Abstract
New developments in the fields of artificial intelligence or robotics are receiving considerable attention from businesses, as they promise astonishing gains in process efficiency—sparking a surge of corporate investments in new, digital technologies. Yet, firms did not become per se more productive, as labor productivity growth in various industrial nations has decelerated in recent years. The fact that the adoption of innovative technologies is not accompanied by productivity increases has already been observed during the dawn of the computer age and became known as Solow’s Paradox. Thus, this paper takes stock of what is known about the Solow Paradox, before incorporating the findings into the debate of the current productivity slowdown. Based on an in-depth review of 86 empirical studies at the firm level, this paper uncovers various reasons for the emergence of the Solow Paradox, debates its following reversal marked by the occurrence of excess returns and deduces a model of factors influencing the returns on IT investments. Based on these insights, four overarching explanations of the modern productivity paradox namely adjustment delays, measurement issues, exaggerated expectations and mismanagement are discussed, whereby mismanagement emerges as a currently neglected, but focal issue.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For an excellent discussion of parametric and non-parametric approaches, see Cardona et al. (2013).
Because of this broad definition, the terms IT and information and communication technology (ICT) are used interchangeably within this work.
The search process was last updated on 20 February 2019.
Rational managers should invest in an input factor until an additional unit of the input creates no more value than its costs, resulting in a net marginal product of zero. Therefore, if the marginal returns outweigh the marginal costs, the difference is referred to as an excess marginal product or excess return (see Lehr and Lichtenberg 1999).
Weil (2007) further disaggregated IT-Investments into infrastructural, informational, transactional and strategic ones.
These categories are quite similar to the ones proposed by Brynjolfsson (1993), but contain different sub-categories.
Meaning a “faster automation than socially desirable” (Acemoglu and Restrepo 2019, p. 210).
References
References marked with an asterisk indicate papers included in the literature review
Abernathy WJ (1978) The productivity dilemma: Roadlock to innovation in the automobile industry. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
*Aboal D, Tacsir E (2018) Innovation and productivity in services and manufacturing: the role of ICT. Ind Corp Change 27:221–241
Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad Manag Rev 16:586–612
Abrahamson E (1996) Management fashion. Acad Manag Rev 21:254–285
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2019) Artificial intelligence, automation and work. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence: an agenda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 197–236
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018) The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am Econ Rev 108:1488–1542
Acemoglu D, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Price B (2014) Return of the Solow paradox? IT, productivity, and employment in US manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 104:394–399
Ackoff RL (1967) Management misinformation systems. Manag Sci 14:B-147–B-156
Aghion P, Jones BF, Jones CI (2019) Artificial intelligence and economic growth. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence: an agenda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 237–282
Agarwal R, Audretsch D, Sarkar MB (2010) Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship. Strateg Entrep J 4:271–283
Agrawal AK, McHale J, Oettl A (2019a) Finding needles in haystacks: artificial intelligence and recombinant growth. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence: an agenda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 149–174
Agrawal AK, Gans JS, Goldfarb A (2019b) Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence: prediction versus judgment. Econ Policy 47:1–6
AIS (2011) Senior scholars’ basket of journals. https://aisnet.org/page/SeniorScholarBasket. Accessed 14 Jan 2018
Alpar P, Kim M (1990) A microeconomic approach to the measurement of information technology value. J Manag Inf Syst 7:55–69
Amit R, Zott C (2010) Business model innovation: creating value in times of change. Working paper
Anderson MC, Banker RD, Ravindran S (2003) The new productivity paradox. Commun ACM 46:91–94
Andrews D, Criscuolo C, Gal PN (2016) The best versus the rest: the global productivity slowdown, divergence across firms and the role of public policy. OECD working paper
Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ Sci 18:763–780
Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29:155–173
Arvanitis S, Loukis EN (2009) Information and communication technologies, human capital, workplace organization and labour productivity: a comparative study based on firm-level data for Greece and Switzerland. Inf Econ Policy 21:43–61
Autor DH, Dorn D, Katz LF, Patterson C, van Reenen J (2017) The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. NBER Working paper no. w23396
Autor DH, Levy F, Murnane RJ (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration. Q J Econ 118:1279–1333
*Badescu M, Garcés-Ayerbe C (2009) The impact of information technologies on firm productivity: empirical evidence from Spain. Technovation 29:122–129
Baily MN, Gordon RJ, Nordhaus WD, Romer D (1988) The productivity slowdown, measurement issues, and the explosion of computer power. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1988:347–431
*Baker J, Song J, Jones DR (2017) Closing the loop: empirical evidence for a positive feedback model of IT business value creation. J Strateg Inf Syst 26:142–160
*Baker J, Song J, Jones DR, Ford EW (2008) Information systems and healthcare XXIX: information technology investments and returns—uniqueness in the healthcare industry. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 23:375–392
Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120
*Barua A, Lee B (1997) An economic analysis of the introduction of an electronic data interchange system. Inf Syst Res 8:398–422
Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T (1995) Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inf Syst Res 6:3–23
Bauer J, Jannach D (2018) Optimal pricing in e-commerce based on sparse and noisy data. Decis Support Syst 106:53–63
*Becchetti L, Dal Bedoya, Paganetto L (2003) ICT Investment, productivity and efficiency: evidence at firm-level using a stochastic frontier approach. J Prod Anal 20:143–167
Berman SJ (2012) Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models. Strategy Leadersh 40:16–24
*Bertschek I, Kaiser U (2004) Productivity effects of organizational change: microeconometric evidence. Manag Sci 50:394–404
Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Q 24:169–196
Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Manag Sci 45:1008–1024
Black SE, Lynch LM (2001) How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev Econ Stat 83:434–445
*Bloom N, Sadun R, van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Am Econ Rev 102:167–201
Bloom N, Jones CI, van Reenen J, Webb M (2017) Are ideas getting harder to find? NBER working paper no. 23782
BLS (2019) Nonfarm business—labor productivity (output per hour), percent change from previous quarter—PRS85006092 (including annual average). https://www.bls.gov/lpc/#data. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? J Econom 65:83–108
*Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Q J Econ 117:339–376
Broadbent M, Weill P, Neo BS (1999) Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability. J Strateg Inf Syst 8:157–187
Brynjolfsson E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun ACM 36:66–77
Brynjolfsson E (2003) ROI valuation: the IT productivity gap. Optim Mag 21:1–4
*Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1995) Information technology as a factor of production: the role of differences among firms. Econ Innovat New Tech 3:183–200
*Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Manag Sci 42:541–558
Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1998) Beyond the productivity paradox. Commun ACM 41:49–55
Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2000) Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J Econ Perspect 14:23–48
*Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: firm-level evidence. Rev Econ Stat 85:793–808
Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2012) Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Digital Frontier Press, Lexington
Brynjolfsson E, Mendelson H (1993) Information systems and the organization of modern enterprise. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 3:245–255
Brynjolfsson E, Saunders A (2009) Wired for innovation: how information technology is resha** the economy. MIT Press, Cambridge
Brynjolfsson E, Yang S (1996) Information technology and productivity: a review of the literature. In: Zelkowitz M (ed) Advances in computers, vol 43. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 179–214
Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: computers and organizational capital. Brookings Pap Econ Act 2002:137–181
Brynjolfsson E, Collis A, Eggers F (2019a) Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:7250–7255
Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2019b) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: a clash of expectations and statistics. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence: an agenda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 23–57
Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2018) The productivity J-curve: how intangibles complement general purpose technologies. NBER working paper no. 25148
*Byrd TA, Marshall TE (1997) Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis. Omega-Int J Manag S 25:43–56
Byrne DM, Fernald JG, Reinsdorf MB (2016) Does the United States have a productivity slowdown or a measurement problem? Brookings Pap Econ Act 2016:109–182
Cardona M, Kretschmer T, Strobel T (2013) ICT and productivity: conclusions from the empirical literature. Inf Econ Policy 25:109–125
Carr NG (2003) IT does not matter. Educause Rev 38:24–38
*Castiglione C, Infante D (2014) ICTs and time-span in technical efficiency gains. A stochastic frontier approach over a panel of Italian manufacturing firms. Econ Model 41:55–65
Chan YE, Reich BH (2007) IT alignment: what have we learned? J Inf Technol 22:297–315
*Chang YB, Gurbaxani V (2012) The Impact of IT-related spillovers on long-run productivity: an empirical analysis. Inf Syst Res 23:868–886
Chang YB, Gurbaxani V (2013) An empirical analysis of technical efficiency: the role of IT intensity and competition. Inf Syst Res 24:561–578
Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plann 43:354–363
*Chowdhury SK (2006) Investments in ICT-capital and economic performance of small and medium scale enterprises in East Africa. J Int Dev 18:533–552
*Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL, Melville NP (2010) Research note—does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inf Syst Res 21:392–408
Clemons EK, Row MC (1991) Sustaining IT advantage: the role of structural differences. MIS Q 15:275–292
Cockburn IM, Henderson R, Stern S (2019) The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence: an agenda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 115–146
*Commander S, Harrison R, Menezes-Filho N (2011) ICT and productivity in develo** countries: new firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. Rev Econ Stat 93:528–541
Corrado C, Hulten C, Sichel D (2009) Intangible capital and US economic growth. Rev Income Wealth 55:661–685
Crafts N (2004) Steam as a general purpose technology: a growth accounting perspective. Econ J 114:338–351
Crafts N (2018) The productivity slowdown: is it the ‘new normal’? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 34:443–460
*Dasgupta S, Sarkis J, Talluri S (1999) Influence of information technology investment on firm productivity: a cross-sectional study. Logist Inf Manag 12:120–129
Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Davenport TH, Ronanki R (2018) Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harv Bus Rev 96:108–116
David PA (1990) The Dynamo and the computer: an historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Am Econ Rev 80:355–361
Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: a critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput Surv 35:1–28
Dehning B, Richardson VJ (2002) Returns on investments in information technology: a research synthesis. J Inf Syst 16:7–30
Denison EF (1989) Estimates of productivity change by industry: an evaluation and an alternative. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
*Devaraj S, Kohli R (2000) Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. J Manag Inf Syst 16:41–67
Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Manag Sci 49:273–289
Dewan S, Kraemer KL (2000) Information technology and productivity: evidence from country-level data. Manag Sci 46:548–562
*Dewan S, Min C-k (1997) The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: a firm level analysis. Manag Sci 43:1660–1675
*Dewan S, Shi C, Gurbaxani V (2007) Investigating the risk–return relationship of information technology investment: firm-level empirical analysis. Manag Sci 53:1829–1842
Diewert WE, Fox KJ (1999) Can measurement error explain the productivity paradox? Can J Econ 32:251–280
Diewert WE, Fox KJ, Schreyer P (2018) The digital economy, new products and consumer welfare. Working paper
*Doms ME, Jarmin RS, Klimek SD (2004) Information technology investment and firm performance in US retail trade. Econ Innovat New Tech 13:595–613
Dos Santos B, Sussman L (2000) Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox. Int J Inf Manag 20:429–440
*Dunne T, Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Troske KR (2004) Wage and productivity dispersion in United States manufacturing: the role of computer investment. J Labor Econ 22:397–429
Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2004) The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inform Soc 20:325–344
Feldstein M (2015) The US underestimates growth. Wall Str J 18:2015
Fisch C, Block J (2018) Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research. Manag Rev Q 68:103–106
*Francalanci C, Galal H (1998a) Aligning IT investments and workforce composition: the impact of diversification in life insurance companies. Eur J Inf Syst 7:175–184
*Francalanci C, Galal H (1998b) Information technology and worker composition: determinants of productivity in the life insurance industry insurance companies. MIS Q 22:227–241
Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol Forecast Soc Change 114:254–280
Gal P, Nicoletti G, Renault T, Sorbe S, Timiliotis C (2019) Digitalisation and productivity: In search of the holy grail—firm-level empirical evidence from EU countries. OECD working paper
*Gargallo-Castel A, Galve-Górriz C (2007) Information technology, complementarities and three measures of organizational performance: empirical evidence from Spain. J Inf Technol Impact 7:43–58
Gartner (2019) Gartner says global IT spending to reach $3.8 trillion in 2019. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-01-28-gartner-says-global-it-spending-to-reach–3-8-trillio. Accessed 05 Mar 2019
Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10:92–116
*Giuri P, Torrisi S, Zinovyeva N (2008) ICT, skills, and organizational change: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Ind Corp Change 17:29–64
Gordon RJ (2000) Does the “new economy” measure up to the great inventions of the past? J Econ Perspect 14:49–74
Gordon RJ (2004) Five puzzles in the behavior of productivity, investment, and innovation. NBER Working paper no. 10660
Gordon RJ (2016) The rise and fall of American growth: The US standard of living since the civil war. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Greenana N, Mairesse J (2000) Computers and productivity in France: some evidence. Econ Innovat New Tech 9:275–315
Gurbaxani V, Whang S (1991) The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Commun ACM 34:59–73
*Hall BH, Lotti F, Mairesse J (2013) Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms. Econ Innovat New Tech 22:300–328
Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work: do not automate, obliterate. Harv Bus Rev 68:104–112
Hartmann PM, Zaki M, Feldmann N, Neely A (2016) Capturing value from big data–a taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms. Int J Oper Prod Manag 36:1382–1406
*Hempell T (2005a) Does experience matter? Innovations and the productivity of information and communication technologies in German services. Econ Innovat New Tech 14:277–303
*Hempell T (2005b) What’s spurious, what’s real? Measuring the productivity impacts of ICT at the firm-level. Empir Econ 30:427–464
Henderson JC, Venkatraman N (1993) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst J 32:4–16
*Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Q 20:121–142
*Hitt LM, Wu DJ, Zhou X (2002) Investment in enterprise resource planning: business impact and productivity measures. J Manag Inf Syst 19:71–98
Ho JL, Wu A, Xu SX (2011) Corporate governance and returns on information technology investment: evidence from an emerging market. Strat Manag J 32:595–623
*Hu Q, Plant R (2001) An empirical study of the casual relationship between IT investment and firm performance. Inf Resour Manag J 14:15–26
*Huang T-H (2005) A Study on the productivities of IT capital and computer labor: firm-level evidence from Taiwan’s banking industry. J Prod Anal 24:241–257
*Huang CJ, Fu T-T, Lai H-P, Yang Y-L (2017) Semiparametric smooth coefficient quantile estimation of the production profile. Empir Econ 52:373–392
IDC (2019) Worldwide blockchain spending forecast to reach $2.9 billion in 2019, according to new IDC spending guide. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS44898819. Accessed 05 Mar 2019
Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360
Jorgenson DW, Stiroh KJ, Gordon RJ, Sichel DE (2000) Raising the speed limit: US economic growth in the information age. Brookings Pap Econ Act 2000:125–235
Kart L, Heudecker N, Buytendijk F (2013) Survey analysis: big data adoption in 2013 shows substance behind the hype. https://www.gartner.com/doc/2589121/survey-analysis-big-data-adoption. Accessed 1 Dec 2018
Kauffman R, Weill P (1989) An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of information technology investment. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on information systems, pp 377–388
*Khanna R, Sharma C (2018) Testing the effect of investments in IT and R&D on labour productivity: new method and evidence for Indian firms. Econ Lett 173:30–34
