SpringerLink
Log in

The Nature of Science as Represented in Chemistry Textbooks Used in Nigeria

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of science education in many countries is varied and diverse. However, one common goal of science education in the different contexts is the focus on scientific literacy. To promote scientific literacy, the Nature of Science (NoS) is one of the vital components for raising scientifically literate citizens. In view of this, the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA 2000) proposed that all those who are involved in science teaching and learning should have a common view of the NoS. In Nigeria, this view is interpreted to have informed the stronger advocacy for students to develop an understanding of the scientific enterprise as articulated in the nation’s policy document and revised science curricular. Therefore, this study aims to examine how NoS is represented in three Nigerian chemistry textbooks. The study draws from the NSTA document and literature—the analytical framework for the representations of NoS aspects, approaches used, and the content relation of NoS in the textbooks. Though comparatively few, the results indicated that NoS aspects of tentativeness, empirical nature, human endeavor, creativity, and imagination were the most cited in all the three textbooks. NoS aspects of theories and laws, subjectivity, and scientific methods were less mentioned, while the interdisciplinary nature of science, use of models, and science as a solitary pursuit were neglected in about two thirds of the textbooks. The results further revealed the dominance of implicit approach, followed by the historical approach used to integrate a few NoS aspects in the textbooks. The content relation of the NoS aspects were more of content-embeddedness than content-generic. Following these results, we conclude that the analyzed textbooks may not be adequate to promote scientific literacy in their present states but have the potential to contribute to scientific literacy among students; if revised to reflect recommendations, this study adds to existing literature on NoS representations in science textbooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ababio, O. Y. (2012). New school chemistry. Onitsha: Africana-FEP.

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Rutherford’s enlarged: a content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science. Physics Education, 37(1), 64–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). The evolving landscape related to assessment of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd Ed.) (pp. 621–650). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). The influence of the history of science courses on students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 1057–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Myers, J. Y., Summers, R., Brunner, J., Waight, N., Wahbeh, N., Zeineddin, A. A., & Belarmino, J. (2017). A longitudinal analysis of the extent and manner of representations of nature of science in U.S. high school biology and physics textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 82–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abimbola, I. O. (2009). Scientific literacy and the African worldview: Implications for sustainable development of science education in Africa. In K. Opoko-Agyemang (Ed.), Culture, science and sustainable development in Africa (pp. 344–362). Cape Coast: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Hanson, D. L., & Cullen, T. A. (2007). The influence of guided inquiry and explicit instruction on K-6 teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 751–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9065-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2010). Exploring the nature of science: Using the atlas of scientific literacy and other education resources from AAAS project 2061. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/guides/science.pdf.

  • Aydin, S., & Tortumlu, S. (2015). The analysis of the changes in integration of nature of science into Turkish high school chemistry textbooks: is there any development? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 786–796. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00073d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, S., Demirdöğen, B., Muslu, N., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2013). Professional journals as a source of PCK for teaching nature of science: An examination of articles published in the science teacher (an NSTA Journal) 1996–2010. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 977–997.

  • Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. (2002). Science instruction in middle and secondary school (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1991). A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 939–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 787–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2009). Exploring international perspectives of scientific literacy: an overview of the special issue. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93, 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus non-integrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2004). The nature of science and scientific inquiry. In G. Venville & V. Dawson (Eds.), The art of science teaching (pp. 2–17). Allen & Unwin, Australia.

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., & Chen, C. (2002). Promoting pre-service chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 41–52). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C. V., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (Eds.). (2017). Representations of nature of science in school science textbooks: a global perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D., & Kearton, G. (2010). What do researchers say about scientific literacy in schools?

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. (2011). A new framework for K–12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. (An NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

  • National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (2000). NSTA position statement on the nature of science. Retrieved June 14, 2016, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/natureofscience.aspx.

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011). Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council [NERDC]. (2009). Senior secondary education curriculum. Chemistry for SS1-3. Lagos: NERDC Press.

  • Odesina, I. A. (2015). Essential chemistry for senior secondary schools. Onitsha: Africana-FEP. 

  • Ohia, G. N., Amasiatu, G. I., Ajagbe, J. O., Ojokuku, G. O., & Mohammed, U. (2007). Comprehensive certificate chemistry. Onitsha: Africana-FEP.

  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ideas-about-science should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardag, M., Aydın, S., Kalender, N., Tortumlu, N., Çiftçi, M., & Perihanoglu, S. (2014). The integration of nature of science in the new secondary physics, chemistry, and biology curricula. Education and Science, 39, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science and Learning Expert Group. (Feb, 2010). Science and mathematics secondary education for the 21st century (HMSO). Retrieved 16th October, 2016 from www.interactive.bis.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/.../learning/...new-science-and-learning-expert-group-report/

  • Upahi, J. E., Gbadamosi, R., & Boniface, V. E. (2017). Scientific literacy themes coverage in the Nigerian senior school chemistry curriculum. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(2), 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesterinen, V.-M., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2013). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in Nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science and Education, 22, 1839–1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Prof. I. O. Abimbola for his tremendous assistance and comments that helped refine our thoughts in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science and Technology Education, Faculty of Education, University of Johannesburg, Kingsway Avenue, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Johnson Enero Upahi & Umesh Ramnarain

  2. Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria

    Johnson Enero Upahi & Ismail Saheed Ishola

Authors
  1. Johnson Enero Upahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Umesh Ramnarain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ismail Saheed Ishola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johnson Enero Upahi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Upahi, J.E., Ramnarain, U. & Ishola, I.S. The Nature of Science as Represented in Chemistry Textbooks Used in Nigeria. Res Sci Educ 50, 1321–1339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9734-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9734-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation