Log in

Watershed urbanization and changing flood behavior across the Los Angeles metropolitan region

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the effects of watershed urbanization on stream flood behavior in the Los Angeles metropolitan region. Stream gauge data, spatially distributed rainfall data, land use/land cover, and census population data were used to quantify change in flood behavior and urbanization in multiple watersheds. Increase in flood discharge started at the very early stage of the urbanization when the population density was relatively low but the rate of increase of flood discharge varied across watersheds depending on the distribution of the imperviousness surface and flood mitigation practices. This spatial variability in rainfall–runoff indices and the increasing flood risk across the metropolitan region has posed a challenge to the conventional flood emergency management, which usually responds to flood damages rather than being concerned with the broader issues of land use, land cover, and planning. This study pointed out that alternative land use planning and flood management practices could be mitigating the urban flood implemented hazard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alhambra Creek Watershed Planning Group (2001) Alhambra Creek Watershed Management Plan. http://www.ccrcd.org/alhambra_plan/contents.html

  • Anderson DG (1968) Effects of urban development on floods in northern Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2001-C, Virginia, 22 pp

  • Arnold JG, Allen PM (1999) Validation of automated methods for estimating baseflow and groundwater recharge from stream flow records. J Am Water Resour Assoc 3:411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold CL, Gibbons CJ (1996) Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. J Am Plan Assoc 62:243–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey JF, Thomas WO, Wetzel KL, Ross TJ (1989) Estimation of flood-frequency characteristics and the effects of urbanization for streams in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4194, 71 pp

  • Beighley RE, Moglen GE (2002) Trend assessment in rainfall-runoff behavior in urbanizing watersheds. J Hydrol Eng 7:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri B, Bright E, Coleman P, Dobson J (2002) LandScan: Locating people is what matters. GeoInformatics 5:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth DB (1988) Runoff and stream-channel changes following urbanization in King County, Washington: Engineering Geology in Washington, volume II, Washington. Div Geol Earth Resour Bull 78:638–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth DB (1990) Stream-channel incision following drainage-basin urbanization. Water Resour Bull 26:407–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright EA (2002) LandScan Global Population 1998 Database. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://www.ornl.gov/sci/gist/projects/LandScan/landscan_doc.htm#Summary

  • CH2M Hill (2005) Coyote Creek Watershed Management Plan. http://www.ocwatersheds.com/watersheds/pdfs/Coyote_Existing_Cond_TM1_051206_DRAFT.pdf

  • Clement WV (1984) Effects of urbanization on the hydrologic regime of Johnson Creek. Portland State University master’s thesis, Portland, Oregon, 119 pp

  • Couch C, Hamilton P (2002) USGS fact sheet: effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems. http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ecology/pubs/ulug_fs.pdf

  • CRWR (2002) Arc Hydro GIS for water resources. http://www.crwr.utexas.edu/gis/archydrobook/ArcHydroTools/Tools.htm

  • Dougherty M, Dymond RL, Grizzard TJ Jr, Godrej AN, Zipper CE, Randolph J (2006) Quantifying long-term hydrologic response in an urbanizing basin. J Hydrol Eng 12:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne T, Leopold LB (1978) Water in environmental planning. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Espey WH Jr, Morgan CW, Masch FD (1965) A study of some effects of urbanization on storm runoff from a small watershed. Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin, Technical Report 44D 07-6501 CRWR-2

  • Ethington PJ, Kooistra AM, De Young E (2000) Los Angeles County Union Census Tract Data Series, 1940–1990 Version 1.01. Created with the support of the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundations. University of Southern California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL (1992) Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham PH, Costello LS, Mallon HL (1974) Estimation of imperviousness and specific curb length for forecasting stormwater quality and quantity. J Water Pollut Control Fed 46:717–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks RWB, Woods SD (2000) Pollutant load, population growth and land use. Prog: Water Environ Res Found 11:10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RM, Walker JF, Day JC, Kallio R (1990) The influence of man on hydrologic systems. In: Wolman WG, Riggs HC (eds) Surface water hydrology: the geology of America, vol 0–1. Geological Society of America, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis GE (1975) The effect of urbanization on floods of different recurrence interval. Water Resour Res 11:431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF (1993) On thin plate splines and kriging. In: Tarter ME, Lock MD (eds) Computing and science in statistics 25. Interface Foundation of North America, University of California, Berkeley, pp 55–62

  • Hutchinson MF (1995) Interpolating mean rainfall using thin plate smoothing splines. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF (2004) ANUSPLIN version 4.3. http://cres.anu.edu.au/outputs/anusplin.php

  • Hutchinson MF, Gessler PE (1994) Splines—more than just a smooth interpolator. Geoderma 62:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RD (1979) Urbanization and stream quality impairment. Water Resour Bull 15:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CP (2003) Effects of urban development on floods. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-076-03. http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs07603/

  • Konrad CP, Booth DB (2005) Hydrologic changes in urban streams and their ecological significance. Am Fish Soc Symp 47:157–177

    Google Scholar 

  • LADPW (2006) 2006 Hydrology manual. http://ladpw.org/wrd/Publication/index.cfm

  • Laenen A (1983) Storm runoff as related to urbanization based on data collected in Salem and Portland and generalized for the Willamette Valley, Oregon. USGS Water Resources Investigations Open File Rep. No. 83-4143, USGS

  • Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council (2005) Compton Creek Watershed Management. http://www.lasgrwc.org/ComptonCreekWMP/Documents/Watershed%20Management%20Plan.htm

  • Lyne VD, Hollick M (1979) Stochastic time-variable rainfall–runoff modeling. Hydrology and water resource symposium. Institution of Engineers Australia, Perth, pp 89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH (2003) Modeling hydrologic change. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan RJ, McMahon TA (1990) Evaluation of automated techniques for baseflow and recession analysis. Water Resour Res 26:1465–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsi J (2004) Hazardous metropolis: flooding and urban ecology in Los Angeles. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipper WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph J (2004) Environmental land use planning and management. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaburn GE (1969) Effects of urban development on direct runoff to East Meadow Brook, Nassau County, NewYork. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 627-B, 14 pp

  • Smith JA, Baeck ML, Morrison JE, Sturdevant-Rees P, Turner-Gillespie DF, Bates PD (2002) The regional hydrology of extreme floods in an urbanizing drainage basin. J Hydrometeorol 3:267–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Baeck ML, Meierdiercks KL, Nelson PA, Miller AJ, Holland EJ (2005) Field studies of the storm event hydrologic response in an urbanizing watershed. Water Resour Res 41:W10413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankowski SJ (1972) Population density as an indirect indicator of urban and suburban land-surface modifications. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper: Report 800B, B219-B224

  • State of California Resources Agency (2001) San Gabriel and Los Angeles rivers watershed and open space plan. http://www.rmc.ca.gov/projects/commonground.html

  • Wahba G (1990) Spline models for observational data. CBMS-NSF Regional conference series in applied mathematics 59. SIAM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • White MD, Greer KA (2006) The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Peñasquitos Creek, California. Landsc Urban Plan 74:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Smith JA (2003) Space-time variability of rainfall and extreme flood response in the Menomonee River basin, Wisconsin. J Hydrometeorol 4:506–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **gfen Sheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheng, J., Wilson, J.P. Watershed urbanization and changing flood behavior across the Los Angeles metropolitan region. Nat Hazards 48, 41–57 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9241-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9241-7

Keywords

Navigation