*Kılıçaslan Y, Sickles RC, Atay Kayış A, Üçdoğruk Gürel Y (2017) Impact of ICT on the productivity of the firm: evidence from Turkish manufacturing. J Prod Anal 47:277–289
*Kim C-S, Davidson LF (2004) The effects of IT expenditures on banks’ business performance: using a balanced scorecard approach. Manag Finance 30:28–45
*Ko M, Osei-Bryson K-M (2004) Using regression splines to assess the impact of information technology investments on productivity in the health care industry. Inf Syst J 14:43–63
*Ko M, Osei-Bryson K-M (2006) Analyzing the impact of information technology investments using regression and data mining techniques. J Enterp Inf Manag 19:403–417
*Ko M, Osei-Bryson K-M (2008) Reexamining the impact of information technology investment on productivity using regression tree and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). Inf Technol Manag 9:285–299
Kohli R, Devaraj S (2003) Measuring information technology payoff: a meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inf Syst Res 14:127–145
Kohli R, Grover V (2008) Business value of IT: an essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. J Assoc Inf Syst 9:23–39
KPMG (2018) Ready, Set, Fail?: Avoiding setbacks in the intelligent automation race. https://advisory.kpmg.us/content/advisory/en/index/articles/2018/new-study-findings-read-ready-set-fail.html. Accessed 19 Nov 2018
*Kudyba S, Diwan R (2002) Research report: increasing returns to information technology. Inf Syst Res 13:104–111
Kwon MJ, Stoneman P (1995) The impact of technology adoption on firm productivity. Econ Innovat New Tech 3:219–234
*Lee B, Barua A (1999) An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: old data, new analysis and evidence. J Prod Anal 12:21–43
*Lee B, Menon NM (2000) Information technology value through different normative lenses. J Manag Inf Syst 16:99–119
*Lee S, **ang JY, Kim JK (2011) Information technology and productivity: empirical evidence from the Chinese electronics industry. Inf Manag 48:79–87
*Lee J, McCullough JS, Town RJ (2013) The impact of health information technology on hospital productivity. RAND J Econ 44:545–568
*Lehr W, Lichtenberg FR (1998) Computer Use and productivity growth in US Federal Government Agencies, 1987–92. J Ind Econ 46:257–279
*Lehr B, Lichtenberg F (1999) Information technology and its impact on productivity: firm-level evidence from government and private data sources, 1977–1993. Can J Econ 32:335–362
*Licht G, Moch D (1999) Innovation and information technology in services. Can J Econ 32:363–383
*Lichtenberg FR (1995) The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: a firm-level analysis. Econ Innovat New Tech 3:201–218
Lim J-H, Stratopoulos TC, Wirjanto TS (2013) Sustainability of a firm’s reputation for information technology capability: the role of senior IT executives. J Manag Inf Syst 30:57–96
*Liu T-K, Chen J-R, Huang CJ, Yang C-H (2014) Revisiting the productivity paradox: a semiparametric smooth coefficient approach based on evidence from Taiwan. Technol Forecast Soc Change 81:300–308
*Loveman GW (1994) An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. In: Allen T, Scott M (eds) Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s: research studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 88–110
*Loukis E, Sapounas I, Aivalis K (2007) The effect of generalized competition and strategy on the business value of information and communication technologies. J Enterp Inf Manag 21:24–38
*Luo Y, Bu J (2016) How valuable is information and communication technology? A study of emerging economy enterprises. J World Bus 51:200–211
Macdonald S, Anderson P, Kimbel D (2000) Measurement or management?: Revisiting the productivity paradox of information technology. Vierteljahresh Wirtschaftsforsch 69:601–617
*Mahmood MA (1993) Associating organizational strategic performance with information technology investment: an exploratory research. Eur J Inf Syst 2:185–200
*Mahmood MA, Mann GJ (1993) Measuring the organizational impact of information technology investment: an exploratory study. J Manag Inf Syst 10:97–122
*Mahmood MA, Mann GJ (2005) Information technology investments and organizational productivity and performance: an empirical investigation. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 15:185–202
Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun ACM 30:484–497
Mata FJ, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 19:487–505
Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: information technology and organizational performance—an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q 28:283–322
*Melville N, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer K (2007) The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: the role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decis Support Syst 43:229–242
*Menon NM, Lee B, Eldenburg L (2000) Productivity of information systems in the healthcare industry. Inf Syst Res 11:83–92
*Menon NM, Yaylacicegi U, Cezar A (2009) Differential effects of the two types of information systems: a hospital-based study. J Manag Inf Syst 26:297–316
Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization. Am Econ Rev 80:511–528
*Mithas S, Tafti A, Bardhan I, Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Q 36:205–224
Mitra S, Chaya AK (1996) Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: the impact of information technology spending. J Manag Inf Syst 13:29–57
Mokyr J (2014) Secular stagnation? Not in your life. In: Teulings C, Baldwin R (eds) Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures. CEPR Press, London, pp 83–89
Moshiri S, Simpson W (2011) Information technology and the changing workplace in Canada: firm-level evidence. Ind Corp Change 20:1601–1636
Nakata C, Zhu Z (2006) Information technology and customer orientation: a study of direct, mediated, and interactive linkages. J Marketing Manag 22:319–354
*Neirotti P, Paolucci E (2007) Assessing the strategic value of information technology: an analysis on the insurance sector. Inf Manag 44:568–582
Nordhaus WD (2015) Are we approaching an economic singularity? Information technology and the future of economic growth. NBER working paper no. 21547
Obermaier R (2019) Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Transformation als unternehmerische Gestaltungsaufgabe. In: Obermaier R (ed) Handbuch Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Transformation: Betriebswirtschaftliche, technische und rechtliche Herausforderungen, 1st edn. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 3–46
OECD (2019) Labour productivity and utilisation: labour productivity, annual growth rate (%), 2000–2018. https://data.oecd.org/lprdty/labour-productivity-and-utilisation.htm. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
O’Reilly CA III (1980) Individuals and information overload in organizations: is more necessarily better? Acad Manag J 23:684–696
*Osei-Bryson K-M, Ko M (2004) Exploring the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance using regression splines analysis. Inf Manag 42:1–13
Oz E (2005) Information technology productivity: in search of a definite observation. Inf Manag 42:789–798
Polák P (2017) The productivity paradox: a meta-analysis. Inf Econ Policy 38:38–54
Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2014) How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harv Bus Rev 92:64–88
Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2015) How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harv Bus Rev 93:96–114
Radner R (1993) The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrican 61:1109–1146
*Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (1996) Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: an empirical investigation. Omega-Int J Manag S 24:399–412
*Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Commun ACM 40:89–97
*Ramirez R, Melville N, Lawler E (2010) Information technology infrastructure, organizational process redesign, and business value: an empirical analysis. Decis Support Syst 49:417–429
Ransbotham S, Gerbert P, Reeves M, Kiron D, Spira M (2018) Artificial intelligence in business gets real: research report. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/artificial-intelligence-in-business-gets-real/. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 29:625–652
*Ross A (2002) A multi-dimensional empirical exploration of technology investment, coordination and firm performance. Int J Phys Distr Log Manag 32:591–609
Ross SA (1973) The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. Am Econ Rev 63:134–139
Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A (2015) Information technology impacts on firm performance: an extension of Kohli and Devaraj (2003). MIS Q 39:809–836
Schick AG, Gordon LA, Haka S (1990) Information overload: a temporal approach. Account Organ Soc 15:199–220
Schryen G (2013) Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. Eur J Inf Syst 22:139–169
Shao BBM, Lin WT (2002) Technical efficiency analysis of information technology investments: a two-stage empirical investigation. Inf Manag 39:391–401
Shapiro C, Carl S, Varian HR (1999) Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Press, Boston
*Shu W, Strassmann PA (2005) Does information technology provide banks with profit? Inf Manag 42:781–787
Simon HA (1987) The steam engine and the computer: what makes technology revolutionary. Educom Bulletin 22:2–5
*Sircar S, Choi J (2009) A study of the impact of information technology on firm performance: a flexible production function approach. Inf Syst J 19:313–339
