Abstract
This sco** literature review of nearly 5,000 peer-reviewed articles from myriad disciplines examines usage of two sets of terms that are common to many researchers, but arcane to many practitioners. Aiming to inform researchers about how scholarly literature that invokes these terms might speak to practitioners, and resulting implications for practice, we review scholarly use of three practice designations (promising, evidence-based, best) and five cultural considerations for those practices (adaptation, competence, modification, responsiveness, specificity). In addition to sco** review methods, we apply social cartography and definitional traces. Findings drive our contention that “promising practice” is the designation that might provide practitioners with the most utility, rather than the frequent—often-unarticulated—uses of best and evidence-based. Likewise, we find copious evidence of cultural considerations being invoked without operationalization. Social cartography reveals few international partnerships and limited domestic leadership among ‘leading’ research institutions regarding the intersection of practice designations and cultural considerations. Themes from the definitional trace prompt us to invite scholarly debate about a ladder from ‘promising’ to ‘evidence-based’ to ‘best’ and to prompt researchers’ efforts to transfer knowledge to practitioners.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Recognizing the litany of ways that culture can be defined, we regard culture, as grou**s of people whose identities—due to social construction and enculturation—can depend upon shared values, beliefs, and behavioral norms. Often used interchangeably with race and ethnicity, culture might connect more closely with ethnicity, which depends more on commonalities of nationality, lineage, and/or language rather than physiognomy (i.e., race).
All AAU institutions are also R1s, except for Canadian institutions: McGill University and University of Toronto.
References
Aarons, G. A., Sklar, M., Mustanski, B., Benbow, N., & Brown, C. H. (2017). “Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems. Implementation Science, 12, 111–123.
APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Sco** studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19–32.
Baumann, A. A., Powell, B. J., Kohl, P. L., Tabak, R. G., Penalba, V., Proctor, E. K., … & Cabassa, L. J. (2015). Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent training: A systematic review and critique of guiding evidence. Children and Youth Services Review, 53, 113–120.
Baumann, A., Cabassa, L., & Stirman, S. W. (2017). Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science. In R. Brownson, E. Proctor, & G. Colditz (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University.
Bernal, G. (2006). Intervention development and cultural adaptation research with diverse families. Family Process, 45, 143–151.
Bernal, G., & Domenech Rodríguez, M. (2012). Cultural adaptation in context: Psychotherapy as a historical account of adaptations. In G. Bernal & M. D. Rodríguez (Eds.), Cultural adaptations: Tools for evidence-based practice with diverse populations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bernal, G., & Scharró-del-Río, M. R. (2001). Are empirically supported treatments valid for ethnic minorities? Toward an alternative approach for treatment research. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7, 328–342.
Bretschneider, S., Marc-Aurele, F. J., Jr., & Wu, J. (2005). ‘Best practices’ Research: A methodological guide for the perplexed. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 307–323.
Briggs, H. E. (2009). The fusion of culture and science: Challenges and controversies of cultural competency and evidence-based practice with an African American family advocacy network. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1172–1179.
Brown, K., Waterhouse, J., & Flynn, C. (2003). Change management practices: Is a hybrid model a better alternative for public sector agencies? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16, 230–241.
Buckley, H., Tonmyr, L., Lewig, K., & Jack, S. (2014). Factors influencing the uptake of research evidence in child welfare: A synthesis of findings from Australia, Canada and Ireland. Child Abuse Review, 23, 5–16.
Cabassa, L. J., & Baumann, A. A. (2013). A two-way street: Bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implementation Science, 8, 90–103.
Cardemil, E. V. (2015). Evidence-based practice in a global context. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 22, 76–81.
Chambers, D. A., & Norton, W. E. (2016). The adaptome: Advancing the science of intervention adaptation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51, S124–S131.
Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science, 8, 117–127.
Chapman, M. V., Hall, W. J., & Sisler, L. A. (2014). Adapting an empirically supported intervention for a new population and setting: Findings and lessons learned from proyecto puentes. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11, 30–42.
Chorpita, B. F., Becker, K. D., Daleiden, E. L., & Hamilton, J. D. (2007). Understanding the common elements of evidence-based practice: Misconceptions and clinical examples. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 647–652.
