Abstract
The past two decades have been a period of far-reaching policy experimentation in state financing of higher education. Between 1986 and 1999, 21 states adopted prepaid college tuition plans. Thirty-one states adopted some form of college savings plan. Both kinds of policies were designed to enhance the affordability of higher education during a time of growing concern about college costs. Using event history analysis, we explore various factors leading to the programs’ adoption, paying particular to the role of policy privatization, electoral competition and timing, and certain system characteristics of higher education. We find that more liberal governments were more likely to adopt prepaid tuition plans, that states with more competitive elections were less likely to adopt any type of prepaid or savings plan, and that states with decentralized governance were more likely to adopt one of these kinds of policies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Within a short period of time following this change in the federal tax code advantaging contributions to the programs, all 50 states and the District of Columbia had created their own version of a prepaid tuition or savings program.
We collected information on the programs from a variety of extant sources, including Roth (1999) and Baird (2006). We then used Lexis–Nexis to search, within each state’s statues, for the year of program adoption and for various other program characteristics to ensure consistency with our operationalized definitions for the policies described elsewhere in the manuscript.
References
Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Sage Publications.
Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2006). State higher education spending and the tax revolt. Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 618–644.
Baird, K. (2006). Do prepaid tuition plans affect state support for higher education? Journal of Education Finance, 31(3), 255–275.
Barrilleaux, C. (1997). A test of the independent influences of electoral competition and party strength in a model of state policy-making. American Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 1462–1466.
Barrilleaux, C., Holbrook, T. M., & Langer, L. (2002). Electoral competition, legislative balance, and American state welfare policy. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 415–427.
Berdahl, R. O. (1971). Statewide coordination of higher education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. The American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1992). Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 715–742.
Berry, W., Ringquist, E., Fording, R., & Hanson, R. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–1993. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 327–348.
Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior—vote-seeking, tax setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45.
Besley, T., & Case, A. (2002). Political institutions and policy choices. Institute for Fiscal Studies Working Papers, WP02/13.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (1997). Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 1414–1461.
Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Zorn, C. J. W. (2001). Duration models and proportional hazards in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 972–988.
Cohen-Vogel, L., Ingle, W. K., Levine, A. A., & Spence, M. (2008). The “spread” of merit-based college aid: Politics, policy consortia and interstate competition. Educational Policy, 22(3), 339–362.
Cox, D. (1972). Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B, 34, 187.
Dawson, R. E., & Robinson, J. A. (1963). Inter-party competition, economic variables, and welfare policies in the American states. Journal of Politics, 25(2), 265–289.
de Figueiredo, R. J. P. (2001). Electoral competition, political uncertainty and policy insulation. Institute for Governmental Studies Working Papers, 2001-7.
Desjardins, S. L. (2003). Event history methods: Conceptual issues and an application to student departure from college. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (p. 421).
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
Doyle, W. R. (2006). The adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(3), 259–285.
Dye, T. R. (1966a). Politics, economics and the public: Policy outcomes in the American states. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.
Dye, T. R. (1966b). Politics, economics and the public. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Dynarski, S. (2004). Who benefits from the education saving incentives? Income, educational expectations, and the value of the 529 and Coverdell. NBER Working Papers, 10470.
Ehrenberg, R. G. (2005). The perfect storm and the privatization of public higher education. Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (CHERI).
Elazar, D. (1966). American federalism: A view from the states. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C, Jr., & McIver, J. P. (1989). Political parties, public opinion, and state policy in the United States. The American Political Science Review, 83(3), 729–750.
Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C, Jr., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fernandez, R., & Rogerson, R. (1995). On the political economy of education subsidies. Review of economic studies, 62(2), 249.
Garand, J. C. (1985). Partisan change and shifting expenditure priorities in the American states, 1945–1978. American Politics Quarterly, 355–391.
Gormley, W. T. (1986). Regulatory issue networks in a federal system. Polity, 18, 595–620.
Hacker, J. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.
Haider-Markel, D. P., & Meier, K. J. (2003). Legislative victory, electoral uncertainty: Explaining outcomes in the battles over lesbian and gay civil rights. Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 671–690.
Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(2), 161–190.
Hearn, J. C., Griswold, C. P., & Marine, G. (1996). Region, resources, and reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 241–278.
Hearn, J. C., McLendon, M. K., & Mokher, C. (2008). Accounting for student success: An empirical analysis of the origins and spread of state student unit-record systems. Research in Higher Education, 50(1).
Holbrook, T. M., & van Dunk, E. (1993). Electoral competition in the American states. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 955–962.
Holmes, T. J. (1998). The effects of state policies on the location of industry: Evidence from state borders. Journal of Political Economy, 106(4), 667–705.
Hurley, J. (2003). The best way to save for college: A complete guide to 529 plans, 2003–2004. Pittsford: Savingforcollege.Com.
Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2002). The statistical analysis of failure time data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics in state and nation (1st ed.). New York: A. A. Knopf.
Klarner, C. (2003). The measurement of the partisan balance of state government. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 3(3).
Klingman, D., & Lammers, W. W. (1984). The “general policy liberalism” factor in American state politics. American Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 598–610.
Lehman, J. S. (1990). Social irresponsibility, actuarial assumptions, and wealth redistribution: Lessons about public policy from a prepaid tuition program. Michigan Law Review, 88, 1035–1141.
Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715.
Lowry, R. C. (2001). Governmental structure, trustee selection, and public university prices and spending. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 845–861.
Lyall, K., & Sell, K. R. (2006). The true genius of America at risk. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
McGuinness, A. C., Epper, R. M., & Arredondo, S. (1997). State postsecondary education structures handbook. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
McLendon, M. K. (2003a). The politics of higher education: Toward an expanded research agenda. Educational Policy, 17(1), 165–191.
McLendon, M. K. (2003b). State governance reform of higher education: Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVIII, pp. 57–143). London: Lower.
McLendon, M. K., Deaton, R., & Hearn, J. C. (2007). The enactment of state-level governance reforms for higher education: A test of the political-instability hypothesis. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 645–675.
McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1–24.
McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 363–400.
McLendon, M. K., & Mokher, C. G. (2009). The origins and growth of state policies that privatize public higher education. In Privatizing the public university: Perspectives from across the academy (pp. 7–32). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Meier, K. J. (1994). The politics of sin: Drugs, alcohol, and public policy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.
Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Political Science Review, 43(1), 738–770.
Mokher, C. G., & McLendon, M. K. (2009). Uniting secondary and postsecondary education: An event history analysis of state adoption of dual enrollment policies. American Journal of Education, 115(2), 249–277.
Mooney, C. Z. (2001). Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 103–124.
Mooney, C. Z., & Lee, M. H. (1999). Morality policy reinvention: State death penalties. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 566, 80–92.
Nelson, M. A. (2000). Electoral cycles and the politics of state tax policy. Public Finance Review, 28(6), 540–560.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169–190.
Olivas, M. A. (2003). State college savings and prepaid plans. Journal of Law and Education, 32(4), 475–514.
Reynolds, L. (2007) Politics and tuition: Evidence of a political budget cycle in higher education. Kent State University (unpublished manuscript).
Ripley, R. (1985). Policy analysis in political science. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80(1), 21–36.
Rom, M. C. (1999). Transforming state health and welfare programs. In V. Gray & H. Jacobs (Eds.), Congressional quarterly press. Washington, DC: Politics in the American States.
Roth, A. P. (1999). State-sponsored, tax-advantaged college savings plans: A study of their impact on contemporary understanding of the public-versus-private responsibility to pay for higher education issue. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Antonio, TX.
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2004). The diffusion of state-level anti-smoking policies. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 15–18, 2004.
Smith, K. (2004). The politics of punishment: A political model of punishment. The Journal of Politics, 66(3), 925–938.
Soss, J., Schram, S., Vartanian, T. P., & O’Brien, E. (2001). Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 378–395.
Stream, C. (1999). Health reform in the states. Political Research Quarterly, 52(3), 499–525.
Tandberg, D. A. (2006). State-level higher education interest group alliances. Higher Education in Review, 3, 25–49.
Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000). Modeling survival data: Extending the Cox model. Springer.
Thomas, S. (2000). The ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591–615.
Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899.
Yates, J., & Fording, R. (2005). Politics and state punitiveness in black and white. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1099–1121.
Zumeta, W. (1996). Meeting the demand for higher education without breaking the bank. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(4), 367–425.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the participants at the Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual meeting seminar, including James Fairweather, for their comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doyle, W.R., McLendon, M.K. & Hearn, J.C. The Adoption of Prepaid Tuition and Savings Plans in the American States: An Event History Analysis. Res High Educ 51, 659–686 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9173-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9173-4