*Sircar S, Turnbow JL, Bordoloi B (2000) A framework for assessing the relationship between information technology investments and firm performance. J Manag Inf Syst 16:69–97
Soh C, Markus ML (1995) How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on information systems, pp 29–41
Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39:312–320
Solow RM (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times, New York
Spitz-Oener A (2006) Technical change, job tasks, and rising educational demands: looking outside the wage structure. J Labor Econ 24:235–270
*Stare M, Jaklič A, Kotnik P (2006) Exploiting ICT potential in service firms in transition economies. Serv Ind J 26:287–302
Statcounter (2018) Search engine market share worldwide. http://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share. Accessed 13 Dec 2018
Stiroh KJ (2005) Reassessing the impact of IT in the production function: a meta-analysis and sensitivity tests. Ann Econ Stat 79:529–561
*Strassmann PA (1985) Information payoff: the transformation of work in the electronic age. Macmillan Publishers, London
*Strassmann PA (1990) The business value of computers: an executive’s guide. Information Economics Press, New Canaan
Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J Econ Lit 49:326–365
Syverson C (2017) Challenges to mismeasurement explanations for the US productivity slowdown. J Econ Perspect 31:165–186
Tallon PP, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V (2000) Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. J Manag Inf Syst 16:145–173
*Tam KY (1998) Analysis of firm-level computer investments: a comparative study of three Pacific-rim economies. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 45:276–286
*Tambe P, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: new evidence from IT labor data. Inf Syst Res 23:599–617
*Tambe P, Hitt LM (2014a) Job hop**, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. Manag Sci 60:338–355
*Tambe P, Hitt LM (2014b) Measuring information technology spillovers. Inf Syst Res 25:53–71
*Tambe P, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: how external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Manag Sci 58:843–859
Trajtenberg M (2019) Artificial intelligence as the next GPT: a political-economy perspective. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence: an agenda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 175–186
Thong JYL, Yap C-S, Raman KS (1996) Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses. Inf Syst Res 7:248–267
Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for develo** evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14:207–222
Triplett JE (1999) The Solow productivity paradox: what do computers do to productivity? Can J Econ 32:309–334
Van Alstyne MW, Parker GG, Choudary SP (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harv Bus Rev 94:54–62
*Vinekar V, Teng JTC (2012) IT impacts in information and physical product industries. J Comput Inf Sys 53:65–71
Wade M, Hulland J (2004) The resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Q 28:107–142
Wang P (2010) Chasing the hottest IT: effects of information technology fashion on organizations. MIS Q 34:63–85
*Wang T, Wang Y, McLeod A (2018) Do health information technology investments impact hospital financial performance and productivity? Int J Account Inf Syst 28:1–13
Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q 26:13–23
*Weill P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inf Syst Res 3:307–333
Weill P, Olson MH (1989) Managing investment in information technology: mini case examples and implications. MIS Q 13:3–17
Wiengarten F, Humphreys P, Cao G, McHugh M (2013) Exploring the important role of organizational factors in IT business value: taking a contingency perspective on the resource-based view. Int J Manag Rev 15:30–46
Willcocks L, Lester S (1996) Beyond the IT productivity paradox. Eur Manag J 14:279–290
*Wilson DJ (2009) IT and beyond: the contribution of heterogeneous capital to productivity. J Bus Econ Stat 27:52–70
*Wu L, ** F, Hitt LM (2018) Are all spillovers created equal? A network perspective on information technology labor movements. Manag Sci 64:3168–3186
*Yorukoglu M (1998) The information technology productivity paradox. Rev Econ Dyn 1:551–592
*Zhu K (2004) The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: a resource-based assessment of their business value. J Manag Inf Syst 21:167–202
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schweikl, S., Obermaier, R. Lessons from three decades of IT productivity research: towards a better understanding of IT-induced productivity effects. Manag Rev Q 70, 461–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00173-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00173-6