Abstract
There are many mandated school-based programs to prevent adolescent alcohol and drug (AOD) use, but few are voluntary and take place outside of class time. This cluster randomized controlled trial evaluates CHOICE, a voluntary after-school program for younger adolescents, which reduced both individual- and school-level alcohol use in a previous pilot study. We evaluated CHOICE with 9,528 students from 16 middle schools. The sample was 51% female; 54% Hispanic, 17% Asian, 15% white, 9% multiethnic and 3% African American. Fifteen percent of students attended CHOICE. All students completed surveys on alcohol beliefs and use at baseline and 6–7 months later. We conducted intention-to-treat (ITT) school-level analyses and propensity-matched attender analyses. Lifetime alcohol use in the ITT analysis (i.e., school level) achieved statistical significance, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.70 and a NNT of 14.8. The NNT suggests that in a school where CHOICE was offered, 1 adolescent out of 15 was prevented from initiating alcohol use during this time period. Although not statistically significant (p = .20), results indicate that past month alcohol use was also lower in CHOICE schools (OR = 0.81; NNT = 45). Comparisons of attenders versus matched controls yielded results for lifetime use similar to school-wide effects (OR = 0.74 and NNT = 17.6). Initial results are promising and suggest that a voluntary after-school program that focuses specifically on AOD may be effective in deterring alcohol use among early adolescents; however, further research is needed as program effects were modest.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Approximately 3–5% of students used the Spanish survey version and less than 1% of students used the Korean survey version.
References
Afterschool Alliance. (2009). American after 3 pm: The most in-depth study of how America’s children spend their afternoons. Retrieved from http://www.afterschoolalliance.org/AA3_Full_Report.pdf
Agostinelli, G., & Grube, J. (2005). Effects of presenting heavy drinking norms on adolescents’ prevalence estimates, evaluative judgments, and perceived standards. Prevention Science, 6, 89–99.
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. (Vol. 07–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Baer, J. S., Garrett, S. B., Beadnell, B., Wells, E. A., & Peterson, P. L. (2007). Brief motivational intervention with homeless adolescents: Evaluating effects on substance use and service utilization. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 582–586.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barnett, N. P., Monti, P. M., & Wood, M. D. (2001). Motivational interviewing for alcohol-involved adolescents in the emergency room. In E. F. Wagner & H. B. Waldron (Eds.), Innovations in adolescent substance abuse interventions (pp. 143–168). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2000). Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 728–733.
Brown, S. A. (2001). Facilitating change for adolescent alcohol problems: A multiple options approach. In E. F. Wagner & H. B. Waldron (Eds.), Innovations in adolescent substance abuse intervention (pp. 169–187). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Brown, S. A., Anderson, K., Schulte, M. T., Sintov, N. D., & Frissell, K. C. (2005). Facilitating youth self-change through school-based intervention. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 1797–1810. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Chan, D. (2008). So why ask me? - Are self-report data really that bad?. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colby, S. M., Monti, P. M., Tevyaw, T. O., Barnett, N. P., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., et al. (2005). Brief motivational intervention for adolescent smokers in medical settings. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 865–874. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
D'Amico, E. J., & Edelen, M. (2007). Pilot test of CHOICE: A voluntary after school intervention for middle school youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 592–598.
D'Amico, E. J., & Fromme, K. (2002). Brief prevention for adolescent risk-taking behavior. Addiction, 97, 563–574.
D'Amico, E. J., & McCarthy, D. M. (2006). Escalation and initiation of younger adolescents’ substance use: The impact of perceived peer use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 481–487.
D'Amico, E. J., Ellickson, P. L., Wagner, E. F., Turrisi, R., Fromme, K., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., et al. (2005). Developmental considerations for substance use interventions from middle school through college. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 474–483.
D'Amico, E. J., Miles, J. N. V., Stern, S. A., & Meredith, L. S. (2008). Brief motivational interviewing for teens at risk of substance use consequences: A randomized pilot study in a primary care clinic. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 35, 53–61.
D'Amico, E. J., Chinman, M., Stern, A., & Wandersman, A. (2009). Community prevention handbook on adolescent substance abuse prevention and treatment. In C. Leukefeld, T. Gullotta, & M. S. Tindall (Eds.), Adolescent substance abuse: Evidence-based approaches to prevention and treatment (pp. 73–96). New York: Springer.
D'Amico, E. J., Green, H. D. J., Miles, J. N. V., Zhou, A. J., Tucker, J. A., Shih, R. A. (in press a). Voluntary after school alcohol and drug programs: If you build it right, they will come. Journal of Research on Adolescence.
