Abstract
Landslide is one of natural hazards in mountainous regions, which has resulted in a large quantity of casualties and property losses and also has absorbed high attention of the researchers and government. A considerable amount of research has been carried out in the past 30 years in the landslide field. In this paper, the contribution and existing problems on landslide are analyzed and summarized in the previous studies. Spatial prediction and zonation of the regional landslide are developed by using information content model that is a new method, with the example of landslide in **ncheng District of Badong County. On the other hand, by learning from the forecast theories and methods of earthquake forecast, probability of excess for landslide that will take place in the studied area is calculated quantitatively in next 5 and 10 years. All the calculated results are mainly accordant with the regional fact. Therefore, it may provide scientific data for landslide prevention and reduction as well as landslide management. Based on the achievement obtained in this study, it was found that 29.11% of the total area was prone to landslide due to the adverse effects of topography, reservoir water in the leading edge of bank, and improper land use. At the same time, the theory of spatial prediction and probability of excess will be example and reference for the other region of China or the world.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-011-9756-1/MediaObjects/11069_2011_9756_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-011-9756-1/MediaObjects/11069_2011_9756_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-011-9756-1/MediaObjects/11069_2011_9756_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11069-011-9756-1/MediaObjects/11069_2011_9756_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akgun A, Turk N (2010) Landslide susceptibility map** for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis. Environ Earth Sci 61:595–611
Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility map** for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54:1127–1143
Bertolini G, Guida M, Pizziolo M (2005) Landslides in Emilia Romagna region (Italy): strategies for hazard assessment and risk management. Landslides 2:302–312
Chen ZH, Wang JF (2007) Landslide hazard map** using logistic regression model in Mackenzie Valley, Canada. Nat Hazards 42:75–89
Chen Y, Liu J, Chen QF (1999) Seismic hazard analysis and disaster prediction. Earthquake Press
Corominas J, Copons R, Vilaplana JM et al (2003) Integrated landslide susceptibility analysis and hazard assessment in the principality of Andorra. Nat Hazards 30:421–435
Falaschi F, Giacomelli F, Federici PR et al (2009) Logistic regression versus artificial neural networks: landslide susceptibility evaluation in a sample area of the Serchio River valley, Italy. Nat Hazards 50:551–569
Fernandez T, Irigaaray C, Elhamdouni R et al (2003) Methodology for landslide Susceptibility map** by means of a GIS. Application to the contraviesa area (Granada, Spain). Nat Hazards 30:297–308
Gorsevski PV, Gessler PE, Jankowski P (2003) Integrating a fuzzy k-means classification and a Bayesian approach for spatial prediction of landslide hazard. J Geogr Sys 5:223–251
Hong Y, Adler R, Huffman G (2007) Use of satellite remote sensing data in the map** of global landslide susceptibility. Nat Hazards 43:245–256
Lee S, Dan NT (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility map** in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environ Geol 48:778–787
Ozdemir A (2009) Landslide susceptibility map** of vicinity of Yaka Landslide (Gelendost, Turkey) using conditional probability approach in GIS. Environ Geol 57:1675–1686
Pandey A, Dabral PP, Chowdary VM et al (2008) Landslide hazard zonation using Remote Sensing and GIS:a case study of Dikrong river basin, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Environ Geol 54:1517–1529
Trigila A, Iadanza C, Spizzichino D (2010) Quality assessment of the Italian Landslide Inventory using GIS processing. Landslides 1–16
Vahidnia MH, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A et al. (2009) Design and development of an intelligent extension for map** landslide susceptibility using artificial neural network. ICCSA, Part I, LNCS 5592, pp 17–32
Vanwesten CJ, Rengers N, Soeters R (2003) Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Nat Hazards 30:399–419
Vijith H, Rejith PG, Madhu G (2009) Using infoVal method and GIS techniques for the spatial modelling of landslide susceptibility in the upper catchment of River Meenachil in Kerala. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37:241–250
Wang WD, ** based on geographical information system, GuiZhou, south-west China. Environ Geol 58:33–43
**ang XQ (2005) Regional landslide hazard assessment and risk management. PHD Dissertation of Chengdu University of Technology
**e QM, Liu P, **a YY (2004) Study on risk evaluation of landslide hazard. Metal Mine 3:58–61
Yin YP (2002) Geohazards and their prevention in resettlement areas of emigrant from the reservoir region of the Three Gorges Project. Geol Bull China 21(12):876–880
Yin KL (2004) Landslide hazard prediction and evaluation[M]. China University of Geoscience Press, Wuhan
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50874080) and Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (No. Y6080139). We are also grateful to anonymous reviewers for their good comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hua-xi, G., Kun-long, Y. Study on spatial prediction and time forecast of landslide. Nat Hazards 70, 1735–1748 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9756-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9756-1