Davis, D. A., & Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1997). Translating guidelines into practice: A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 157, 408–416.
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
Elliotson, J., Cooke, J. C., & Thompson, G. T. (1839). Lecture on the theory and practice of medicine. London: J. F. Moore.
Fishbein, D. H., & Dariotis, J. K. (2017). Personalizing and optimizing preventive intervention models via a translational neuroscience framework. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0851-8.
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., … & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.
Freelon, D. (2013). ReCal OIR: Ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 8, 10–16.
Gatzke-Kopp, L. M. (2016). Diversity and representation: Key issues for psychophysiological science: Diversity and representation. Psychophysiology., 53, 3–13.
Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., … & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: Next generation. Prevention Science, 16, 893–926.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108.
Hall, G. C. N., Ibaraki, A. Y., Huang, E. R., Marti, C. N., & Stice, E. (2016). A meta-analysis of cultural adaptations of psychological interventions. Behavior Therapy, 47, 993–1014.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies.
Jackson, K. F. (2009). Building cultural competence: A systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of culturally sensitive interventions with ethnic minority youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1192–1198.
Karatekin, C. (2014). A survey of organizations serving child welfare-involved families and children in Hennepin Co, MN. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 31, 197–235.
Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
Langhout, R. D., & Thomas, E. (2010). Imagining participatory action research in collaboration with children: An introduction. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46, 60–66.
Lau, A. S. (2006). Making the case for selective and directed cultural adaptations of evidence- based treatments: Examples from parent training. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 13, 295–310.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Sco** studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69–77.
Liebman, M., & Paulston, R. (1993). Social cartography: A new methodology for comparative studies. University of Pittsburgh, PA: Administrative and Policy Studies No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107–110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002).
Norcross, J. C., Beutler, L. E., & Levant, R. F. (2006). Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions. Washington, DC: APA.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2, 397–430.
Rousseau, D. M., & Gunia, B. C. (2015). Evidence-based practice: The psychology of EBP implementation. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 667–692.
Rumrill, P. D., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Merchant, W. R. (2010). Using sco** literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work, 35, 399–404.
Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473.
Sierra, G., Alarcón, R., Aguilar, C., & Bach, C. (2010). Definitional verbal patterns for semantic relation extraction. Probing Semantic Relations: Exploration and Identification in Specialized exts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. John Benjamins, 73–96.
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31, 15–21.
Smith, T. B., Domenech Rodríguez, M., & Bernal, G. (2011). Culture. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 166–175.
Soto, A., Smith, T. B., Griner, D., Domenech Rodríguez, M., & Bernal, G. (2018). Cultural adaptations and therapist multicultural competence: Two meta-analytic reviews. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74, 1907–1923.
Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L. A., Greenberg, M., Leaf, P., Brown, C. H., … & Hawkins, J. D. (2013). Addressing core challenges for the next generation of type 2 translation research and systems: The translation science to population impact (TSci Impact) framework. Prevention Science, 14,319–351.
Supplee, L. H., & Meyer, A. L. (2015). The intersection between prevention science and evidence-based policy: How the SPR evidence standards support human services prevention programs. Prevention Science, 16, 938–942.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., … & Kenny, M. (2016). A sco** review on the conduct and reporting of sco** reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16,15–24.
Trimble, J. E., Scharron-Del-Rio, M. R., & Hill, J. S. (2012). Cultural adaptations: Tools for evidence-based practice with diverse populations (pp. 45–67). Washington, DC: APA.
Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2018). The role of integrated knowledge translation in intervention research. Prevention Science, 19, 319–327.
Webb, M. B. (2018). Enhancing capacity for evidence-based policymaking: The role of economic evaluation standards. Prevention Science, 19, 391–395.
Whaley, A. L., & Davis, K. E. (2007). Cultural competence and evidence-based practice in mental health services. American Psychologist, 62, 563–574.
Whitbeck, L. B., Walls, M. L., & Welch, M. L. (2012). Substance abuse prevention in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38, 428–435.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thier, M., Martinez, C.R., Alresheed, F. et al. Cultural Adaptation of Promising, Evidence-Based, and Best Practices: a Sco** Literature Review. Prev Sci 21, 53–64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01042-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01042-0