Log in

Multidimensional Child Deprivation and Poverty Measurement: Case Study of Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study applies UNICEF’s rights-based multiple overlap** deprivation analysis framework to a single country case study—Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Using data from the Extended Living Standards Measurement Survey 2011 for children aged 5–15, the paper analyses the incidence and intensity of multidimensional child deprivation and examines its relationship to household-based monetary poverty, drawing on differences between rural and urban areas. Seven dimensions of deprivation have been identified using the child rights framework: Nutrition, Clothing, Educational Resources, Leisure, Social Participation, Information and Housing. We find that the majority of school-age children in BiH are deprived in one or more dimensions and one in four are deprived in three or more dimensions out of seven. Children in consumption poor households are more likely to be deprived in every dimension analysed separately and in a greater number of dimensions at once. Nevertheless, the degree of overlap between poverty and multidimensional deprivation is moderate, suggesting that child deprivation cannot be eradicated solely by increasing households’ consumption capacity. Finally, the study finds no significant differences by type of area in multidimensional deprivation rates for consumption-poor children aged 5–15. In contrast, non-poor children in rural areas are substantially more likely to be deprived in three or more dimensions at once than their counterparts in urban areas. Overall, these results call for a multifaceted policy approach targeting both the demand for and supply of children’s goods and services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In practice, even the standard income and consumption based measures of poverty can be described as “multidimensional” as they include information about market prices of a basket of goods and services, while adjusting for varying household needs, such as size and composition (see also de Neubourg et al. 2014 for a review; Ravallion 2011).

  2. The CRC has been signed by every state and ratified by all but one.

  3. The global MPI (Alkire and Santos 2010) uses ten indicators related to three dimensions: health (nutrition; child mortality), education (years of schooling; school attendance), and living standard (cooking fuel; sanitation; water; electricity; floor; and assets).

  4. For example, different indicators could be used to analyze nutritional deprivation for infants under 6 months (e.g. exclusive breastfeeding), those aged 6–24-months (e.g. appropriate feeding frequency), and older children (e.g. balanced diet: fruit and vegetables once a day).

  5. However, multivariate analysis of correlates of multidimensional deprivation usually focus on one cut-off due to space limitations.

  6. See the World Bank overview at http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/bosniaandherzegovina/overview (accessed on 30/12/2015).

  7. Agency of Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska Institute of Statistics, and Institute for Statistics of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

  8. The final sample comprises 1998 children aged 5–15.

  9. The indicators do not need to load on the same factor because they are meant to capture different facets of a dimension (e.g. housing: the overcrowding indicator measures space available to a family, while the sanitation indicator is a proxy for the quality of housing).

  10. Children are more likely to be excluded from the study if they live in households headed by women or higher educated persons, or households with a lower ratio of inactive to working-age members. Because these characteristics are associated with lower risk of multidimensional deprivation (Ferrone and Chzhen 2015), this suggests an over-estimation of national multidimensional child poverty rates.

  11. The maximum number of deprivations on the vertical axis is five rather than seven because the number of deprivations has been “smoothed” using a local weighted regression of the number of deprivations (an ordinal 0-7 variable) on the consumption aggregate (a continuous variable).

  12. Monthly per-capita expenditure.

  13. This exploits differences in deprivation across households with different consumption levels. Based on data from just one round of the survey, this simulation does not offer evidence on the effects of changing consumption for particular households.

References

  • Aaberge, R., & Brandolini, A. (2015). Multidimensional poverty and inequality. In F. Bourguignon & A. B. Atkinson (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 141–216). Amsterdam: Elsevier (Accessed December 28, 2015).

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2010). Designing the inequality-adjusted human development index. Human Development Research Paper, 2010/28. New York: UNDP.

  • Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for develo** countries. Human Development Research Paper, 2010/11.  New York: UNDP.

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2003). Multidimensional deprivation: Contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisogno, M., & Chong, A. (2002). Poverty and inequality in Bosnia and Herzegovina after the civil war. World Development, 30(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., & Finch, N. (2003). Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 32(04), 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The future of children, 7(2), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckauf, Z. (2014). Child poverty and deprivation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Analysis of the Bosnia and Herzegovina household budget survey 2011 (Report for UNICEF Bosnia and Herzegovina). Bosnia and Herzegovina: UNICEF.

