Log in

Biomass production, relative competitive ability and water use efficiency of two dominant species in semiarid Loess Plateau under different water supply and fertilization treatments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Water stress and nutrient deficiency are considered to be the main environmental factors limiting plant growth and species interaction in semiarid regions. However, less is known about the interactive effects of soil water, nitrogen and phosphorus on native species growth and relative competitive ability. A replacement series design method was used with 12 mixed plants of Bothriochloa ischaemum and Lespedeza davurica grown in a pot experiment under three water regimes and four fertility treatments. Intercrop** systems were assessed on the basis of indices such as biomass production and allocation, relative competitive ability, aggressivity, relative yield total and water use efficiency (WUE). Water stress decreased significantly the total biomass production for each species, either in monoculture or in mixtures. N, P, or NP application can significantly improve biomass production of the two species in their mixtures. There was no obvious change trend in root/shoot ratio of B. ischaemum or L. davurica in different mixture proportions. Relative yield total (RYT) values ranged from 0.98 to 1.39. Aggressivity values of B. ischaemum to L. davurica were positive in all water regimes and fertilizations, implying that B. ischaemum was the dominant species. Relative competition intensity values of B. ischaemum (i.e., RCIB) were less than zero, while greater than zero for L. davurica (i.e., RCIL), indicating that the effects of intraspecific competition with L. davurica were stronger for B. ischaemum, and the opposite for L. davurica. WUE increased gradually as the proportion of B. ischaemum increased in mixtures, and a 10:2 B. ischaemum:L. davurica mixture proportion had significantly higher WUE. Results suggest that it is advantageous to grow the two species together to maximize biomass production and the recommended mixture ratio was 10:2 of B. ischaemum to L. davurica because it gave higher RYT and significantly higher WUE under conditions of water deficit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Aminpanah H, Javadi M (2011) A replacement series evaluation of competition between rice (Oryza sativa L.) and rice barnyardgrass (Echinochloa oryzicola Vasing). Sci Res Essays 6(23):5065–5071

    Google Scholar 

  • Armas C, Pugnaire FI (2005) Plant interactions govern population dynamics in a semi-arid plant community. J Ecol 93:978–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banik P, Sasmal T, Ghosal PK, Bagchi DK (2000) Evaluation of mustard (Brassica campestris var Toria) and legume intercrop** under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series systems. J Agron Crop Sci 185:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belcher JW, Keddy PA, Twolan-Strutt L (1995) Root and shoot competition intensity along a soil depth gradient. J Ecol 83:673–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecol 78:1958–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly J, Goma HC, Rahim K (2001) The information content of indicators in intercrop** research. Agric Ecosyst Environ 87:191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corre-Hellou G, Brisson N, Launay M, Fustec J, Crozat Y (2007) Effect of root depth penetration on soil nitrogen competitive interactions and dry matter production in pea–barley intercrops given different soil nitrogen supplies. Field Crop Res 103:76–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies WJ, Zhang J, Yang J, Dodd IC (2010) Novel crop science to improve yield and resource use efficiency in water-limited agriculture. J Agric Sci 1–9

  • Facelli E, Facelli JM, Smith SE, Mclaughlin MJ (1999) Interactive effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, intraspecific competition and resource availability on Trifolium subterraneum cv. Mt. Barker. New Phytol 141:535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming GF, Young FL, Ogg AG Jr (1988) Competitive relationships among winter wheat (Tritichum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci 36:479–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Duan AW, Sun JS, Li FS, Liu ZG, Liu H, Liu ZD (2009) Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercrop**. Field Crops Res 111:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gealy DR, Estorninos LE Jr, Gbur EE, Chavez RSC (2005) Interference interactions of two rice cultivars and their F3 cross with barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in a replacement series study. Weed Sci 53:323–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh PK (2004) Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercrop** systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Res 88:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson D (1999) Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plants. J Ecol 87:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Gooding M, Ambus P, Corre-Hellou G, Crozat Y, Dahlmann C, Dibet A, von Fragstein P, Pristeri A, Monti M, Jensen ES (2009) Pea–barley intercrop** for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic crop** systems. Field Crops Res 113:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He CX, Meng P, Zhang JS, Gao J, Sun SJ (2012) Water use of walnut-wheat intercrop** system based on stable carbon isotope technique in the low hilly area of North China. Acta Ecol Sin 32(7):2047–2055

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren M, Scheffer M, Huston MA (1997) The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communities. Ecology 78:1966–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao JY, Tzanopoulos J, Xofis P, Bai WJ, Ma XH, Mitchley J (2007) Can the study of natural vegetation succession assist in the control of soil erosion on abandoned croplands on the Loess Plateau, China? Restor Ecol 15(3):391–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeJeune KD, Seastedt TR (2001) Centaurea species: the forb that won the west. Conserv Biol 15:1568–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Li SM, Sun JH, Zhou LL, Bao XG, Zhang HG, Zhang FS (2007) Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(27):11192–11196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lithourgidis AS, Vlachostergios DN, Dordas CA, Damalas CA (2011) Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea–cereal intercrop** systems. Eur J Agron 34:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Duan M, Yu Z (2013) Agricultural landscapes and biodiversity in china. Agr Ecosyst Environ 165:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalet R (2007) Highlighting the multiple drivers of change in interactions along stress gradients. New Phytol 173:3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RA, Garrity DP (1993) Resource capture and utilization in intercrop** water. Field Crops Res 34:303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Wright JP (2003) Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem. Ecol Lett 6:567–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JD, Sinclair TR (1998) The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress. J Exp Bot 49(325):1381–1386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sammul M, Kull K, Oksanen L, Veromann P (2000) Competition intensity and its importance: results of field experiments with Anthoxanthum odoratum. Oecologia 125:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S, Ehleringer JR (2001) Water use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems. J Ecol 89:464–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semere T, Froud-Williams RJ (2001) The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and pea. J Appl Ecol 38:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan L, Chen GL (1993) Theory and practice of dryland farming on the Loess Plateau. Chinese Science Press, Bei**g

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan L, Xu BC (2009) Discuss about establishing stable artificial grassland in semiarid region on the Loess Plateau (in Chinese). Acta Pratacul Sin 18(2):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Townend J, Dickinson AL (1995) A comparison of rooting environments in containers of different sizes. Plant Soil 175:139–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Sardans J (1999) Plant competition in Mediterranean-type vegetation. J Veg Sci 10:281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YQ, Shao MA, Zhu YJ, Liu ZP (2011) Impacts of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China. Agric For Meteorol 151:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JP, Dong LJ, Sang WG (2012) Effects of different nitrogen regimes on competition between Ambrosia artemisiifolia, an invasive species, and two native species, Artemisia annua and Artemisia mongolica. Biodivers Sci 20(1):3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wedin D, Tilman D (1993) Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient: initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecol Monogr 63:199–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt A, Jolliffe P (2003) Indices of plant competition. J Ecol 91:707–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel PR, Van der Valk AG (1998) Effects of nutrient and soil moisture on competition between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea, and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecol 138:179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield CP, Davison AW, Ashenden TW (1996) Interactive effects of ozone and soil volume on Plantago major. New Phytol 134:287–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu LR, Zhang JM, Ding SY (1997) Characteristic on the steppe of Bothriochloa ischaemum in Loess Plateau and its geographical significance (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin 17:88–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu BC, Xu WZ, Huang J et al (2011a) Biomass allocation, relative competitive ability and water use efficiency of two dominant species in semiarid Loess Plateau under water stress. Plant Sci 181:644–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu BC, Xu WZ, Huang J et al (2011b) Biomass production and relative competitiveness of a C3 legume and a C4 grass co-dominant in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Plant Soil 347:25–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang FS, Li L (2003) Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercrop** systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 248:305–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the anonymous referees and editors for their constructive comments. This work was supported financially by the Natural Science Foundation of China (41071339), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NECT-11-0444) and Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-YW-QN412).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing-Cheng Xu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 103 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, BC., Xu, WZ., Gao, ZJ. et al. Biomass production, relative competitive ability and water use efficiency of two dominant species in semiarid Loess Plateau under different water supply and fertilization treatments. Ecol Res 28, 781–792 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-013-1061-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-013-1061-x

Keywords

Navigation