Abstract
This study applies UNICEF’s rights-based multiple overlap** deprivation analysis framework to a single country case study—Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Using data from the Extended Living Standards Measurement Survey 2011 for children aged 5–15, the paper analyses the incidence and intensity of multidimensional child deprivation and examines its relationship to household-based monetary poverty, drawing on differences between rural and urban areas. Seven dimensions of deprivation have been identified using the child rights framework: Nutrition, Clothing, Educational Resources, Leisure, Social Participation, Information and Housing. We find that the majority of school-age children in BiH are deprived in one or more dimensions and one in four are deprived in three or more dimensions out of seven. Children in consumption poor households are more likely to be deprived in every dimension analysed separately and in a greater number of dimensions at once. Nevertheless, the degree of overlap between poverty and multidimensional deprivation is moderate, suggesting that child deprivation cannot be eradicated solely by increasing households’ consumption capacity. Finally, the study finds no significant differences by type of area in multidimensional deprivation rates for consumption-poor children aged 5–15. In contrast, non-poor children in rural areas are substantially more likely to be deprived in three or more dimensions at once than their counterparts in urban areas. Overall, these results call for a multifaceted policy approach targeting both the demand for and supply of children’s goods and services.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In practice, even the standard income and consumption based measures of poverty can be described as “multidimensional” as they include information about market prices of a basket of goods and services, while adjusting for varying household needs, such as size and composition (see also de Neubourg et al. 2014 for a review; Ravallion 2011).
The CRC has been signed by every state and ratified by all but one.
The global MPI (Alkire and Santos 2010) uses ten indicators related to three dimensions: health (nutrition; child mortality), education (years of schooling; school attendance), and living standard (cooking fuel; sanitation; water; electricity; floor; and assets).
For example, different indicators could be used to analyze nutritional deprivation for infants under 6 months (e.g. exclusive breastfeeding), those aged 6–24-months (e.g. appropriate feeding frequency), and older children (e.g. balanced diet: fruit and vegetables once a day).
However, multivariate analysis of correlates of multidimensional deprivation usually focus on one cut-off due to space limitations.
See the World Bank overview at http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/bosniaandherzegovina/overview (accessed on 30/12/2015).
Agency of Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics, and Institute for Statistics of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The final sample comprises 1998 children aged 5–15.
The indicators do not need to load on the same factor because they are meant to capture different facets of a dimension (e.g. housing: the overcrowding indicator measures space available to a family, while the sanitation indicator is a proxy for the quality of housing).
Children are more likely to be excluded from the study if they live in households headed by women or higher educated persons, or households with a lower ratio of inactive to working-age members. Because these characteristics are associated with lower risk of multidimensional deprivation (Ferrone and Chzhen 2015), this suggests an over-estimation of national multidimensional child poverty rates.
The maximum number of deprivations on the vertical axis is five rather than seven because the number of deprivations has been “smoothed” using a local weighted regression of the number of deprivations (an ordinal 0-7 variable) on the consumption aggregate (a continuous variable).
Monthly per-capita expenditure.
This exploits differences in deprivation across households with different consumption levels. Based on data from just one round of the survey, this simulation does not offer evidence on the effects of changing consumption for particular households.
References
Aaberge, R., & Brandolini, A. (2015). Multidimensional poverty and inequality. In F. Bourguignon & A. B. Atkinson (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 141–216). Amsterdam: Elsevier (Accessed December 28, 2015).
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2010). Designing the inequality-adjusted human development index. Human Development Research Paper, 2010/28. New York: UNDP.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476–487.
Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for develo** countries. Human Development Research Paper, 2010/11. New York: UNDP.
Atkinson, A. B. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation: Contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 51–65.
Bisogno, M., & Chong, A. (2002). Poverty and inequality in Bosnia and Herzegovina after the civil war. World Development, 30(1), 61–75.
Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 25–49.
Bradshaw, J., & Finch, N. (2003). Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 32(04), 513–525.
Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The future of children, 7(2), 55–71.
Bruckauf, Z. (2014). Child poverty and deprivation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Analysis of the Bosnia and Herzegovina household budget survey 2011 (Report for UNICEF Bosnia and Herzegovina). Bosnia and Herzegovina: UNICEF.
Chzhen, Y., & de Neubourg, C. (2014). Multiple overlap** deprivation analysis for the European Union (EU-MODA). Technical note, UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2014-01. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
Chzhen, Y., de Neubourg, C., Plavgo, I., & de Milliano, M. (2015). Child poverty in the European Union: The multiple overlap** deprivation analysis approach (EU-MODA). Child Indicators Research, 1–22. doi:10.1007/s12187-015-9321-7.
Corak, M. (2006). Do poor children become poor adults? Lessons from a cross-country comparison of generational earnings mobility. Research on Economic Inequality, 13, 143–188. doi:10.1016/S1049-2585(06)13006-9.
De Milliano, M., & Handa, S. (2014). Child poverty and deprivation in Mali—The first national estimates. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2014-20. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
de Milliano, M., & Plavgo, I. (2014). CC-MODA—Cross country multiple overlap** deprivation analysis—Analysing child poverty and deprivation in Sub-Saharan Africa. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2014-19. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
de Neubourg, C., Chai, J., de Milliano, M., Plavgo, I., & Wei, Z. (2012). Step-by-step guidelines to the multiple overlap** deprivation analysis (MODA). UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2012-10. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
de Neubourg, C., de Milliano, M., & Plavgo, I. (2014). Lost (in) dimensions: Consolidating progress in multidimensional poverty research. UNCIEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP 2014-04. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D. E., & Younger, S. D. (2006). Robust multidimensional poverty comparisons. The Economic Journal, 116(514), 943–968.
Dunbar, G. R., Lewbel, A., & Pendakur, K. (2013). Children’s resources in collective households: Identification, estimation, and an application to child poverty in Malawi. The American Economic Review, 103(1), 438–471.
Es**-Andersen, G., & Myles, J. (2009). Economic inequality and the welfare state. In The Oxford handbook of economic inequality (pp. 639–664). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferreira, F. H., & Lugo, M. A. (2013). Multidimensional poverty analysis: Looking for a middle ground. The World Bank Research Observer, 28(2), 220–235.
Ferrone, L., & Chzhen, Y. (2015). Child poverty and deprivation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: National multiple overlap** deprivation analysis (N-MODA). UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2015-02. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
Ferrone, L., & Handa, S. (2016). Child poverty in Tanzania. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper (forthcoming). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(3), 761–766.
Gordon, D., & Nandy, S. (2012). Measuring child poverty and deprivation. In A. Minu** & S. Nandy (Eds.), Global child poverty and well-being. Measurement, concepts, policy and action (pp. 57–101). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Gordon, D., Nandy, S., Pantazis, C., Pemberton, S., & Townsend, P. (2003). The distribution of child poverty in the develo** world. Bristol: Centre for International Poverty Research (Accessed September 27, 2013).
Gregg, P., & Machin, S. (2001). Childhood experiences, educational attainment and adult labour market performance. In K. Vleminckx & T. Smeeding (Eds.), Child well-being, child poverty and child policy in modern nations (pp. 129–150). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Guio, A.-C. (2009). What can be learned from deprivation indicators in Europe. Eurostat methodologies and working paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
International Monetary Fund. (2015). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Selected issues (Country Report No. 15/299). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Mangiavacchi, L., & Piccoli, L. (2011). Improving the measurement of child welfare in the context of intra-household inequality. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 226–232.
Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 235–248.
Ravallion, M. (2012a). Mashup indices of development. The World Bank Research Observer, 27(1), 1–32.
Ravallion, M. (2012b). Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 201–209.
UNICEF. (2007). Global study on child poverty and disparities 2007–2008 guide. New York: Global Policy Section Division of Policy and Planning.
UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries (Innocenti Report Card, 7). Florence: Innocenti Research Center.
UNICEF Office of Research. (2013). Child Well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview (Innocenti Report Card No. 11). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: United Nations.
White, H., Leavy, J., & Masters, A. (2003). Comparative perspectives on child poverty: A review of poverty measures. Journal of Human Development, 4(3), 379–396.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BHAS) and their partners, and to our colleagues of the UNICEF Country Office of BiH, in particular Sabina Zunic and Sanja Dunn. We also would like to thank the participants to the 6th ECINEQ Meeting for comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. The views expressed in this paper cannot be attributed to UNICEF; they are the responsibility of the authors alone.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chzhen, Y., Ferrone, L. Multidimensional Child Deprivation and Poverty Measurement: Case Study of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Soc Indic Res 131, 999–1014 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1291-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1291-8