotechno 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2019.100001

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Statistics, Sakarya University, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey

    Mucahit Aydin

  2. Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Econometrics, Sakarya University, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey

    Yunus Emre Turan

Authors
  1. Mucahit Aydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunus Emre Turan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mucahit Aydin.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 3
figure 3

GDP and population in BRICS countries in 2020. Note: a and b show the GDP and population, respectively

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Ecological footprint in BRICS countries. Source: Danish et al. (2020)

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydin, M., Turan, Y.E. The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 43233–43245 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation