Abstract
There is a heated debate about the efficacy of growth mindsets in predicting achievement and other key learning-related outcomes with some studies supporting and others failing to find evidence of growth mindset’s adaptive effects. Moreover, past studies on mindsets have mostly examined it as a psychological variable with little attention to how it interacts with socioeconomic status (SES). This study aims to examine (1) how growth mindsets are associated with key learning-related outcomes (i.e., motivation, engagement, and achievement) and (2) how growth mindsets interact with structural factors, specifically socioeconomic status at the individual and school level, in predicting key learning-related outcomes. The sample was drawn from the nationally representative Educational Longitudinal Study (ELS) dataset which contained responses from 15,362 tenth-grade students in the United States. Data were analyzed using hierarchical linear modeling to take into account the multi-level nature of the data. Though having a growth mindset was positively associated with better motivation and engagement for students across all socioeconomic strata, its effects on achievement were moderated by SES. A growth mindset positively predicted achievement only among students from more advantaged families but not among those from less advantaged families. This study highlights the importance of examining the interplay between mindsets and socioeconomic factors in understanding students’ motivation, engagement, and achievement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the National Center for Educational Statistics at http:// https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/els2002/ (Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002).
References
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by sha** theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
Bahník, Š, & Vranka, M. A. (2017). Growth mindset is not associated with scholastic aptitude in a large sample of university applicants. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.046
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). Socioeconomic status moderates the relationship between growth mindset and learning in mathematics and science: Evidence from PISA 2018 Philippine data. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1832635
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Chen, J., & Pajares, F. (2010). Implicit theories of ability of grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 75–87.
Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B.W.-Y. (2015). Classmate characteristics and student achievement in 33 countries: Classmates’ past achievement, family socioeconomic status, educational resources, and attitudes toward reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 152–169.
Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113
Corradi, D., Nicolaï, J., & Levrau, F. (2019). Growth mindset and its predictive validity—do migration background and academic validation matter? Higher Education, 77(3), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0286-6
Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 829. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829
Destin, M., Hanselman, P., Buontempo, J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Do student mindsets differ by socioeconomic status and explain disparities in academic achievement in the United States? AERA Open, 5(3), 2332858419857706. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419857706
Dweck, C. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. (2018) Retrieved from https://mindsetscholarsnetwork.org/carol-dweck-responds-recent-criticisms-growth-mindset-research/#
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Furnham, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & McDougall, F. (2003). Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2003.08.002
Gelman, A. (2016). Retrieved from https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2016/05/12/happy-talk-meet-the-edlin-factor/
Gorard, S., See, B. H. & Davies, P. (2012) The impact of attitudes and aspirations on educational attainment and participation (York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation). Available at: jrf. org. uk/publications/aspirations-educational-attainment-participation
Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Parents’ views of failure predict children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets. Psychological Science, 27(6), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616639727
Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.006
Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D.M.-S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and co**: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class as culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414654
Langenkamp, A. G., & Carbonaro, W. (2018). How school socioeconomic status affects achievement growth across school transitions in early educational careers. Sociology of Education, 91(4), 358–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718802257
Li, C. (2013). Little’s test of missing completely at random. The Stata Journal, 13(4), 795–809.
Li, Y., & Bates, T. C. (2019). You can’t change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that’s how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1640–1655. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000669
Lou, N., & Noels, K. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 102126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102126
Moreau, D., Macnamara, B. N., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2018). Overstating the role of environmental factors in success: A cautionary note. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418797300
Macnamara, B. (2018). Schools are buying ‘growth mindset’ interventions despite scant evidence that they work well. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/schools-are-buying-growth-mindset-interventions-despitescant-evidence-that-they-work-well-96001
Macnamara, B. N., & Rupani, N. S. (2017). The relationship between intelligence and mindset. Intelligence, 64, 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.003
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
Markus, H. R., & Stephens, N. M. (2017). Inequality and social class: The psychological and behavioral consequences of inequality and social class: A theoretical integration. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, iv–xii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.11.001
Mills, I. M., & Mills, B. S. (2018). Insufficient evidence: Mindset intervention in developmental college math. Social Psychology of Education, 21(5), 1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9453-y
Miyamoto, Y., Yoo, J., Levine, C. S., Park, J., Boylan, J. M., Sims, T., Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S., Kawakami, N., Karasawa, M., Coe, C. L., Love, G. D., & Ryff, C. D. (2018). Culture and social hierarchy: Self- and other-oriented correlates of socioeconomic status across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000133
Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Suzuki, M., Marsh, H. W., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2016). Don’t aim too high for your kids: Parental overaspiration undermines students’ learning in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 766–779.
Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2002). Do low-achieving students benefit more from small classes? Evidence from the tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024003201
Oishi, S. (2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 581–609. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-030413-152156
Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2001). Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071434
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017
Perez-Felkner, L., Nix, S., & Thomas, K. (2017). Gendered pathways: How mathematics ability beliefs shape secondary and postsecondary course and degree field choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? Teacher College Record, 107, 1999–2045.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704
Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407.
Thomas, P. L. (2017). Rejecting growth mindset and grit at three levels. https://radicalscholarship.wordpress.com/2017/09/21/rejecting-growth-mindset-and-grit-atthreelevels/
United States Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Education Longitudinal Study (ELS), 2002: Base Year. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04275.v1
Walton, G. M., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420904453
Wormelli, R. (2018, August). Grit and growth mindset: Deficit thinking? Examining the cultural narrative around these ideologies. AMLE Magazine, 6(3), 35–38. https://www.amle.org/BrowsebyTopic/WhatsNew/WNDet/TabId/270/ArtMID/888/ArticleID/937/Grit-and-Growth-Mindset-Deficit-Thinking.aspx
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., … Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
Yeager, D. S., Walton, G. M., Brady, S. T., Akcinar, E. N., Paunesku, D., Keane, L., Kamentz, D., Ritter, G., Duckworth, A. L., Urstein, R., Gomez, E. M., Markus, H. R., Cohen, G. L., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(24), E3341–E3348. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524360113
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, R.B., Trinidad, J.E. Growth mindset predicts achievement only among rich students: examining the interplay between mindset and socioeconomic status. Soc Psychol Educ 24, 635–652 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09616-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09616-z