Log in

Analysis of the Spatial Variation and Identification of Factors Affecting the Water Resources Carrying Capacity Based on the Cloud Model

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To objectively analyze the effect of the water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) on sustainable regional development, a case study of Heilongjiang Province, China, is conducted. With a focus on the coordinated development of the water resources system, 16 indices are selected to establish an index-based WRCC evaluation system. In addition, based on the index values, initial values are obtained using a fuzzy combined weighting method. The WRCC evaluation levels are objectively generated using cloud model, and the temporal and spatial evolution of the WRCC in the study area is analyzed. The obstacle degree is used to analyze quantitatively the restraint relationship of each index to the carrying capacity. The present study classifies the WRCC into five evaluation levels: level I ([0.01, 0.21]), level II ([0.21, 0.37]), level III ([0.37, 0.47]), level IV ([0.47, 0.63]), and level V ([0.63, 0.82]). When determining the WRCC of each of the 13 observation points, the trend is consistent with both social and economic development, indicating that the evaluation criteria have a high degree of credibility. The main influencing factors of the WRCC also change, between 1999 and 2007, the irrigation coverage, amount of water resources per unit area, and gross domestic product per capita were the main factors, between 2008 and 2014, the agricultural water pollution index, population density, and percentage of industrial wastewater discharge compliant with consent conditions were the main factors. In addition, between 1999 and 2014, the ecological environment gradually became the main subsystem that limits the WRCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cheng K, Fu Q, Chen X, Li TX, Jiang QX, Ma XS, Zhao K (2015) Adaptive Allocation Modeling for a Complex System of Regional Water and Land Resources Based on Information Entropy and its Application. Water Resour Manag 29(14):4977–4993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng J, Zhou K, Chen D, Fan J (2016) Evaluation and analysis of provincial differences in resources and environment carrying capacity in China. Chin Geogr Sci 26(4):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Q, Meng FX, Li TX, Liu D, Gong FL, Osman A, Li Y (2016) Cloud model-based analysis of regional sustainable water resource utilization schemes. Int JAgric Biol Eng 9(5):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Q, Gong FL, Jiang QX, Cheng K, Dong H, Ma XS (2014) Risk assessment of the city water resources system based on Pansystems Observation-Control Model of Periphery. Nat Hazards 71(3):1899–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giri S, Qiu Z, Prato T, Luo B (2016) An Integrated Approach for Targeting Critical Source Areas to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution in Watersheds. Water Resour Manag 30(14):5087–5100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (1999) Carrying capacity in agriculture: Globe and regional issue. Ecol Econ 129(3):443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato T, Endo A (2017) Contrasting two dimensions of disaster-induced water-shortage experiences: water availability and access. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120982

  • Li M, Guo P, Singh VP, Yang G (2016) An uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water-land resources allocation and risk evaluation. Agric Water Manag 177:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DY, Cheung D, Shi X, Ng V (1998) Uncertainty reasoning based on cloud models in controllers. Comput Math Appl 35(3):99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li DY, Liu C, Gan W (2009) A new cognitive model: Cloud model. Int J Intell Syst 24(3):357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dong S, Mao Q (2012) Comprehensive evaluation of the water resource carrying capacity for China. Geogr Nat Resour 33(1):92–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Liu H (2012) A Study on the Change Trends of Regional Water Resource Carrying Capacity. Green Commun Netw 113(4):1375–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Shao J, Xu W, Meng Y (2013) Prediction of rock burst classification using the technique of cloud models with attribution weight. Nat Hazards 68(2):549–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng L, Chen Y, Li W, Zhao R (2009) Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for water resources carrying capacity in Tarim River Basin, **njiang, China. Chin Geogr Sci 19(1):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parhoudeh S, Baziar A, Mazareie A, Kavousi-Fard A (2016) A novel stochastic framework based on fuzzy cloud theory for modeling uncertainty in the micro-grids. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 80(9):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson D (2002) Florida keys carrying capacity study. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation (13):489-501

  • Rijsberman M, Ven F (2000) Different approaches to assessment of design and management of sustainable urban water systems. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(3):333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawunyama T, Senzanje A, Mhizha A (2006) Estimation of small reservoir storage capacities in Limpopo River Basin using geographical information systems (GIS) and remotely sensed surface areas: Case of Mzingwane catchment. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 31(15):935–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeser M (1990) Enhancement of Carrying Capacity Options. The Resource Use Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zhai Z, Sang X, Li H (2017) Study on index system and judgment criterion of water resources carrying capacity. J Hydraul Eng 48(9):1023–1029 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang WH, Zhang C, Zhang Q (2014) An anomaly detection model based on cloud model and danger theory. Trustworthy Comput Serv 426:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Lei K, Khu S, Meng W (2015) Assessment of water resources carrying capacity for sustainable development based on a system dynamics model: a case study of Tieling City, China. Water Resour Manag 29(3):885–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Yu S (2007) Risk analysis on groundwater resources carrying capacity based on blind number theory. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 12(4):669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou K, Lin Y, Deng H, Li J, Liu C (2016) Prediction of rock burst classification using cloud model with entropy weight. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 26(7):1995–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou R, Pan Z, ** J, Li C, Ning S (2017) Forewarning Model of Regional Water Resources Carrying Capacity Based on Combination Weights and Entropy Principles. Entropy. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19110574

  • Zuo Q, Zhang X (2015) Dynamic carrying capacity of water resources under climate change. J Hydraul Eng 46(4):387–395 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 51609039), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (No. E2017006), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (funded project No. 2016 M601410), the Heilongjiang Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation (funded project No. LBH-Z16025), and the Key Laboratory of Efficient Use of Agricultural Water Resources, Ministry of Agriculture, P.R. China (No. 2017008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. Fu.

Additional information

Highlights

1. The criteria of regional WRCC are determined to scientifically evaluate the WRCC.

2. A fuzzy combined weighting method is proposed to effectively solve the fuzzy relation and uncertainty between the evaluation indices of the WRCC.

3. The quantitative relation of each index to the WRCC is quantified by introducing the obstacle degree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, K., Fu, Q., Meng, J. et al. Analysis of the Spatial Variation and Identification of Factors Affecting the Water Resources Carrying Capacity Based on the Cloud Model. Water Resour Manage 32, 2767–2781 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1957-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1957-x

Keywords

Navigation