SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting Rape Empathy Based on Victim, Perpetrator, and Participant Gender, and History of Sexual Aggression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined empathy for a hypothetical rape victim and perpetrator based on gender of victim, perpetrator and participant, and sexual aggression experience. Undergraduates (n = 591, 333 female) from a United States east coast mid-size public university completed the Rape Victim and Perpetrator Empathy Scales (victim and perpetrator gender experimentally varied), and the Sexual Experiences Survey. Hypotheses were partially supported. Empathy was greater with the victim of a man than a woman. Women with victimization experience were especially empathic with a female victim. Men without victimization experience were relatively non-empathic with a male victim. Empathy was greater with a female than a male perpetrator, especially when her victim was male or when reported by women. A male rapist received the greatest empathy from men with perpetration experience. Findings are consistent with cultural expectations that women are victims and men are aggressors, and may imply that similarity in experience can facilitate rape empathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, I., & Lyons, A. (2005). The effect of victims’ social support on attributions of blame in female and male rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1400–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. A., & Whiston, S. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 374–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. A., Tetreault, P. A., & Masbad, I. (1987). Empathy with a rape victim: The role of similarity of experience. Violence and Victims, 2, 255–262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden, L. A., Karr, S. K., & Caldwell-Colbert, A. T. (1988). Effects of a university rape prevention program on attitudes and empathy toward rape. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, E. C., Chrisler, J. C., Hosdale, C., Osowiecki, D. M., & Veal, T. A. (1991). Date rape: Expectations, avoidance strategies, and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 427–429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carich, M. S., Metzger, C. K., Baig, M. S. A., & Harper, J. J. (2003). Enhancing victim empathy for sex offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 12, 255–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereoty** and reactions to depictions of stranger vs. acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, C. L., & Burke, S. (1999). An assessment of college students’ attitudes and empathy toward rape. College Student Journal, 43, 573–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., Pollard, P., & Archer, J. (2006). Effects of perpetrator gender and victim sexuality on blame toward male victims of sexual assault. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 275–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. R., & Byrnes, L. E. (1981). Attribution of responsibility for sexual assault: The influence of observer empathy and defendant occupation and attractiveness. Journal of Psychology, 108, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. R., Blackwell, K. T., Daley, P. C., & Bentley, B. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372–384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. R., Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10, 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, Y. M., & Marshall, W. L. (2003). Victim empathy, social self-esteem, and psychopathy in rapists. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiebert, M. S., & Tucci, L. M. (1998). Sexual coercion: Men victimized by women. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 6, 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/182369.pdf.

  • Garcia, M. M., Illescas, S. R., Ramirez, M. P., & Forero, C. G. (2008). Empatía en una muestra española de delincuentes sexuales. [Study of empathy in a Spanish sex offender sample] [Abstract]. Psicothema, 20, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, G. L., Cronin, J. M., & Steigman, H. J. (2004). Attributions of blame in sexual assault to perpetrators and victims of both genders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2149–2165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidycz, C. A., Lynn, S. L., Rich, C. L., Marioni, N. L., Blackwell, L. M., Stafford, J., et al. (2001). The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: A multisite investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 1073–1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, R., Kuntz, T., Laar, S. V., Williams, J., & Hall, D. S. (1996). College students’ judgments regarding sexual aggression during a date. Sex Roles, 35, 765–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, R., Hall, D., Nash, H., Formati, J., & Hopson, T. (2000). Judgments regarding sexual aggression as a function of sex of aggressor and victim. Sex Roles, 43, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. B. (1991). Effects of sex of aggressor, sex of target, and relationship on evaluations of physical aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. B., & Knight-Bohnhoff, K. (1996). Gender and aggression: I. Perceptions of aggression. Sex Roles, 35, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, J. A., & Abreu, J. M. (2003). Race and sex effects on attitudinal perceptions of acquaintance rape. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 252–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. (1975). Empathy and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1134–1146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., & Turner, A. P. (1999). Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms. Sex Roles, 40, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men’s self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., Yeater, E. A., & Fanetti, M. (2003). Rape prevention with college males: The roles of rape myth acceptance, victim empathy, and outcome expectancies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen-Fulero, L., & Fulero, S. M. (1997). Commonsense rape judgments: An empathy complexity theory of rape juror story making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 402–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osland, J. A., Fitch, M., & Willis, E. E. (1996). Likelihood to rape in college males. Sex Roles, 35, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, D. L., & Russell, B. L. (2006). Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: The role of aggressor gender and tactics. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinzone-Glover, H. A., Gidycz, C. A., & Jacobs, C. (1998). An acquaintance rape prevention program: Effects on attitudes toward women, rape-related attitudes, and perceptions of rape scenarios. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 605–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pithers, W. D. (1999). Empathy: Definition, enhancement, and relevance to the treatment of sexual abusers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network (2009). Who are the victims? Retrieved from http://www.rainn.org/get-information/statistics/sexual-assault-victims.

  • Rozee, P. D. (2008). Women’s fear of rape: Cause, consequences, and co**. In J. C. Chrisler, C. Golden, & P. D. Rozee (Eds.), Lectures on the psychology of women (pp. 322–337). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozee, P. D., & Koss, M. P. (2001). Rape: A century of resistance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarrel, P. M., & Masters, W. H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men by women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 117–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schewe, P. A., & O’Donohue, W. (1993). Sexual abuse prevention with high-risk males: The roles of victim empathy and rape myths. Violence and Victims, 8, 339–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., & Frieze, I. H. (2003). Examining rape empathy from the perspective of the victim and the assailant. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 476–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stermac, L., Bove, G. D., & Addison, M. (2004). Stranger and acquaintance sexual assault of adult males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 901–915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C., & Struckman-Johnson, D. (2006). A comparison of sexual coercion experiences reported by men and women in prison. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1591–1615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D., & Anderson, P. B. (2003). Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won’t take no for an answer. The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (2008). Criminal victimization. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cv08.htm.

  • Weir, J. A., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1990). The determinants of mock jurors’ verdicts in a rape case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 901–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD, 21801, USA

    Suzanne L. Osman

Authors
  1. Suzanne L. Osman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne L. Osman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Osman, S.L. Predicting Rape Empathy Based on Victim, Perpetrator, and Participant Gender, and History of Sexual Aggression. Sex Roles 64, 506–515 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9919-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9919-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation