Log in

Entrepreneurial Discovery as Constrained, Sytematic Search

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research uses a randomized, two-sample, post-test experiment to pit the alertness perspective against a new approach for searching systematically for venture ideas to create new wealth. The new approach uses self-selected consideration sets to constrain an entrepreneur’s search domain, which makes it possible to maximize the search results. The constrained domain conforms to the behavior of repeat entrepreneurs who do not search the whole world for venture ideas. Subjects in the treatment group were successful 60% of the time compared with 6.25% success rate for the control group. Fourteen percent of control group emulated the treatment group without receiving instructions to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B. (2003). Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research. Boston: Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., 1989. Economics of Information, Public lecture, reproduced in first report to March 1989, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Bombay: 41

  • Bar-Hillel M., Faulk R. (1982). Some Teasers Concerning Conditional Probabilities. Cognition 11: 109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J. B. (2001). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage 2nd Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W. J. (1993). Formal Entrepreneurship Theory in Economics: Existence and Bounds. Journal of Business Venturing 8: 197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., 2002. Behavioral Game Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

  • Davis D. D., Holt C. A. (2003). Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H. (1983). The Neglect of the Entrepreneur. In J. Ronen (ed.). Entrepreneurship, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus H. L., Dreyfus S. E. (1986). Mind Over Machine. Oxford, United Kingdom: Basil Blackwell, Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gächter S. (2000). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4): 980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiet J. O. (1996). The Informational Basis for Entrepreneurial Discovery. Small Business Economics 8: 419–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiet, J. O., 2000. Entrepreneurial Competence as Knowledge. This paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Entrepreneurship Division of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada

  • Fiet, J. O., ‚A Prescriptive Analysis of Search and Discovery’, Journal of Management Studies (in press)

  • Fiet J. O. (2002). Systematic Search for Entrepreneurial Discoveries. Westport, CN: Praeger

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiet J. O., Clouse V., Norton W. (2004). Systematic Search by Repeat Entrepreneurs. In John E. Butler (ed.). Opportunity Identification and Entrepreneurial Behavior, Greenwich Connecticut pp. 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiet J. O., Piskounov A., Patel P. C. (2005). Still Searching (Systematically) for Entrepreneurial Discoveries. Small Business Economics 25: 489–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiet, J. O. and M. Samuelsson, 2000. ‚Knowledge-Based Competencies as a Platform for Firm Formation’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College, 166–178

  • Friedman, D. and S. Sunder, 1994. Experimental Methods, Cambridge University Press, Chapters 1 and 2

  • Gaglio, C. M., 1997. ‚Opportunity Identification: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions’, in J. Katz (ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3: 139–202

  • Gilad B., Kaish S., Ronen J. (1988). The Entrepreneurial Way with Information. in S. Maital (ed.). Applied Behavioral Economics, 11, Brighton, England: Wheatshaef Books, Ltd pp. 480–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammonds, K. H., 2001. Michael Porter’s Big Ideas, Boston: Fast Company

  • Hayek F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35: 519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschleifer J. (1970). Investment, Interest, and Capital. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschleifer J. (1971). The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Innovative Behavior. American Economic Review 61(4): 561–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschleifer J. (1973). Where Are We in the Theory of Information?. American Economic Review 63(2): 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1992). Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure. in L. Werin, H. Wijkander (eds.), Contract Economics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., 1982. ‚Truthful Disclosure of Information’, Bell Journal of Economics Spring, 36–44

  • Kagel, J. H. and A. H. Roth (eds.), 1995. The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

  • Kaish S., Gilad B. (1991). Characteristics of Opportunities Search of Entrepreneurs Versus Executives: Sources, Interests, General Alertness. Journal of Business Venturing 6: 45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press pp 67–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I. (1979). Perception, Opportunity, and Profit: Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press pp 142–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I. (1985). Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I. (1992). The Meaning of Market Process: Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. London, NY: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 60–85

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMinn R. D. (1980). Search and Market Equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy 88(2): 308–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs J., Roth A. E. (1989). An Experimental Study of Sequential Bargaining. American Economic Review, 79: 355–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Palich L., Bagby R. (1995). Using Cognitive Theory to Explain Entrepreneurial Risk Taking: Challenging Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing 10: 425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research. McGraw Hill. Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth A. E. (1988). Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: A Methodological Overview. Economic Journal, 98: 974–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth A. E. (1995). Introduction to Experimental Economics. In J. H. Kagel, A. E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth A. E. (2002). The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics. Econometrica 70: 1341–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank R. C. (1975). Conceptual Information Processing. American Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish W., Cook T., Campbell D. (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimetnal Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane S. (2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunity. Organization Science 11: 448–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. and J. Eckhardt, 2003. ‚The Individual-Opportunity Nexus’, in Zoltan Acs and David Audretsch (eds.), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers

  • Shane S., Venkataraman S. (2000). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review 25: 217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith V. L. (1976). Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory. American Economic Review, 66: 274–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V. L. (1989). Theory, Experiment and Economic. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1): 151–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V. L. (1994).Economics in the Laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1): 113–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G. J. (1961). The Economics of Information. Journal of Political Economy 69(3): 213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J. E. (1985). Information and Economic Analysis: A Perspective. Economic Journal 95: 21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman S. (1997). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship: An Editor’s Perspective. In J. Katz, R. Brockhaus (eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, New York: JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman D., Hayes-Roth F. (1978). Pattern-Directed Inference Systems, Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James O. Fiet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiet, J.O., Patel, P.C. Entrepreneurial Discovery as Constrained, Sytematic Search. Small Bus Econ 30, 215–229 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9010-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9010-5

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation