Log in

Ex situ genetic conservation potential of seeds of two high elevation white pines

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic variation in a plant species is a key to its ability to survive and evolve in the face of changing environmental pressures. Due to insect and disease impacts, changes in fire regimes, and a changing climate, many populations of high elevation white pine species continue to experience high mortality levels and potentially worrisome decreases in genetic variation. In recent years, some trees rated highly for resistance to the non-native white pine blister rust have been killed by fire or mountain pine beetle. Ex situ genetic conservation offers the possibility to conserve the genetic variation within a species before much of it is lost. For many conifer species, freezer storage of seed offers a relatively inexpensive, long-term method of storing germplasm for future use. However, there is uncertainty concerning how long seed of some conifers can be stored and retain viability. We report here on results of germination testing of the oldest known seedlots of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.) and foxtail pine (P. balfouriana Grev. & Balf.), some of which had been in storage for several decades. The 52 whitebark pine seedlots averaged 47.7% germination (average seed age of 19.2 years), while the four foxtail pine seedlots had an average germination of 71.3% (average seed age of 15.3 years). Some seedlots of both species had greater than 90% germination. Refinements to the stratification procedure have since been developed which should enhance germination further. A follow-up study examining seedling vigor of long-stored whitebark pine seed is planned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (2009) Gene conservation plan for native trees of Alberta. Working group on native tree gene conservation in Alberta, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation. http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/formain15907/$FILE/GeneConservationPlanForNativeTreesOfAlberta-May2009.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2017

  • Berdeen JC, Riley LE, Sniezko RA (2007) Whitebark pine seed storage and germination: a follow-up look at seedlots from Oregon and Washington. In: Goheen EM, Sniezko RA (tech. coords.) Proceedings of the conference whitebark pine: a Pacific Coast perspective. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, pp 113–121

  • Bonner FT (2008) Chapter 4. Storage of seeds. In: Bonner FT, Karrfalt RP (eds) The woody plant seed manual. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., pp 85–95

  • Bonner FT, Karrfalt RP (2008) The woody plant seed manual. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower AD, Kolotelo D, Aitken SN (2011) Effects of length of storage, and stratification on germination of whitebark pine seeds. West J Appl For 26(1):24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst LM, Jones TA, Smith FS, North T, Guja L (2016) Maximizing seed resources for restoration in an uncertain future. Bioscience 66(1):73–79. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr KE, Eramian A, Eggleston K (2001) Growing whitebark pine seedlings for restoration. In: Tomback DF, Arno SF, Keane RE (eds) Whitebark pine communities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 325–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumroese RK, Williams MI, Stanturf JA, St. Clair JB JB (2015) Considerations for restoring temperate forests of tomorrow: forest restoration, assisted migration, and bioengineering. New For 46:947–964. doi:10.1007/s11056-015-9504-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farjon A (2013) Pinus balfouriana. The IUCN red list of threatened species. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T42345A2974187.en. Accessed 25 Nov 2016

  • Fowler C (2016) Seeds on ice. Am Sci 104(5):304–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernandt DS, López GG, García SO, Liston A (2005) Phylogeny and classification of Pinus. Taxon 54:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada (2012) Order amending Schedule 1 to the species at risk act. Canada Gazette Part II. http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/virtual_sara/files/orders/g2-14614i_e.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2016

  • GRIN-Global (2016) Version 1.9.8.2. http://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/search.aspx. Accessed 11 Dec 2016

  • Hamrick JL (2004) Response of forest trees to global environmental changes. For Ecol Manag 197:323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs DF, Oliet JA, Aronson J, Bolte A, Bullock JM, Donoso PJ, Landhäusser SM, Madsen P, Peng S, Rey-Benayas JM, Weber JC (2015) Restoring forests: what constitutes success in the twenty-first century? New For 46:601–614. doi:10.1007/s11056-015-9513-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolotelo D, Van Steenis E, Peterson M, Bennett R, Trotter D, Dennis J (2001) Seed handling guidebook. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Tree Seed Centre, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman SL, Jenkinson JL (1974) Pinus. In: Schopmeyer CS (tech. coord.) Seeds of woody plants in the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., pp 598–638

  • Krugman SL, Jenkinson JL (2008) Pinus. In: Bonner FT, Karrfalt RP (eds) The woody plant seed manual. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C., pp 809–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledig FT (1986) Conservation strategies for forest gene resources. For Ecol Manag 14:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledig FT (1988) The conservation of diversity in forest trees: why and how should genes be conserved? Bioscience 38:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledig FT, Kitzmiller JH (1992) Genetic strategies for reforestation in the face of global climate change. For Ecol Manag 50:153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaughey WW, Schmidt WC (1990) Autoecology of whitebark pine. Symposium on whitebark pine ecosystems: ecology and management of a high-mountain resource. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, pp 85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirov NT (1946) Viability of pine seed after prolonged cold storage. J Forest 44(3):193–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley LE, Coumas CM, Danielson JF, Berdeen JC (2007) Seedling nursery culture of whitebark pine at Dorena Genetic Resource Center: headaches, successes, and growing pains. In: Goheen EM, Sniezko RA (tech. coords.) Proceedings of the conference whitebark pine: a Pacific Coast perspective. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, pp 121–131

  • Riley LE, Watson RE, Winn LA (2016) Whitebark pine germination: is it really that difficult? Tree Plant Notes 59(2):91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaberg PG, DeHayes DH, Hawley GJ, Nijensohn SE (2008) Anthropogenic alterations of genetic diversity within tree populations: implications for forest ecosystem resilience. For Ecol Manag 256:855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert GH (1954) Viability of various coniferous seeds after cold storage. J Forest 52:446–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezko RA, Kegley AJ, Danchok RS, Long S (2007) Variation in resistance to white pine blister rust among 43 whitebark pine families from Oregon and Washington—early results and implications for conservation. In: Goheen EM, Sniezko RA (tech. coords.) Proceedings of the conference whitebark pine: a Pacific Coast perspective. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, Oregon, pp 82–97

  • Sniezko RA, Mahalovich MF, Schoettle AW, Vogler DR (2011a) Past and current investigations of the genetic resistance to Cronartium ribicola in high-elevation five-needle pines. In: Keane RE, Tomback DF, Murray MP, Smith CM (eds) The future of high-elevation, five-needle white pines in western North America: proceedings of the high five symposium. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, pp 246–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezko RA, Schoettle A, Dunlap J, Vogler D, Conklin D, Bower A, Jensen C, Mangold R, Daoust D, Man G (2011b) Ex situ gene conservation in high elevation white pine species in the United States—a beginning. In: Keane RE, Tomback DF, Murray MP, Smith CM (eds) The future of high-elevation, five-needle white pines in western North America: proceedings of the high five symposium. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, pp 147–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezko RA, Smith J, Liu J-J, Hamelin RC (2014) Genetic resistance to fusiform rust in southern pines and white pine blister rust in white pines—a contrasting tale of two rust pathosystems—current status and future prospects. Forests 5(9):2050–2083. doi:10.3390/f5092050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniezko RA, Danchok R, Savin DP, Liu J-J, Kegley A (2016) Genetic resistance to white pine blister rust in limber pine (Pinus flexilis): major gene resistance in a northern population. Can J For Res 46(9):1173–1178. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2016-0128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf JA (2015) Future landscapes: opportunities and challenges. New For 46:615–644. doi:10.1007/s11056-015-9500-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomback DF, Achuff P (2010) Blister rust and western forest biodiversity: ecology, values and outlook for white pines. For Pathol 40:186–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2011) Whitebark pine species profile. Environmental conservation online system. http://ecos.fws.gov/speciesProfile/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=R00E. Accessed 31 May 2014

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the USDA Forest Service Region 1, Region 5, Region 6, Rocky Mountain Research Station, and Institute of Forest Genetics (Pacific Southwest Research Station), as well as the USDI Bureau of Land Management, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, and Alberta Sustainable Resource Development for supplying seed and information about the seedlots. Marie McLaughlin, Joan Dunlap, Steve Feigner, Nita Rauch, Anna Schoettle, Annie Mix, Dana Perkins, Dave Kolotelo, and Donna Palamarek were key contacts for seed. We also thank Dorena Genetic Resource Center staff, including Rae Watson and Lee Riley, for assistance with the study and Evan Heck for assessment of the whitebark pine x-rays. The USDA Forest Service FHP-WO provided funding to undertake the study, and Gary Man was involved in early discussions on genetic conservation and the need to gather data on the longevity of seed storage in these species. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers and an associate editor for their constructive suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Sniezko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sniezko, R.A., Kegley, A. & Savin, D.P. Ex situ genetic conservation potential of seeds of two high elevation white pines. New Forests 48, 245–261 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-017-9579-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-017-9579-3

Keywords

Navigation