D'Amico, E. J, Osilla, K. C., Stern, S. A. (in press b). Prevention and intervention in the school setting. In K. J. Sher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of substance use disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dennis, M., Titus, J. C., Diamond, G., Donaldson, J., Godley, S. H., Tims, F. M., et al. (2002). The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiment: Rationale, study design and analysis plans. Addiction, 97, 16–34.
Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
Ellickson, P. L., Bird, C. E., Orlando, M., Klein, D. J., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2003). Social context and adolescent health behavior: Does school-level smoking prevalence affect students’ subsequent smoking behavior? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 525–535.
Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Longshore, D. L. (2003). New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of Project ALERT in middle schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1830–1836.
Faden, V. B. (2006). Trends in initiation of alcohol use in the United States 1975 to 2003. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 30, 1011–1022.
Ferrari, T. M., Lekies, K. S., & Arnett, N. (2009). Opportunities matter: Exploring youth’s perspectives on their long-term participation in an urban 4-H youth development program. Journal of Youth Development, 4, 1–19.
Gosin, M., Marsiglia, F. F., & Hecht, M. L. (2003). Keepin’ it R.E.A.L.: A drug resistance curriculum tailored to the strengths and needs of pre-adolescents of the southwest. Journal of Drug Education, 33, 119–142.
Gottfredson, D. C., Cross, A. B., Wilson, D. M., Rorie, M., & Connell, N. (2010). Effects of participation in after-school programs for middle school students: A randomized trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 282–313.
Graham, J. W., Marks, G., & Hansen, W. B. (1991). Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 291–298.
Green, L. W. (2001). From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25, 165–178.
Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414–430.
Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15, 234–249.
Harvard Family Research Project. (2007). Findings from HFRP’s study of predictors of participation in out-of-school time activities: Fact sheet. Cambridge: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Hollis, J. F., Polen, M. R., Whitlock, E. P., Lichtenstein, E., Mullooly, J. P., Velicer, W. F., et al. (2005). Teen Reach: Outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial of a tobacco reduction program for teens seen in primary medical care. Pediatrics, 115, 981–989.
Horn, K., Dino, G., Hamilton, C., & Noerachmanto, N. (2007). Efficacy of an emergency department-based motivational teenage smoking intervention. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4, A08.
Johnson, R. A., & Hoffmann, J. P. (2000). Adolescent cigarette smoking in U.S. racial/ethnic subgroups: Findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 392–407.
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2009). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2008. Volume I: Secondary school students. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2010. Volume I: Secondary school students. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
Jones, B., Corbin, W., & Fromme, K. (2001a). A review of expectancy theory and alcohol consumption. Addiction, 16, 57–72.
Jones, B. T., Corbin, W., & Fromme, K. (2001b). Half full or half empty, the glass still does not satisfactorily quench the thirst for knowledge on alcohol expectancies as a mechanism of change. Addiction, 96, 1672–1674.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kandel, D. B., Kiros, G. E., Schaffran, C., & Hu, M. C. (2004). Racial/ethnic differences in cigarette smoking initiation and progression to daily smoking: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 128–135.
Kelly, A. B., & Lapworth, K. (2006). The HYP program–targeted motivational interviewing for adolescent violations of school tobacco policy. Preventive Medicine, 43, 466–471.
Kilmer, B., Burgdorf, J., D’Amico, E. J., Tucker, J. S., & Miles, J. N. V. (2011). A multi-site cost analysis of a school-based voluntary alcohol and drug prevention program. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(5), 823–832.
Lauver, S., Little, P. M. D., & Weiss, H. (2004). Moving beyond the barriers: Attracting and sustaining youth participation in out-of-school time programs. In Harvard Family Research Project (Ed.), Issues and opportunities in out-of-school time evaluation, vol. 6 (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Little, P. M. D., & Harris, E. (2003). A review of out-of-school time program quasi-experimental and experimental evaluation results. In Harvard Family Research Project (Ed.), Out-of-school time evaluation snapshot, vol. 1 (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Little, R., & Rubin, D. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
Little, P. M. D., Wimer, C., & Weiss, H. B. (2008). After school programs in the 21st century: Their potential and what it takes to achieve it. In Harvard Family Research Project (Ed.), Issues and opportunities in out-of-school time evaluation, vol. 10 (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Maisto, S. A., Carey, K. B., & Bradizza, C. M. (1999). Social learning theory. In K. E. Leonard & H. T. Blane (Eds.), Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism (pp. 106–163). New York: Guilford.
Mason, M. J., & Posner, A. (2009). Brief substance abuse treatment with urban adolescents: A translational research study. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 18, 193–206.
McCambridge, J., Slym, R. L., & Strang, J. (2008). Randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing compared with drug information and advice for early intervention among young cannabis users. Addiction, 103, 1809–1818.
McNeal, R. B., Jr., Hansen, W. B., Harrington, N. G., & Giles, S. M. (2004). How All Stars works: An examination of program effects on mediating variables. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 165–178.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Gwaltney, C. J., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D. J., et al. (2007). Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking. Addiction, 102, 1234–1243.
Moyers, T. B., Martin, T., Manuel, J. K., Miller, W. R., Ernst, D. (2010). Revised global scales: Motivational interviewing treatment integrity 3.1.1 (MITI 3.1.1). Retrieved from http://casaa.unm.edu/mimanuals.html
Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Neighbors, C., Lewis, M. A., Atkins, D. C., Jensen, M. M., Walter, T., Fossos, N., et al. (2010). Efficacy of web-based personalized normative feedback: A two-year randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 898–911. doi:10.1037/a0020766.
Orlando, M., Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., & Longshore, D. L. (2005). Mediation analysis of a school-based drug prevention program: Effects of Project ALERT. Prevention Science, 6, 35–46.
Peterson, P. L., Baer, J. S., Wells, E. A., Ginzler, J. A., & Garrett, S. B. (2006). Short-term effects of a brief motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and drug risk among homeless adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20, 254–264.
R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Raghunathan, T. E., Solenberger, P. W., van Hoewyk, J. (2002). IVEware: Imputation and variance estimation software userguide.
Ridgeway, G., McCaffrey, D., Morral, A. (2006). Twang: Toolkit for weighting and analysis of nonequivalent (Version 1.0-1). http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/twang.html
Rollnick, S., Miller, W. R., & Butler, C. C. (2008). Motivational interviewing in health care: Hel** patients change behavior. New York: Guilford.
SAMHSA. (2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies.
SAS Institute. (2008). SAS 9.2 help and documentation. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
Shillington, A. M., & Clapp, J. D. (2000). Self-report stability of adolescent substance use: Are there differences for gender, ethnicity and age? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 60, 19–27.
Spirito, A., Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Colby, S. M., Sindelar, H., Rohsenow, D., et al. (2004). A randomized clinical trial of a brief motivational intervention for alcohol-positive adolescents treated in an emergency department. Journal of Pediatrics, 145, 396–402.
St. Pierre, T. L., Kaltreider, D. L., Mark, M. M., & Aikin, K. J. (1992). Drug prevention in a community setting: A longitudinal study of the relative effectiveness of a three-year primary prevention program in boys & girls clubs across the nation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 673–706.
Sterling, S., Weisner, C., Hinman, A., & Parthasarathy, S. (2010). Access to treatment for adolescents with substance use and co-occurring disorders: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 637–646.
Wagner, E. F., Tubman, J. G., & Gil, A. G. (2004). Implementing school-based substance abuse interventions: Methodological dilemmas and recommended solutions. Addiction, 99, 106–119.
Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58, 441–448.
WestEd. (2008). California Healthy Kids Survey. Available at: www.wested.org/hks
Wu, P., Hoven, C. W., Tiet, Q., Kovalenko, P., & Wicks, J. (2002). Factors associated with adolescent utilization of alcohol treatment services. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 28, 353–369.
Zief, S. G., Lauver, S., Maynard, R. (2006). The impacts of after-school programs on student outcomes: A systematic review for the Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Systematic Reviews: www.campbellcollaboration.org: Campbell Corporation.
Acknowledgements
Work on this article was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA016577) to Elizabeth D’Amico. The authors wish to thank the districts and schools who participated and supported this project. We would also like to thank Kirsten Becker and Megan Zander-Cotugno for overseeing the survey administrations at the 16 schools. We thank the eight facilitators for implementing CHOICE in the schools (Dionne Barnes, Erin dela Cruz, Blanca Dominguez, Mary Lou Gilbert, Marcia Gillis, Robert Reaugh, Jimmy Rodriguez and Stefanie Stern) and we thank Karen Osilla, Jennifer Parker and Qiana Montazeri for their help with coding adherence and MI of the CHOICE sessions. Finally, we thank Michael Woodward for his help and creativity in develo** the CHOICE logo and our project materials.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Amico, E.J., Tucker, J.S., Miles, J.N.V. et al. Preventing Alcohol Use with a Voluntary After-School Program for Middle School Students: Results from a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of CHOICE. Prev Sci 13, 415–425 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0269-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0269-7