Abstract
This paper derives an analytic closed-form formula for the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the composite error of the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) model. Since the presence of a cdf is frequently encountered in the likelihood-based analysis with limited-dependent and qualitative variables as elegantly shown in the classic book of Maddala (Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983), the proposed methodology is useful in the framework of the stochastic frontier analysis. We apply the formula to the maximum likelihood estimation of the SFA models with a censored dependent variable. The simulations show that the finite sample performance of the maximum likelihood estimator of the censored SFA model is very promising. A simple empirical example on the modeling of reservation wage in Taiwan is illustrated as a potential application of the censored SFA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the experiments, we estimate \( \xi \) with the following transformation function: \( \xi = \left( {\beta_{0} ,\beta_{1} ,\sigma_{u} ,\sigma_{v} } \right)^{\text{T}} = \kappa \left( {\tilde{\xi }} \right) \), where \( \tilde{\xi } = \left( {\beta_{0} ,\beta_{1} ,\ln \left( {\sigma_{u} } \right),\ln \left( {\sigma_{v} } \right)} \right)^{\text{T}} \) are the parameters actually estimated when conducting the MLE of the censored and uncensored SFA.
The GAUSS program for the censored SFA is available upon request from the authors.
More precisely, the initial value of \( \tilde{\xi } \) is set to be \( \tilde{\xi }_{0} = \kappa (\tilde{\xi })^{ - 1} + N(0,1) \).
References
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1970) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover, New York
Aigner D, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and Estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–37
Amemiya T (1985) Advanced econometrics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Amsler C, Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2011) Using copulas to model time dependence in stochastic frontier models. Working Paper, Michigan State University
Greene WH (2010) A stochastic frontier model with correction for sample selection. J Prod Anal 34:15–24
Hofler RA, Murphy KJ (1992) Underpaid and overworked: measuring the effects of imperfect information on wages. Econ Inquiry 30:511–529
Hofler RA, Murphy KJ (1994) Estimating reservation wages of workers using a stochastic frontier. South Econ J 60:961–976
Lai H, Huang CJ (2011) Maximum likelihood estimation of seemingly unrelated stochastic frontier regressions. Working Paper, National Chung Cheng University
Maddala GS (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Olson JA, Schmidt P, Waldman DM (1980) A Monte Carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions. J Econ 13:67–82
Park TA, Lohr L (2007) Performance evaluation of university providers: a frontier approach for ordered response data. Eur J Oper Res 182:899–910
Polachek SW, Robst J (1998) Employee labor market information: comparing direct world of work measures of workers’ knowledge to stochastic frontier estimates. Labour Econ 5:231–242
Roy AD (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxf Econ Pap 3:135–146
Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 26:24–36
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Editor, Professor Sickles, and two anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. The research described in this paper was conducted in part while the second author was a visiting scholar at the Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica. The financial support from the National Science Council of Taiwan is also gratefully acknowledged. The usual disclaimer applies. We also thank for the excellent research assistance of Shih-Tang Hwu.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
This appendix shows the derivation of the approximated cumulative distribution function F app . Since \( a = \frac{\lambda }{\sigma } \ge 0 \), we divide the derivation into two parts: for \( \left( {Q \le 0,a \ge 0} \right) \) and \( \left( {Q \ge 0,a \ge 0} \right) \). Furthermore, for ease of exposition, two equations from Abramowitz and Stegun (1970, Eqs. 7.11 and 7.4.32) are given:
where C denotes a finite constant.
Given that \( \left( {Q,a,b} \right) \in \) finite R, \( b > 0,\,erf\left( { - x} \right) = - erf\left( x \right) \), and define \( \varepsilon = \sqrt 2 v/a \), we have:
Note that erf(z) can be well approximated by a function, \( g(x) = 1 - e^{{c_{1} x + c_{2} x^{2} }} \) for x ≥ 0, where c 1 and c 2 are chosen to ensure that g(x) is as close to erf(x) as possible. The choice of c 1 and c 2 is discussed in Sect. 2.
With the preceding results of \( I_{a \ge 0} \left( Q \right) \), we then have
when we use (7.4.32) of Abramowitz and Stegun (1970), \( I_{a \ge 0,Q \ge 0} \) can be approximated by:
Likewise, we can derive the approximation for \( I_{a \ge 0,Q \le 0} \):
Combining the preceding results, we prove the result in (12).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tsay, WJ., Huang, C.J., Fu, TT. et al. A simple closed-form approximation for the cumulative distribution function of the composite error of stochastic frontier models. J Prod Anal 39, 259–269 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0283-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0283-1