Abstract
Pituitary adenohypophyseal tumors are considered as benign and termed “adenomas”. However, many tumors are invasive and a proportion of these exhibit an “aggressive behavior” with premature death due to progressive growth. Only very rare (0.2%) tumors with metastases are considered malignant and termed “carcinomas”. Taking into account this variability in behavior and the oncological definition, pathologists have proposed changing the term adenoma to tumor. Here we explain why use the term tumor instead of adenoma and identify tumor characteristics, associated with a high risk for poor prognosis. In a cohort of 125 tumors with aggressive behavior (APT) and 40 carcinomas with metastases (PC), clinical and pathological features were very similar. The comparison of this cohort (APT+PC) with a reference surgical cohort of 374 unselected patients clearly shows that the two cohorts differ greatly, especially the percentage of tumors with Ki67 ≥ 10% (35%vs3%; p < 0.001). A five-tiered prognostic classification, associating invasion and proliferation, identified grade 2b tumors (invasive and proliferative), with a high risk of recurrence/progression. Because half of the APT+ PC tumors have a Ki67 index ≥10%, and 80% of them show 2 or 3 positive markers of proliferation, we suggest that tumors that are clinically aggressive, invasive and highly proliferative with a Ki67 ≥ 10%, represent tumors with malignant potential. The percentage of grade 2b tumors, suspected of malignancy, which will become aggressive tumors or carcinomas is unknown. It is probably very low, but higher than 0.2% in surgical series. Early identification and active treatment of these aggressive tumors is needed to decrease morbidity and prolong survival.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11154-020-09562-9/MediaObjects/11154_2020_9562_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aflorei ED, Korbonits M. Epidemiology and etiopathogenesis of pituitary adenomas. J Neuro-Oncol. 2014;117:379–94.
Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A. High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the province of Liege, Belgium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4769–75.
Fernandez A, Karavitaki N, Wass JAH. Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK). Clin Endocrinol. 2010;72:377–82.
Asa SL, Casar-Borota O, Chanson P, Delgrange E, Earls P, Ezzat S, et al. From pituitary adenoma to pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET): an international pituitary pathology Club proposal. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24:C5–8.
McCormack A, Dekkers OM, Petersenn S, Popovic V, Trouillas J, Raverot G, et al. Treatment of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas: results of a European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) survey 2016. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:265–76.
Trouillas J, Burman P, McCormack A, Petersenn S, Popovic V, Dekkers O, et al. Aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas: two sides of the same coin? Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:C7–9.
Osamura RY, Grossman A, Korbonits M, Kovacs K, Lopes MBS, Matsuno A, et al. Pituitary adenoma. In chapter 1: Tumours of the pituitary gland. In: Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J, editors. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2017. p. 14–8.
Rindi G, Klimstra DS, Abedi-Ardekani B, Asa SL, Bosman FT, Brambilla E, et al. A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1770–86.
Yang Q, Li X. Molecular network basis of invasive pituitary adenoma: a review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00657.
Neou M, Villa C, Armignacco R, Jouinot A, Raffin-Sanson M-L, Septier A, et al. Pangenomic classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:123–34.
Asioli S, Righi A, Iommi M, Baldovini C, Ambrosi F, Guaraldi F, et al. Validation of a clinicopathological score for the prediction of post-surgical evolution of pituitary adenoma: retrospective analysis on 566 patients from a tertiary care Centre. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;180:127–34.
Tortosa F, Webb SM. Atypical pituitary adenomas: 10 years of experience in a reference Centre in Portugal. Neurologia. 2016;31:97–105.
Jaffrain-Rea ML, Di Stefano D, Minniti G, Esposito V, Bultrini A, Ferretti E, et al. A critical reappraisal of MIB-1 labelling index significance in a large series of pituitary tumours: secreting versus non-secreting adenomas. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2002;9:103–13.
Meij BP, Lopes M-BS, Ellegala DB, Alden TD, Laws ER. The long-term significance of microscopic dural invasion in 354 patients with pituitary adenomas treated with transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:195–208.
Zada G, Woodmansee WW, Ramkissoon S, Amadio J, Nose V, Laws ER. Atypical pituitary adenomas: incidence, clinical characteristics, and implications. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:336–44.
Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N, Dantony E, Cortet-Rudelli C, Viennet G, et al. A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126:123–35.
Raverot G, Dantony E, Beauvy J, Vasiljevic A, Mikolasek S, Borson-Chazot F, et al. Risk of recurrence in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective study using a five-tiered classification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:3368–74.
Petrossians P, Daly AF, Natchev E, Maione L, Blijdorp K, Sahnoun-Fathallah M, et al. Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) database. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24:505–18.
Tampourlou M, Ntali G, Ahmed S, Arlt W, Ayuk J, Byrne JV, et al. Outcome of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas that regrow after primary treatment: a study from two large UK centers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:1889–97.
Casanueva FF, Barkan AL, Buchfelder M, Klibanski A, Laws ER, Loeffler JS, et al. Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): a pituitary society statement. Pituitary. 2017;20:489–98.
Ho KKY, Fleseriu M, Wass J, van der Lely A, Barkan A, Giustina A, et al. The tale in evolution: clarity, consistency and consultation, not contradiction and confusion. Pituitary. 2019;22:569–73.
Di Ieva A, Rotondo F, Syro LV, Cusimano MD, Kovacs K. Aggressive pituitary adenomas--diagnosis and emerging treatments. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:423–35.
Zemmoura I, Wierinckx A, Vasiljevic A, Jan M, Trouillas J, François P. Aggressive and malignant prolactin pituitary tumors: pathological diagnosis and patient management. Pituitary. 2013;16:515–22.
Lin AL, Sum MW, DeAngelis LM. Is there a role for early chemotherapy in the management of pituitary adenomas? Neuro-oncology. 2016;18:1350–6.
McCormack AI, Wass JAH, Grossman AB. Aggressive pituitary tumours: the role of temozolomide and the assessment of MGMT status. Eur J Clin Investig. 2011;41:1133–48.
Chatzellis E, Alexandraki KI, Androulakis II, Kaltsas G. Aggressive pituitary tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;101:87–104.
Dworakowska D, Grossman AB. Aggressive and malignant pituitary tumours: state-of-the-art. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018;25:R559–75.
Raverot G, Burman P, McCormack A, Heaney A, Petersenn S, Popovic V, et al. European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:G1–24.
Kasuki L, Raverot G. Definition and diagnosis of aggressive pituitary tumors. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-019-09531-x.
Lelotte J, Mourin A, Fomekong E, Michotte A, Raftopoulos C, Maiter D. Both invasiveness and proliferation criteria predict recurrence of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas after surgery: a retrospective analysis of a monocentric cohort of 120 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178:237–46.
Serioli S, Doglietto F, Fiorindi A, Biroli A, Mattavelli D, Buffoli B, et al. Pituitary adenomas and invasiveness from anatomo-surgical, radiological, and histological perspectives: a systematic literature review. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121936.
Amar AP, Hinton DR, Krieger MD, Weiss MH. Invasive pituitary adenomas: significance of proliferation parameters. Pituitary. 1999;2:117–22.
Minniti G, Jaffrain-Rea M-L, Esposito V, Santoro A, Tamburrano G, Cantore G. Evolving criteria for post-operative biochemical remission of acromegaly: can we achieve a definitive cure? An audit of surgical results on a large series and a review of the literature. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2003;10:611–9.
Micko ASG, Wöhrer A, Wolfsberger S, Knosp E. Invasion of the cavernous sinus space in pituitary adenomas: endoscopic verification and its correlation with an MRI-based classification. J Neurosurg. 2015;122:803–11.
Trouillas J, Girod C, Claustrat B, Joly-Pharaboz MO, Chevallier P. Spontaneous prolactin transplantable tumor in the Wistar/Furth rat (SMtTW): a new animal model of human prolactinoma. Cancer Res. 1990;50:4081–6.
Daniel L, Trouillas J, Renaud W, Chevallier P, Gouvernet J, Rougon G, et al. Polysialylated-neural cell adhesion molecule expression in rat pituitary transplantable tumors (spontaneous mammotropic transplantable tumor in Wistar-Furth rats) is related to growth rate and malignancy. Cancer Res. 2000;60:80–5.
Wierinckx A, Auger C, Devauchelle P, Reynaud A, Chevallier P, Jan M, et al. A diagnostic marker set for invasion, proliferation, and aggressiveness of prolactin pituitary tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007;14:887–900.
Raverot G, Wierinckx A, Dantony E, Auger C, Chapas G, Villeneuve L, et al. Prognostic factors in prolactin pituitary tumors: clinical, histological, and molecular data from a series of 94 patients with a long postoperative follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1708–16.
Lloyd RV, Kovacs K, Young WF. Pitutary tumours: Introduction. In chapter 1: Tumours of pituitary. WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. Delellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, Eng C. Eds. IARC. Lyon; 2004. pp 10–13.
Miermeister CP, Petersenn S, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Lüdecke DK, Hölsken A, et al. Histological criteria for atypical pituitary adenomas - data from the German pituitary adenoma registry suggests modifications. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3:50.
Chiloiro S, Doglietto F, Trapasso B, Iacovazzo D, Giampietro A, Di Nardo F, et al. Typical and atypical pituitary adenomas: a single-center analysis of outcome and prognosis. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;101:143–50.
Saeger W, Lüdecke DK, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Quabbe H-J, Petersenn S. Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German pituitary tumor registry. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156:203–16.
Lv L, Hu Y, Yin S, Wang M, Zhou P, Zhang N, et al. Clinically aggressive phenotype: a clinicopathological case series of atypical pituitary adenomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;167:93–8.
Yildirim AE, Divanlioglu D, Nacar OA, Dursun E, Sahinoglu M, Unal T, et al. Incidence, hormonal distribution and postoperative follow up of atypical pituitary adenomas. Turk Neurosurg. 2013;23:226–31.
Del Basso De Caro M, Solari D, Pagliuca F, Villa A, Guadagno E, Cavallo LM, et al. Atypical pituitary adenomas: clinical characteristics and role of ki-67 and p53 in prognostic and therapeutic evaluation. A series of 50 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40:105–14.
Thapar K, Kovacs K, Scheithauer BW, Stefaneanu L, Horvath E, Pernicone PJ, et al. Proliferative activity and invasiveness among pituitary adenomas and carcinomas: an analysis using the MIB-1 antibody. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:99–106 discussion 106-107.
Scheithauer BW, Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, Kovacs KT, Young WF, Lloyd RV. Pituitary carcinoma: a clinicopathological review. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:1066–74 discussion 1066-1074.
Scheithauer BW, Gaffey TA, Lloyd RV, Sebo TJ, Kovacs KT, Horvath E, et al. Pathobiology of pituitary adenomas and carcinomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:341–53 discussion 341-353.
Kaltsas GA, Nomikos P, Kontogeorgos G, Buchfelder M, Grossman AB. Clinical review: diagnosis and management of pituitary carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:3089–99.
Roncaroli F, Kovacs K, Lloyd RV, Matsuno A, Righi A. Pituitary carcinoma: In Chapter 1: Tumours of pituitary gland. In: Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J, editors. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2017. p. 36–9.
Hirohata T, Asano K, Ogawa Y, Takano S, Amano K, Isozaki O, et al. DNA mismatch repair protein (MSH6) correlated with the responses of atypical pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas to temozolomide: the national cooperative study by the Japan Society for Hypothalamic and Pituitary Tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1130–6.
Bengtsson D, Daa Schrøder H, Andersen M, Maiter D, Berinder J, Feldt Rasmussen U, et al. Long-term outcome and MGMT as a predictive marker in 24 patients with atypical pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas given treatment with Temozolomide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:1689–98.
Villa C, Vasiljevic A, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Ansorge O, Asioli S, Barresi V, et al. A standardised diagnostic approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs): a European pituitary pathology group (EPPG) proposal. Virchows Arch. 2019;475:687–92.
Abushamat LA, Kerr JM, Lopes MBS, Kleinschmidt-Demasters BK. Very unusual sellar/suprasellar region masses: a review. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019;78:673–84.
Castellnou S, Vasiljevic A, Lapras V, Raverot V, Alix E, Borson-Chazot F, et al. SST5 expression and USP8 mutation in functioning and silent corticotroph pituitary tumors. Endocr Connect. 2020;9:243–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
In this review, there is no problem with ethical standards and the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trouillas, J., Jaffrain-Rea, ML., Vasiljevic, A. et al. Are aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas two sides of the same coin? Pathologists reply to clinician’s questions. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 21, 243–251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-020-09562-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-020-09562-9