  • Chzhen, Y., & de Neubourg, C. (2014). Multiple overlap** deprivation analysis for the European Union (EU-MODA). Technical note, UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2014-01. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • Chzhen, Y., de Neubourg, C., Plavgo, I., & de Milliano, M. (2015). Child poverty in the European Union: The multiple overlap** deprivation analysis approach (EU-MODA). Child Indicators Research, 1–22. doi:10.1007/s12187-015-9321-7.

  • Corak, M. (2006). Do poor children become poor adults? Lessons from a cross-country comparison of generational earnings mobility. Research on Economic Inequality, 13, 143–188. doi:10.1016/S1049-2585(06)13006-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Milliano, M., & Handa, S. (2014). Child poverty and deprivation in MaliThe first national estimates. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2014-20. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • de Milliano, M., & Plavgo, I. (2014). CC-MODACross country multiple overlap** deprivation analysisAnalysing child poverty and deprivation in Sub-Saharan Africa. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2014-19. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • de Neubourg, C., Chai, J., de Milliano, M., Plavgo, I., & Wei, Z. (2012). Step-by-step guidelines to the multiple overlap** deprivation analysis (MODA). UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2012-10. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • de Neubourg, C., de Milliano, M., & Plavgo, I. (2014). Lost (in) dimensions: Consolidating progress in multidimensional poverty research. UNCIEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP 2014-04. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • Duclos, J.-Y., Sahn, D. E., & Younger, S. D. (2006). Robust multidimensional poverty comparisons. The Economic Journal, 116(514), 943–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, G. R., Lewbel, A., & Pendakur, K. (2013). Children’s resources in collective households: Identification, estimation, and an application to child poverty in Malawi. The American Economic Review, 103(1), 438–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Es**-Andersen, G., & Myles, J. (2009). Economic inequality and the welfare state. In The Oxford handbook of economic inequality (pp. 639–664). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ferreira, F. H., & Lugo, M. A. (2013). Multidimensional poverty analysis: Looking for a middle ground. The World Bank Research Observer, 28(2), 220–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrone, L., & Chzhen, Y. (2015). Child poverty and deprivation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: National multiple overlap** deprivation analysis (N-MODA). UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2015-02. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • Ferrone, L., & Handa, S. (2016). Child poverty in Tanzania. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper (forthcoming). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(3), 761–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., & Nandy, S. (2012). Measuring child poverty and deprivation. In A. Minu** & S. Nandy (Eds.), Global child poverty and well-being. Measurement, concepts, policy and action (pp. 57–101). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., Nandy, S., Pantazis, C., Pemberton, S., & Townsend, P. (2003). The distribution of child poverty in the develo** world. Bristol: Centre for International Poverty Research (Accessed September 27, 2013).

  • Gregg, P., & Machin, S. (2001). Childhood experiences, educational attainment and adult labour market performance. In K. Vleminckx & T. Smeeding (Eds.), Child well-being, child poverty and child policy in modern nations (pp. 129–150). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A.-C. (2009). What can be learned from deprivation indicators in Europe. Eurostat methodologies and working paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  • International Monetary Fund. (2015). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Selected issues (Country Report No. 15/299). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

  • Mangiavacchi, L., & Piccoli, L. (2011). Improving the measurement of child welfare in the context of intra-household inequality. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2012a). Mashup indices of development. The World Bank Research Observer, 27(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2012b). Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. Journal of Development Economics, 99(2), 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2007). Global study on child poverty and disparities 20072008 guide. New York: Global Policy Section Division of Policy and Planning.

  • UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries (Innocenti Report Card, 7). Florence: Innocenti Research Center.

  • UNICEF Office of Research. (2013). Child Well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview (Innocenti Report Card No. 11). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti.

  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., Leavy, J., & Masters, A. (2003). Comparative perspectives on child poverty: A review of poverty measures. Journal of Human Development, 4(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BHAS) and their partners, and to our colleagues of the UNICEF Country Office of BiH, in particular Sabina Zunic and Sanja Dunn. We also would like to thank the participants to the 6th ECINEQ Meeting for comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. The views expressed in this paper cannot be attributed to UNICEF; they are the responsibility of the authors alone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Ferrone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chzhen, Y., Ferrone, L. Multidimensional Child Deprivation and Poverty Measurement: Case Study of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Soc Indic Res 131, 999–1014 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1291-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1291-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation